LLM-Assisted Knowledge Graph Completion for Curriculum and Domain Modelling in Personalized Higher Education Recommendations

Hasan Abu-Rasheed, Constance Jumbo, Rashed Al Amin, Christian Weber, Veit Wiese, Roman Obermaisser, Madjid Fathi·January 21, 2025

Summary

An LLM-assisted approach for higher education curriculum modeling creates personalized learning-path recommendations. Large language models complete knowledge graphs, linking university subjects to domain models. This collaborative process involves human experts extracting high-quality topics from lecture materials. The method focuses on developing domain, curriculum, and user models for university modules, evaluated through expert feedback and graph quality metrics. Results show the method enhances the ability to connect related courses across disciplines, personalizing the learning experience.

Key findings

4
  • header
  • header
  • header
  • header

Paper digest

What problem does the paper attempt to solve? Is this a new problem?

The paper addresses the challenge of personalizing learning paths in higher education, particularly for students with diverse backgrounds and varying levels of knowledge. It highlights the inefficiencies in current educational settings where teachers lack the time and resources to analyze individual student needs and course content effectively .

This problem is not entirely new; however, the paper proposes a novel approach by integrating large language models (LLMs) with knowledge graphs (KGs) to enhance the creation and management of personalized learning recommendations. The authors aim to develop a comprehensive and interoperable representation of curriculums that can adapt to different educational contexts, thereby improving the personalization of learning experiences .

By utilizing LLMs to assist in the extraction and analysis of educational content, the paper seeks to streamline the process of constructing KGs, which can then be used to tailor learning paths to individual student goals and backgrounds . This innovative approach represents a significant advancement in the field of educational technology, aiming to bridge the gap between diverse student needs and the existing curriculum structures.


What scientific hypothesis does this paper seek to validate?

The paper seeks to validate the hypothesis that large language models (LLMs) can effectively support the creation and enhancement of knowledge graphs (KGs) in higher education. This involves investigating how LLMs can assist teachers in extracting and analyzing educational content, thereby improving the organization and representation of knowledge within KGs. The research aims to establish a collaborative framework where human evaluators validate the automated processes of topic extraction and classification, ensuring high-quality educational recommendations .


What new ideas, methods, or models does the paper propose? What are the characteristics and advantages compared to previous methods?

The paper presents several innovative ideas, methods, and models aimed at enhancing personalized learning in higher education through the integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) and Knowledge Graphs (KGs). Below is a detailed analysis of these contributions:

1. Human-AI Collaboration for Knowledge Graph Creation

The paper proposes a human-AI collaboration approach where LLMs assist teachers in creating and refining KGs. This method allows for the automatic extraction and analysis of educational materials, which are then evaluated by human experts to ensure quality. This collaboration aims to streamline the process of KG creation, making it more efficient and effective in representing educational content .

2. Comprehensive Ontological Framework

A significant contribution is the development of a comprehensive ontology that integrates curriculum, domain, and user models. This ontology is designed to enhance the interoperability of different study programs, facilitating the creation of a cohesive pool of learning materials. The ontology includes:

  • Curriculum Model: Represents educational content as defined by universities.
  • Domain Model: Models higher abstraction levels of knowledge domains, including sub-domains.
  • User Model: Represents stakeholders, focusing on students and their learning personalization factors .

3. Automated Content Extraction and Classification

The paper introduces an automated pipeline for extracting and classifying content from various educational materials, including lecture slides and videos. This pipeline utilizes advanced models like OpenAI’s Whisper for transcription and GPT-4o for topic extraction. The automation significantly reduces the time and effort required from teachers, allowing them to focus on teaching rather than content organization .

4. Enhanced KG Creation Using LLMs

The integration of LLMs into the KG creation process is highlighted as a robust method for modeling course content. LLMs enhance entity recognition and relationship extraction, which are crucial for constructing high-quality KGs. The paper discusses how LLMs can generate nodes with high semantic similarity to course materials, thus improving the relevance and educational value of the KGs created .

5. Personalized Learning Recommendations

The proposed KG serves as a foundation for a recommender system that can suggest personalized learning paths based on the interconnected nature of information represented in the KG. This personalization considers students' backgrounds, learning goals, and preferences, thereby enhancing the learning experience .

6. Evaluation and Feedback Mechanism

The paper emphasizes the importance of expert evaluation in the development of the ontology and the automated pipeline. Feedback from lecturers is collected to assess the accuracy of topic extraction and the overall effectiveness of the proposed methods. This iterative evaluation process ensures that the developed models meet the practical needs of educators .

Conclusion

In summary, the paper proposes a multifaceted approach to enhancing personalized learning in higher education through the integration of LLMs and KGs. By focusing on human-AI collaboration, developing a comprehensive ontology, automating content extraction, and providing personalized recommendations, the research aims to create a more efficient and effective educational ecosystem. These contributions are expected to significantly improve the organization and delivery of educational content, ultimately benefiting both educators and students . The paper outlines several characteristics and advantages of the proposed LLM-assisted knowledge graph (KG) completion method for curriculum and domain modeling in personalized higher education recommendations, particularly in comparison to previous methods. Below is a detailed analysis:

1. Human-AI Collaboration

One of the key characteristics of the proposed method is the emphasis on human-AI collaboration. Unlike traditional methods that rely heavily on human experts for KG creation, this approach integrates LLMs to assist educators in extracting and analyzing educational materials. This collaboration not only enhances efficiency but also ensures that the final output is validated by human experts, maintaining high-quality standards .

2. Automated Content Extraction and Classification

The proposed method utilizes an automated pipeline for content extraction and classification, which significantly reduces the time and effort required from educators. This automation is achieved through advanced models like OpenAI’s Whisper for transcription and LLMs for topic extraction. Previous methods often lacked such automation, leading to a more labor-intensive process for educators .

3. Comprehensive Ontological Framework

The development of a comprehensive ontology that integrates curriculum, domain, and user models is another significant advantage. This ontology facilitates the interoperability of different study programs, allowing for a more cohesive representation of educational content. Previous methods often struggled with standardizing course representations across different institutions, which limited their effectiveness in personalized learning .

4. Enhanced KG Creation Using LLMs

The integration of LLMs into the KG creation process enhances entity recognition and relationship extraction, making the construction of high-quality KGs more efficient. The paper highlights that KGs created with LLM assistance were rated higher in relevance and educational value by human evaluators compared to those constructed through traditional methods . This synergy between KGs and LLMs is particularly beneficial in the dynamic field of education, where content is constantly evolving .

5. Personalized Learning Recommendations

The proposed KG serves as a foundation for a recommender system that can suggest personalized learning paths based on the interconnected nature of information represented in the KG. This personalization considers students' backgrounds, learning goals, and preferences, which is a significant advancement over previous methods that often provided generic recommendations without considering individual student needs .

6. Evaluation and Feedback Mechanism

The paper emphasizes a robust evaluation and feedback mechanism involving expert validation of the automated extraction and classification processes. This human-in-the-loop approach ensures that the predictions made by the LLM are accurate and relevant, addressing the risks associated with automated systems in sensitive fields like education. Previous methods often lacked such rigorous validation, leading to potential inaccuracies in the educational content .

7. High Precision and Recall Rates

The results presented in the paper indicate high precision, recall, and F1 measure values for the topics and sub-topics extracted from educational materials. This quantitative evaluation demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed pipeline in accurately detecting and classifying educational content, which is a notable improvement over earlier methods that may not have achieved such high levels of accuracy .

Conclusion

In summary, the proposed LLM-assisted KG completion method offers significant advancements over previous methods through its focus on human-AI collaboration, automated content extraction, a comprehensive ontological framework, enhanced KG creation, personalized learning recommendations, and a robust evaluation mechanism. These characteristics collectively contribute to a more efficient, effective, and personalized educational experience for students in higher education .


Do any related researches exist? Who are the noteworthy researchers on this topic in this field?What is the key to the solution mentioned in the paper?

Related Researches and Noteworthy Researchers

Yes, there are several related researches in the field of knowledge graphs (KGs) and their application in personalized higher education recommendations. Noteworthy researchers include:

  • K. Stancin, P. Poscic, D. Jaksic who discussed the state of the art of ontologies in education .
  • E. Katis, H. Kondylakis, G. Agathangelos, K. Vassilakis who developed an ontology for curriculum and syllabus .
  • H. Abu-Rasheed, M. Dornhöfer, C. Weber, G. Kismihók who focused on building contextual KGs for personalized learning recommendations .

Key to the Solution

The key to the solution mentioned in the paper is the human-AI collaboration approach that utilizes large language models (LLMs) to assist in the creation and enhancement of educational KGs. This approach allows for the efficient extraction and analysis of educational content, enabling better structuring of learning materials and personalized learning experiences for students . The integration of LLMs into KG creation enhances entity recognition and relationship extraction, streamlining the process of constructing high-quality KGs in dynamic educational environments .


How were the experiments in the paper designed?

The experiments in the paper were designed to evaluate the effectiveness of a human-AI collaboration approach in constructing a knowledge graph (KG) for higher education curriculums. Here are the key components of the experimental design:

1. Course Selection and Structure: The experiments were conducted using two university modules, specifically in Embedded Systems and Development of Embedded Systems Using FPGA, taught at the University of Siegen, Germany. Each course consisted of 9 sessions, covering diverse topics over one academic semester .

2. Expert Evaluation: The evaluation involved module lecturers, including one professor and two PhD assistants, who provided qualitative feedback on the ontology and the overall approach. This feedback was gathered through group meetings where the ontology was presented and discussed in relation to the lecturers' teaching experiences and learning goals .

3. Quantitative Feedback: Lecturers assessed the accuracy of topic extraction and classification through a comprehensive list of extracted topics and sub-topics. They evaluated the correctness of extraction, which allowed for quantitative input regarding the performance of the extraction and classification models .

4. Human-in-the-Loop Approach: A human-in-the-loop methodology was employed, where teachers validated the predictions made by the intelligent algorithms. This ensured high-quality content curation for the KG, as teachers made the final decisions on extracted concepts and their classifications .

5. Evaluation Metrics: The experiments included precision, recall, and F1 measure values for the topics and sub-topics extracted from the lecture materials. A total of 1197 extraction samples were evaluated, which provided insights into the effectiveness of the proposed pipeline .

Overall, the experimental design emphasized collaboration between human experts and AI systems to enhance the quality and personalization of educational content through the construction of a knowledge graph.


What is the dataset used for quantitative evaluation? Is the code open source?

The dataset used for quantitative evaluation consists of a total of 1197 extraction samples, which include 173 topics, 512 sub-topics, and 512 descriptions evaluated by experts . The evaluation metrics reported include precision, recall, and F1 measure values for both topics and sub-topics, demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed pipeline in detecting and classifying educational content .

Regarding the code, the provided context does not specify whether it is open source or not. More information would be needed to address this aspect.


Do the experiments and results in the paper provide good support for the scientific hypotheses that need to be verified? Please analyze.

The experiments and results presented in the paper provide substantial support for the scientific hypotheses regarding the integration of large language models (LLMs) and knowledge graphs (KGs) in higher education.

Human-AI Collaboration
The research emphasizes a human-AI collaborative approach, where teachers validate the predictions made by the LLMs. This method not only enhances the accuracy of topic extraction and classification but also ensures that the educational content is contextually relevant and aligned with the curriculum . The feedback from educators indicates that this collaboration significantly aids in structuring course content and personalizing learning experiences for students with varying backgrounds and goals .

Evaluation of the Ontology and Pipeline
The evaluation conducted with module lecturers demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed ontology and pipeline. The qualitative feedback from experts, including professors and PhD assistants, highlights the high-quality extraction and classification of topics, which is crucial for creating a comprehensive KG . The quantitative assessments further validate the accuracy of the extraction process, reinforcing the reliability of the results .

Impact on Learning Path Recommendations
The study also illustrates how the integration of LLMs and KGs can enhance the personalization of learning paths. By providing a structured representation of educational content, the proposed system allows for more efficient recommendations tailored to individual student needs . The results indicate that the automated extraction and classification processes save educators time and improve the overall quality of learning materials, which supports the hypothesis that LLMs can effectively assist in educational contexts .

In conclusion, the experiments and results in the paper substantiate the scientific hypotheses regarding the potential of LLMs and KGs to improve educational outcomes through enhanced content organization and personalized learning recommendations. The collaborative approach between human experts and AI systems is shown to be effective in achieving these goals .


What are the contributions of this paper?

The paper titled "LLM-Assisted Knowledge Graph Completion for Curriculum and Domain Modelling in Personalized Higher Education Recommendations" presents several key contributions to the field of education and knowledge graph (KG) development:

1. Human-AI Collaboration Approach
The research proposes a human-AI collaboration model that supports teachers in creating and refining knowledge graphs for higher education. This approach utilizes large language models (LLMs) to assist in the extraction and analysis of educational materials, ensuring high-quality content through human validation .

2. Development of a Comprehensive Ontology
The authors developed an ontological foundation specifically designed for higher education, which integrates curriculum, domain, and user models. This ontology facilitates the interoperability of different study programs and enhances the potential for efficient learning-path recommendations .

3. Enhanced Knowledge Graph Creation
The paper highlights the effectiveness of using LLMs to enhance the creation and completion of educational knowledge graphs. By automating the extraction and classification of topics and sub-topics, the process becomes more efficient, allowing for a more cohesive organization of vast educational information .

4. Personalization of Learning Experiences
The proposed pipeline not only aids in structuring course content but also personalizes the learning experience for students. It considers individual knowledge levels, scientific backgrounds, and career goals, thereby tailoring educational recommendations to meet diverse student needs .

5. Evaluation and Feedback Mechanism
The research includes a robust evaluation mechanism involving expert feedback from lecturers, ensuring that the automated processes align with educational goals and standards. This feedback loop enhances the accuracy of topic extraction and classification, contributing to the overall quality of the knowledge graph .

These contributions collectively aim to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of curriculum modeling and personalized education in higher learning institutions.


What work can be continued in depth?

To continue work in depth, several areas can be explored further:

1. Personalization Algorithms
Research can focus on developing more sophisticated algorithms for personalizing learning paths based on individual student profiles, including their prior knowledge, career goals, and learning preferences. This would enhance the effectiveness of the recommendations generated by the knowledge graph (KG) .

2. Interoperability of Learning Materials
Further investigation into creating a comprehensive and homogenous pool of learning materials across different institutions and programs can be pursued. This would involve enhancing the ontological foundation to ensure comparability and integration of diverse educational content .

3. Human-AI Collaboration
Expanding the framework for human-AI collaboration in educational settings can be beneficial. This includes refining the processes for teachers to validate and enhance the automatic extraction of topics and relationships within the KG, ensuring high-quality educational content representation .

4. Evaluation Metrics
Developing robust evaluation metrics for assessing the quality and effectiveness of the KGs and the personalized learning recommendations can provide insights into their impact on student learning outcomes .

5. Domain-Specific Models
Creating domain-specific models that cater to various fields of study can enhance the relevance of the learning paths recommended to students, ensuring that the educational content aligns closely with industry requirements and academic standards .

By focusing on these areas, the research can contribute significantly to the advancement of personalized education through the effective use of knowledge graphs and large language models.


Introduction
Background
Overview of current challenges in higher education curriculum design
Importance of personalized learning paths in enhancing educational outcomes
Objective
To present an innovative approach using Large Language Models (LLMs) for curriculum modeling in higher education
To detail the collaborative process involving human experts and LLMs in completing knowledge graphs
Method
Data Collection
Gathering university lecture materials and subject data
Data Preprocessing
Extracting high-quality topics from the collected data
Model Development
Creating domain, curriculum, and user models for university modules
Utilizing LLMs to complete knowledge graphs by linking subjects to domain models
Expert Feedback Integration
Incorporating expert insights to refine and validate the models
Evaluation
Assessing the method's effectiveness through expert feedback and graph quality metrics
Results
Enhanced Course Connections
Demonstrating the method's ability to connect related courses across disciplines
Personalized Learning Experience
Illustrating how the approach personalizes the learning experience for students
Conclusion
Summary of Findings
Recap of the method's contributions to higher education curriculum modeling
Implications for Practice
Recommendations for educators and curriculum developers on implementing the LLM-assisted approach
Future Directions
Discussion on potential advancements and further research in LLM applications for education
Basic info
papers
human-computer interaction
artificial intelligence
Advanced features
Insights
How are the results of the method evaluated, and what do they demonstrate in terms of enhancing the learning experience?
What is the collaborative process involved in developing domain, curriculum, and user models for university modules?
How does the method utilize large language models to complete knowledge graphs?
What is the main idea of the LLM-assisted approach for higher education curriculum modeling?

LLM-Assisted Knowledge Graph Completion for Curriculum and Domain Modelling in Personalized Higher Education Recommendations

Hasan Abu-Rasheed, Constance Jumbo, Rashed Al Amin, Christian Weber, Veit Wiese, Roman Obermaisser, Madjid Fathi·January 21, 2025

Summary

An LLM-assisted approach for higher education curriculum modeling creates personalized learning-path recommendations. Large language models complete knowledge graphs, linking university subjects to domain models. This collaborative process involves human experts extracting high-quality topics from lecture materials. The method focuses on developing domain, curriculum, and user models for university modules, evaluated through expert feedback and graph quality metrics. Results show the method enhances the ability to connect related courses across disciplines, personalizing the learning experience.
Mind map
Overview of current challenges in higher education curriculum design
Importance of personalized learning paths in enhancing educational outcomes
Background
To present an innovative approach using Large Language Models (LLMs) for curriculum modeling in higher education
To detail the collaborative process involving human experts and LLMs in completing knowledge graphs
Objective
Introduction
Gathering university lecture materials and subject data
Data Collection
Extracting high-quality topics from the collected data
Data Preprocessing
Creating domain, curriculum, and user models for university modules
Utilizing LLMs to complete knowledge graphs by linking subjects to domain models
Model Development
Incorporating expert insights to refine and validate the models
Expert Feedback Integration
Assessing the method's effectiveness through expert feedback and graph quality metrics
Evaluation
Method
Demonstrating the method's ability to connect related courses across disciplines
Enhanced Course Connections
Illustrating how the approach personalizes the learning experience for students
Personalized Learning Experience
Results
Recap of the method's contributions to higher education curriculum modeling
Summary of Findings
Recommendations for educators and curriculum developers on implementing the LLM-assisted approach
Implications for Practice
Discussion on potential advancements and further research in LLM applications for education
Future Directions
Conclusion
Outline
Introduction
Background
Overview of current challenges in higher education curriculum design
Importance of personalized learning paths in enhancing educational outcomes
Objective
To present an innovative approach using Large Language Models (LLMs) for curriculum modeling in higher education
To detail the collaborative process involving human experts and LLMs in completing knowledge graphs
Method
Data Collection
Gathering university lecture materials and subject data
Data Preprocessing
Extracting high-quality topics from the collected data
Model Development
Creating domain, curriculum, and user models for university modules
Utilizing LLMs to complete knowledge graphs by linking subjects to domain models
Expert Feedback Integration
Incorporating expert insights to refine and validate the models
Evaluation
Assessing the method's effectiveness through expert feedback and graph quality metrics
Results
Enhanced Course Connections
Demonstrating the method's ability to connect related courses across disciplines
Personalized Learning Experience
Illustrating how the approach personalizes the learning experience for students
Conclusion
Summary of Findings
Recap of the method's contributions to higher education curriculum modeling
Implications for Practice
Recommendations for educators and curriculum developers on implementing the LLM-assisted approach
Future Directions
Discussion on potential advancements and further research in LLM applications for education
Key findings
4

Paper digest

What problem does the paper attempt to solve? Is this a new problem?

The paper addresses the challenge of personalizing learning paths in higher education, particularly for students with diverse backgrounds and varying levels of knowledge. It highlights the inefficiencies in current educational settings where teachers lack the time and resources to analyze individual student needs and course content effectively .

This problem is not entirely new; however, the paper proposes a novel approach by integrating large language models (LLMs) with knowledge graphs (KGs) to enhance the creation and management of personalized learning recommendations. The authors aim to develop a comprehensive and interoperable representation of curriculums that can adapt to different educational contexts, thereby improving the personalization of learning experiences .

By utilizing LLMs to assist in the extraction and analysis of educational content, the paper seeks to streamline the process of constructing KGs, which can then be used to tailor learning paths to individual student goals and backgrounds . This innovative approach represents a significant advancement in the field of educational technology, aiming to bridge the gap between diverse student needs and the existing curriculum structures.


What scientific hypothesis does this paper seek to validate?

The paper seeks to validate the hypothesis that large language models (LLMs) can effectively support the creation and enhancement of knowledge graphs (KGs) in higher education. This involves investigating how LLMs can assist teachers in extracting and analyzing educational content, thereby improving the organization and representation of knowledge within KGs. The research aims to establish a collaborative framework where human evaluators validate the automated processes of topic extraction and classification, ensuring high-quality educational recommendations .


What new ideas, methods, or models does the paper propose? What are the characteristics and advantages compared to previous methods?

The paper presents several innovative ideas, methods, and models aimed at enhancing personalized learning in higher education through the integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) and Knowledge Graphs (KGs). Below is a detailed analysis of these contributions:

1. Human-AI Collaboration for Knowledge Graph Creation

The paper proposes a human-AI collaboration approach where LLMs assist teachers in creating and refining KGs. This method allows for the automatic extraction and analysis of educational materials, which are then evaluated by human experts to ensure quality. This collaboration aims to streamline the process of KG creation, making it more efficient and effective in representing educational content .

2. Comprehensive Ontological Framework

A significant contribution is the development of a comprehensive ontology that integrates curriculum, domain, and user models. This ontology is designed to enhance the interoperability of different study programs, facilitating the creation of a cohesive pool of learning materials. The ontology includes:

  • Curriculum Model: Represents educational content as defined by universities.
  • Domain Model: Models higher abstraction levels of knowledge domains, including sub-domains.
  • User Model: Represents stakeholders, focusing on students and their learning personalization factors .

3. Automated Content Extraction and Classification

The paper introduces an automated pipeline for extracting and classifying content from various educational materials, including lecture slides and videos. This pipeline utilizes advanced models like OpenAI’s Whisper for transcription and GPT-4o for topic extraction. The automation significantly reduces the time and effort required from teachers, allowing them to focus on teaching rather than content organization .

4. Enhanced KG Creation Using LLMs

The integration of LLMs into the KG creation process is highlighted as a robust method for modeling course content. LLMs enhance entity recognition and relationship extraction, which are crucial for constructing high-quality KGs. The paper discusses how LLMs can generate nodes with high semantic similarity to course materials, thus improving the relevance and educational value of the KGs created .

5. Personalized Learning Recommendations

The proposed KG serves as a foundation for a recommender system that can suggest personalized learning paths based on the interconnected nature of information represented in the KG. This personalization considers students' backgrounds, learning goals, and preferences, thereby enhancing the learning experience .

6. Evaluation and Feedback Mechanism

The paper emphasizes the importance of expert evaluation in the development of the ontology and the automated pipeline. Feedback from lecturers is collected to assess the accuracy of topic extraction and the overall effectiveness of the proposed methods. This iterative evaluation process ensures that the developed models meet the practical needs of educators .

Conclusion

In summary, the paper proposes a multifaceted approach to enhancing personalized learning in higher education through the integration of LLMs and KGs. By focusing on human-AI collaboration, developing a comprehensive ontology, automating content extraction, and providing personalized recommendations, the research aims to create a more efficient and effective educational ecosystem. These contributions are expected to significantly improve the organization and delivery of educational content, ultimately benefiting both educators and students . The paper outlines several characteristics and advantages of the proposed LLM-assisted knowledge graph (KG) completion method for curriculum and domain modeling in personalized higher education recommendations, particularly in comparison to previous methods. Below is a detailed analysis:

1. Human-AI Collaboration

One of the key characteristics of the proposed method is the emphasis on human-AI collaboration. Unlike traditional methods that rely heavily on human experts for KG creation, this approach integrates LLMs to assist educators in extracting and analyzing educational materials. This collaboration not only enhances efficiency but also ensures that the final output is validated by human experts, maintaining high-quality standards .

2. Automated Content Extraction and Classification

The proposed method utilizes an automated pipeline for content extraction and classification, which significantly reduces the time and effort required from educators. This automation is achieved through advanced models like OpenAI’s Whisper for transcription and LLMs for topic extraction. Previous methods often lacked such automation, leading to a more labor-intensive process for educators .

3. Comprehensive Ontological Framework

The development of a comprehensive ontology that integrates curriculum, domain, and user models is another significant advantage. This ontology facilitates the interoperability of different study programs, allowing for a more cohesive representation of educational content. Previous methods often struggled with standardizing course representations across different institutions, which limited their effectiveness in personalized learning .

4. Enhanced KG Creation Using LLMs

The integration of LLMs into the KG creation process enhances entity recognition and relationship extraction, making the construction of high-quality KGs more efficient. The paper highlights that KGs created with LLM assistance were rated higher in relevance and educational value by human evaluators compared to those constructed through traditional methods . This synergy between KGs and LLMs is particularly beneficial in the dynamic field of education, where content is constantly evolving .

5. Personalized Learning Recommendations

The proposed KG serves as a foundation for a recommender system that can suggest personalized learning paths based on the interconnected nature of information represented in the KG. This personalization considers students' backgrounds, learning goals, and preferences, which is a significant advancement over previous methods that often provided generic recommendations without considering individual student needs .

6. Evaluation and Feedback Mechanism

The paper emphasizes a robust evaluation and feedback mechanism involving expert validation of the automated extraction and classification processes. This human-in-the-loop approach ensures that the predictions made by the LLM are accurate and relevant, addressing the risks associated with automated systems in sensitive fields like education. Previous methods often lacked such rigorous validation, leading to potential inaccuracies in the educational content .

7. High Precision and Recall Rates

The results presented in the paper indicate high precision, recall, and F1 measure values for the topics and sub-topics extracted from educational materials. This quantitative evaluation demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed pipeline in accurately detecting and classifying educational content, which is a notable improvement over earlier methods that may not have achieved such high levels of accuracy .

Conclusion

In summary, the proposed LLM-assisted KG completion method offers significant advancements over previous methods through its focus on human-AI collaboration, automated content extraction, a comprehensive ontological framework, enhanced KG creation, personalized learning recommendations, and a robust evaluation mechanism. These characteristics collectively contribute to a more efficient, effective, and personalized educational experience for students in higher education .


Do any related researches exist? Who are the noteworthy researchers on this topic in this field?What is the key to the solution mentioned in the paper?

Related Researches and Noteworthy Researchers

Yes, there are several related researches in the field of knowledge graphs (KGs) and their application in personalized higher education recommendations. Noteworthy researchers include:

  • K. Stancin, P. Poscic, D. Jaksic who discussed the state of the art of ontologies in education .
  • E. Katis, H. Kondylakis, G. Agathangelos, K. Vassilakis who developed an ontology for curriculum and syllabus .
  • H. Abu-Rasheed, M. Dornhöfer, C. Weber, G. Kismihók who focused on building contextual KGs for personalized learning recommendations .

Key to the Solution

The key to the solution mentioned in the paper is the human-AI collaboration approach that utilizes large language models (LLMs) to assist in the creation and enhancement of educational KGs. This approach allows for the efficient extraction and analysis of educational content, enabling better structuring of learning materials and personalized learning experiences for students . The integration of LLMs into KG creation enhances entity recognition and relationship extraction, streamlining the process of constructing high-quality KGs in dynamic educational environments .


How were the experiments in the paper designed?

The experiments in the paper were designed to evaluate the effectiveness of a human-AI collaboration approach in constructing a knowledge graph (KG) for higher education curriculums. Here are the key components of the experimental design:

1. Course Selection and Structure: The experiments were conducted using two university modules, specifically in Embedded Systems and Development of Embedded Systems Using FPGA, taught at the University of Siegen, Germany. Each course consisted of 9 sessions, covering diverse topics over one academic semester .

2. Expert Evaluation: The evaluation involved module lecturers, including one professor and two PhD assistants, who provided qualitative feedback on the ontology and the overall approach. This feedback was gathered through group meetings where the ontology was presented and discussed in relation to the lecturers' teaching experiences and learning goals .

3. Quantitative Feedback: Lecturers assessed the accuracy of topic extraction and classification through a comprehensive list of extracted topics and sub-topics. They evaluated the correctness of extraction, which allowed for quantitative input regarding the performance of the extraction and classification models .

4. Human-in-the-Loop Approach: A human-in-the-loop methodology was employed, where teachers validated the predictions made by the intelligent algorithms. This ensured high-quality content curation for the KG, as teachers made the final decisions on extracted concepts and their classifications .

5. Evaluation Metrics: The experiments included precision, recall, and F1 measure values for the topics and sub-topics extracted from the lecture materials. A total of 1197 extraction samples were evaluated, which provided insights into the effectiveness of the proposed pipeline .

Overall, the experimental design emphasized collaboration between human experts and AI systems to enhance the quality and personalization of educational content through the construction of a knowledge graph.


What is the dataset used for quantitative evaluation? Is the code open source?

The dataset used for quantitative evaluation consists of a total of 1197 extraction samples, which include 173 topics, 512 sub-topics, and 512 descriptions evaluated by experts . The evaluation metrics reported include precision, recall, and F1 measure values for both topics and sub-topics, demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed pipeline in detecting and classifying educational content .

Regarding the code, the provided context does not specify whether it is open source or not. More information would be needed to address this aspect.


Do the experiments and results in the paper provide good support for the scientific hypotheses that need to be verified? Please analyze.

The experiments and results presented in the paper provide substantial support for the scientific hypotheses regarding the integration of large language models (LLMs) and knowledge graphs (KGs) in higher education.

Human-AI Collaboration
The research emphasizes a human-AI collaborative approach, where teachers validate the predictions made by the LLMs. This method not only enhances the accuracy of topic extraction and classification but also ensures that the educational content is contextually relevant and aligned with the curriculum . The feedback from educators indicates that this collaboration significantly aids in structuring course content and personalizing learning experiences for students with varying backgrounds and goals .

Evaluation of the Ontology and Pipeline
The evaluation conducted with module lecturers demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed ontology and pipeline. The qualitative feedback from experts, including professors and PhD assistants, highlights the high-quality extraction and classification of topics, which is crucial for creating a comprehensive KG . The quantitative assessments further validate the accuracy of the extraction process, reinforcing the reliability of the results .

Impact on Learning Path Recommendations
The study also illustrates how the integration of LLMs and KGs can enhance the personalization of learning paths. By providing a structured representation of educational content, the proposed system allows for more efficient recommendations tailored to individual student needs . The results indicate that the automated extraction and classification processes save educators time and improve the overall quality of learning materials, which supports the hypothesis that LLMs can effectively assist in educational contexts .

In conclusion, the experiments and results in the paper substantiate the scientific hypotheses regarding the potential of LLMs and KGs to improve educational outcomes through enhanced content organization and personalized learning recommendations. The collaborative approach between human experts and AI systems is shown to be effective in achieving these goals .


What are the contributions of this paper?

The paper titled "LLM-Assisted Knowledge Graph Completion for Curriculum and Domain Modelling in Personalized Higher Education Recommendations" presents several key contributions to the field of education and knowledge graph (KG) development:

1. Human-AI Collaboration Approach
The research proposes a human-AI collaboration model that supports teachers in creating and refining knowledge graphs for higher education. This approach utilizes large language models (LLMs) to assist in the extraction and analysis of educational materials, ensuring high-quality content through human validation .

2. Development of a Comprehensive Ontology
The authors developed an ontological foundation specifically designed for higher education, which integrates curriculum, domain, and user models. This ontology facilitates the interoperability of different study programs and enhances the potential for efficient learning-path recommendations .

3. Enhanced Knowledge Graph Creation
The paper highlights the effectiveness of using LLMs to enhance the creation and completion of educational knowledge graphs. By automating the extraction and classification of topics and sub-topics, the process becomes more efficient, allowing for a more cohesive organization of vast educational information .

4. Personalization of Learning Experiences
The proposed pipeline not only aids in structuring course content but also personalizes the learning experience for students. It considers individual knowledge levels, scientific backgrounds, and career goals, thereby tailoring educational recommendations to meet diverse student needs .

5. Evaluation and Feedback Mechanism
The research includes a robust evaluation mechanism involving expert feedback from lecturers, ensuring that the automated processes align with educational goals and standards. This feedback loop enhances the accuracy of topic extraction and classification, contributing to the overall quality of the knowledge graph .

These contributions collectively aim to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of curriculum modeling and personalized education in higher learning institutions.


What work can be continued in depth?

To continue work in depth, several areas can be explored further:

1. Personalization Algorithms
Research can focus on developing more sophisticated algorithms for personalizing learning paths based on individual student profiles, including their prior knowledge, career goals, and learning preferences. This would enhance the effectiveness of the recommendations generated by the knowledge graph (KG) .

2. Interoperability of Learning Materials
Further investigation into creating a comprehensive and homogenous pool of learning materials across different institutions and programs can be pursued. This would involve enhancing the ontological foundation to ensure comparability and integration of diverse educational content .

3. Human-AI Collaboration
Expanding the framework for human-AI collaboration in educational settings can be beneficial. This includes refining the processes for teachers to validate and enhance the automatic extraction of topics and relationships within the KG, ensuring high-quality educational content representation .

4. Evaluation Metrics
Developing robust evaluation metrics for assessing the quality and effectiveness of the KGs and the personalized learning recommendations can provide insights into their impact on student learning outcomes .

5. Domain-Specific Models
Creating domain-specific models that cater to various fields of study can enhance the relevance of the learning paths recommended to students, ensuring that the educational content aligns closely with industry requirements and academic standards .

By focusing on these areas, the research can contribute significantly to the advancement of personalized education through the effective use of knowledge graphs and large language models.

Scan the QR code to ask more questions about the paper
© 2025 Powerdrill. All rights reserved.