Extending the design space of ontologization practices: Using bCLEARer as an example

Chris Partridge, Andrew Mitchell, Sergio de Cesare, John Beverley·January 30, 2025

Summary

The paper expands on the design space for ontologization, proposing a broader approach than current practices. It emphasizes designing ontologization processes, using bCLEARer as an example, and argues for setting an evolutionary context to understand new practices within digitalization's evolution. Ontologization is framed as a strategic tool for leveraging digitalization's opportunities. The paper advocates for a more comprehensive approach to managing the ontologization process, recognizing its impact on the quality of the resulting ontologies. It highlights the need for advancements in formalization processes and references works across philosophy, logic, software architecture, accounting, and cybernetics to support this.

Key findings

2

Paper digest

What problem does the paper attempt to solve? Is this a new problem?

The paper addresses the issue of design poverty in formal ontologization processes, highlighting the need for a more engineered approach to both the processes and products involved in ontologization. It suggests that current methodologies do not fully exploit the potential of the design space available for ontologization practices, particularly in the context of digitalization .

This problem is not entirely new; however, the paper proposes a radical expansion of the design space by introducing the bCLEARer methodology as an outlier approach that can enhance the ontologization process. It emphasizes the importance of contextual scaffolding and evolutionary perspectives to better understand and leverage the opportunities presented by digitalization . Thus, while the problem of optimizing ontologization practices has been recognized, the specific framing and proposed solutions in this paper offer a fresh perspective on how to address it effectively.


What scientific hypothesis does this paper seek to validate?

The paper seeks to validate the hypothesis that the bCLEARer framework can enhance the process of digitalization by systematically finding and exploiting opportunities for computerized and ontologized digitalization. It emphasizes the importance of co-evolution between technology and cultural practices, suggesting that the evolution of cultural practices is crucial for successfully leveraging technological innovations . Additionally, it discusses the role of evolutionary contingency in innovation, highlighting how both macro- and micro-evolutionary factors influence the outcomes of digitalization efforts .


What new ideas, methods, or models does the paper propose? What are the characteristics and advantages compared to previous methods?

The paper "Extending the design space of ontologization practices: Using bCLEARer as an example" proposes several new ideas, methods, and models aimed at enriching the ontologization process and adapting it to the evolving landscape of digitalization. Below is a detailed analysis of these proposals:

1. Expansion of the Design Space

The authors argue for a broader design space for ontologization practices, suggesting that current methodologies are limited. They advocate for the exploration of radical new practices that can be integrated into the ontologization process, which they believe is essential for leveraging the opportunities presented by digitalization .

2. Introduction of the bCLEARer Methodology

The paper introduces the bCLEARer methodology as an outlier approach to ontologization. This methodology is characterized by its ability to extend and enrich the information transmission process while iterating it, mimicking the evolution of multiple generations within a single transmission. This iterative process is seen as a way to increase the pace of innovation and adapt to uncertainties in the digital landscape .

3. Contextual Scaffolding

The authors emphasize the importance of contextual scaffolding in the ontologization process. They argue that setting the right context can significantly impact the success of ontologization efforts. By situating digitalization within an evolutionary framework, they provide a perspective that helps understand the nature of new practices and their implications for information evolution [citation:1 The paper "Extending the design space of ontologization practices: Using bCLEARer as an example" outlines several characteristics and advantages of the bCLEARer methodology compared to previous ontologization methods. Below is a detailed analysis based on the content of the paper.

Characteristics of bCLEARer Methodology

  1. Iterative Information Transmission
    The bCLEARer methodology emphasizes an iterative approach to information transmission, which allows for the evolution of multiple generations within a single transmission. This mimics natural evolutionary processes, enabling continuous improvement and adaptation of the information being processed .

  2. Inclusion of Full Data Sets
    Unlike traditional methodologies that often exclude data from the ontologization process, bCLEARer includes the full data set from the outset. This all-or-nothing approach ensures that no level of generality is overlooked, allowing for a more comprehensive understanding of the information landscape .

  3. Pipeline Architecture
    The bCLEARer process utilizes a pipeline (pipe-and-filter) architecture, which facilitates a structured flow of data through various processing components. This architecture is flexible and can evolve over time, adapting to the specific needs of the project .

  4. Contextual Scaffolding
    The methodology incorporates contextual scaffolding, which situates digitalization within an evolutionary framework. This perspective helps to better understand the nature of new practices and their implications for information evolution .

Advantages Over Previous Methods

  1. Enhanced Adaptability
    The iterative nature of bCLEARer allows for rapid adaptation to changes and uncertainties in the digital landscape. This contrasts with traditional methods that may be more rigid and less responsive to evolving needs .

  2. Comprehensive Data Utilization
    By including all data levels in the ontologization process, bCLEARer enhances the richness and accuracy of the resulting ontologies. Previous methodologies often scoped out critical data levels, leading to potential gaps in understanding .

  3. Facilitated Innovation
    The design choices in bCLEARer are aimed at increasing the pace of innovation by systematically leading to new opportunities. This structured approach reduces the randomness associated with innovation, making it easier to identify and exploit potential advancements .

  4. Evolutionary Perspective
    The evolutionary context provided by bCLEARer positions ontologization as a strategic tool for leveraging digitalization opportunities. This broader perspective allows practitioners to see ontologization as part of a larger information evolutionary process, enhancing its relevance and applicability .

  5. Flexibility in Design
    The pipeline architecture of bCLEARer allows for a flexible arrangement of components that can evolve based on project needs. This flexibility is a significant advantage over traditional methodologies that may have a more fixed structure .

Conclusion

In summary, the bCLEARer methodology presents a significant advancement in ontologization practices by incorporating iterative processes, comprehensive data inclusion, and a flexible architecture. These characteristics not only enhance adaptability and innovation but also provide a richer context for understanding the implications of digitalization in the ontologization process .


Do any related researches exist? Who are the noteworthy researchers on this topic in this field?What is the key to the solution mentioned in the paper?

Related Researches and Noteworthy Researchers

The paper discusses various methodologies and frameworks related to ontology development and management, indicating that there is a significant body of research in this field. Noteworthy researchers include:

  • C. Partridge, who has contributed extensively to the understanding of ontologies and their applications in various domains .
  • M. Uschold and M. King, known for their work on methodologies for building ontologies .
  • J. Mokyr, who has explored the historical context of innovation, which is relevant to the evolution of ontological practices .

Key to the Solution

The key to the solution mentioned in the paper revolves around the concept of information evolution. The authors suggest that understanding digitalization as a part of the broader evolution of information transmission is critical. They emphasize that computerization and ontologization are essential cultural practices that co-evolve with digitalization, highlighting the importance of context in successfully implementing ontological frameworks .


How were the experiments in the paper designed?

The experiments in the paper were designed using the bCLEARer methodology, which serves as an outlier approach to systematically find and exploit opportunities for computerized and ontologized digitalization. This methodology emphasizes the importance of both macro- and micro-evolutionary contingency, recognizing that the evolution of cultural practices and technology must co-evolve to successfully exploit innovation opportunities .

The design process involves creating a framework that maximizes the chances of identifying and utilizing general and specific opportunities within the digitalization context. This is achieved by partitioning the design space along two dimensions: levels of generality and the journey to digitalization, which includes various evolutionary steps from traditional methods to modern computing technologies .

Furthermore, the bCLEARer pipeline operates in a controlled environment (in vitro) while also being tested in real-world scenarios (in vivo), ensuring that the innovations are relevant and applicable .


What is the dataset used for quantitative evaluation? Is the code open source?

The dataset used for quantitative evaluation in the bCLEARer approach typically includes one or more datasets that may consist of both structured and unstructured data, although structured data is preferred . This dataset undergoes a regimented evolution to achieve a more digitally aligned state .

Regarding the code, there are open-source examples of the bCLEARer approach available on GitHub, which can be accessed at the provided link .


Do the experiments and results in the paper provide good support for the scientific hypotheses that need to be verified? Please analyze.

The paper discusses the concept of evolutionary contingency and its implications for innovation, particularly in the context of the bCLEARer framework. It highlights the uncertainties surrounding innovation and how these uncertainties can be framed as contingency, recognizing that evolution is sensitive to historical paths and chance .

The experiments and results presented in the paper suggest that bCLEARer can effectively extend and enrich the information transmission process, mimicking the evolution of multiple generations within a single transmission . This indicates a systematic approach to finding and exploiting opportunities for digitalization, which aligns with the scientific hypotheses regarding the potential for innovation in a structured environment .

However, the paper also emphasizes the importance of cultural practices co-evolving with technology to fully exploit innovation opportunities . This suggests that while the bCLEARer framework may provide a robust method for identifying opportunities, the actual realization of these opportunities is contingent upon broader socio-cultural factors, which may not be fully addressed in the experimental results.

In conclusion, while the experiments and results provide a solid foundation for the hypotheses regarding the bCLEARer framework's effectiveness in fostering innovation, the broader implications of cultural co-evolution and the role of chance in evolutionary processes indicate that further verification and exploration are necessary to fully support these scientific hypotheses .


What are the contributions of this paper?

The paper titled "Extending the design space of ontologization practices: Using bCLEARer as an example" makes several key contributions:

  1. Contextual Framework: It emphasizes the importance of setting the right context for success in ontologization practices, suggesting that an evolutionary perspective on information transmission is crucial .

  2. Digitalization and Ontologization: The paper situates digitalization as a significant evolutionary step in information transmission, framing ontologization as a cultural practice that coevolves with digitalization .

  3. Methodological Insights: It introduces the bCLEARer methodology as an outlier approach to ontologization, providing a contrast to mainstream methodologies and highlighting the need for innovative practices in the field .

  4. Design Space Exploration: The authors discuss the potential for expanding the design space of ontologization practices, advocating for the exploration of new methodologies that can better exploit emerging opportunities in digitalization .

  5. Interdisciplinary Connections: The paper connects ontologization to broader themes in information evolution, suggesting that understanding these connections can enhance the effectiveness of ontological practices .

These contributions aim to encourage the community to adopt a wider range of practices and to rethink the foundational aspects of ontologization in the context of digital transformation.


What work can be continued in depth?

To continue work in depth, several areas can be explored based on the ontologization practices and methodologies discussed in the context:

1. Engineering of Ontologization Processes
There is a significant opportunity to develop a more engineered ontologization process. Current methodologies are described as design poor, indicating a need for a systematic approach to enhance the quality of these processes .

2. Exploration of bCLEARer Methodology
The bCLEARer methodology serves as an outlier example that has evolved over three decades. Further research can focus on its application across various situations, including legacy system migration and quality control of existing systems .

3. Contextual Scaffolding for Digitalization
Setting the right context for ontologization is crucial. This involves understanding digitalization as part of a broader evolutionary perspective, which can help in identifying new practices and opportunities for exploitation .

4. Addressing Cultural Practices in Technology
Investigating how cultural practices co-evolve with technology can provide insights into maximizing innovation opportunities. This includes understanding historical examples where cultural variations successfully exploited technological advancements .

5. Automation and Data Pipeline Development
The automation of the core ontologization process into a data pipeline has been achieved, but there is room for further development. This includes refining the pipeline to enhance its efficiency and effectiveness in handling both structured and unstructured data .

By focusing on these areas, the design space for ontologization practices can be significantly expanded, leading to more effective methodologies and practices in the field.


Introduction
Background
Overview of current ontologization practices
Importance of ontologization in digitalization
Objective
To propose a broader approach to ontologization design
To emphasize the strategic role of ontologization in digitalization
Method
Theoretical Framework
Integration of philosophy, logic, software architecture, accounting, and cybernetics
Case Study: bCLEARer
Description of bCLEARer as a case study
Analysis of its ontologization process
Evolutionary Context
Understanding new practices within digitalization's evolution
Importance of setting an evolutionary context for ontologization
Designing Ontologization Processes
Strategic Tool for Digitalization
Leveraging digitalization's opportunities through ontologization
Comprehensive Approach
Importance of a more comprehensive approach to managing the ontologization process
Quality of Ontologies
Impact of the ontologization process on the quality of resulting ontologies
Formalization Processes
Advancements Needed
Recognition of the need for advancements in formalization processes
Supporting Works
References to works across philosophy, logic, software architecture, accounting, and cybernetics
Conclusion
Summary of the Broader Approach
Future Directions
Implications for future research and practice in ontologization
Basic info
papers
artificial intelligence
Advanced features
Insights
What is the main idea of the paper regarding ontologization?
What is the significance of setting an evolutionary context for understanding new practices in digitalization?
How does the paper argue for a more comprehensive approach to managing the ontologization process?
How does the paper propose to expand the design space for ontologization?

Extending the design space of ontologization practices: Using bCLEARer as an example

Chris Partridge, Andrew Mitchell, Sergio de Cesare, John Beverley·January 30, 2025

Summary

The paper expands on the design space for ontologization, proposing a broader approach than current practices. It emphasizes designing ontologization processes, using bCLEARer as an example, and argues for setting an evolutionary context to understand new practices within digitalization's evolution. Ontologization is framed as a strategic tool for leveraging digitalization's opportunities. The paper advocates for a more comprehensive approach to managing the ontologization process, recognizing its impact on the quality of the resulting ontologies. It highlights the need for advancements in formalization processes and references works across philosophy, logic, software architecture, accounting, and cybernetics to support this.
Mind map
Overview of current ontologization practices
Importance of ontologization in digitalization
Background
To propose a broader approach to ontologization design
To emphasize the strategic role of ontologization in digitalization
Objective
Introduction
Integration of philosophy, logic, software architecture, accounting, and cybernetics
Theoretical Framework
Description of bCLEARer as a case study
Analysis of its ontologization process
Case Study: bCLEARer
Understanding new practices within digitalization's evolution
Importance of setting an evolutionary context for ontologization
Evolutionary Context
Method
Leveraging digitalization's opportunities through ontologization
Strategic Tool for Digitalization
Importance of a more comprehensive approach to managing the ontologization process
Comprehensive Approach
Impact of the ontologization process on the quality of resulting ontologies
Quality of Ontologies
Designing Ontologization Processes
Recognition of the need for advancements in formalization processes
Advancements Needed
References to works across philosophy, logic, software architecture, accounting, and cybernetics
Supporting Works
Formalization Processes
Summary of the Broader Approach
Implications for future research and practice in ontologization
Future Directions
Conclusion
Outline
Introduction
Background
Overview of current ontologization practices
Importance of ontologization in digitalization
Objective
To propose a broader approach to ontologization design
To emphasize the strategic role of ontologization in digitalization
Method
Theoretical Framework
Integration of philosophy, logic, software architecture, accounting, and cybernetics
Case Study: bCLEARer
Description of bCLEARer as a case study
Analysis of its ontologization process
Evolutionary Context
Understanding new practices within digitalization's evolution
Importance of setting an evolutionary context for ontologization
Designing Ontologization Processes
Strategic Tool for Digitalization
Leveraging digitalization's opportunities through ontologization
Comprehensive Approach
Importance of a more comprehensive approach to managing the ontologization process
Quality of Ontologies
Impact of the ontologization process on the quality of resulting ontologies
Formalization Processes
Advancements Needed
Recognition of the need for advancements in formalization processes
Supporting Works
References to works across philosophy, logic, software architecture, accounting, and cybernetics
Conclusion
Summary of the Broader Approach
Future Directions
Implications for future research and practice in ontologization
Key findings
2

Paper digest

What problem does the paper attempt to solve? Is this a new problem?

The paper addresses the issue of design poverty in formal ontologization processes, highlighting the need for a more engineered approach to both the processes and products involved in ontologization. It suggests that current methodologies do not fully exploit the potential of the design space available for ontologization practices, particularly in the context of digitalization .

This problem is not entirely new; however, the paper proposes a radical expansion of the design space by introducing the bCLEARer methodology as an outlier approach that can enhance the ontologization process. It emphasizes the importance of contextual scaffolding and evolutionary perspectives to better understand and leverage the opportunities presented by digitalization . Thus, while the problem of optimizing ontologization practices has been recognized, the specific framing and proposed solutions in this paper offer a fresh perspective on how to address it effectively.


What scientific hypothesis does this paper seek to validate?

The paper seeks to validate the hypothesis that the bCLEARer framework can enhance the process of digitalization by systematically finding and exploiting opportunities for computerized and ontologized digitalization. It emphasizes the importance of co-evolution between technology and cultural practices, suggesting that the evolution of cultural practices is crucial for successfully leveraging technological innovations . Additionally, it discusses the role of evolutionary contingency in innovation, highlighting how both macro- and micro-evolutionary factors influence the outcomes of digitalization efforts .


What new ideas, methods, or models does the paper propose? What are the characteristics and advantages compared to previous methods?

The paper "Extending the design space of ontologization practices: Using bCLEARer as an example" proposes several new ideas, methods, and models aimed at enriching the ontologization process and adapting it to the evolving landscape of digitalization. Below is a detailed analysis of these proposals:

1. Expansion of the Design Space

The authors argue for a broader design space for ontologization practices, suggesting that current methodologies are limited. They advocate for the exploration of radical new practices that can be integrated into the ontologization process, which they believe is essential for leveraging the opportunities presented by digitalization .

2. Introduction of the bCLEARer Methodology

The paper introduces the bCLEARer methodology as an outlier approach to ontologization. This methodology is characterized by its ability to extend and enrich the information transmission process while iterating it, mimicking the evolution of multiple generations within a single transmission. This iterative process is seen as a way to increase the pace of innovation and adapt to uncertainties in the digital landscape .

3. Contextual Scaffolding

The authors emphasize the importance of contextual scaffolding in the ontologization process. They argue that setting the right context can significantly impact the success of ontologization efforts. By situating digitalization within an evolutionary framework, they provide a perspective that helps understand the nature of new practices and their implications for information evolution [citation:1 The paper "Extending the design space of ontologization practices: Using bCLEARer as an example" outlines several characteristics and advantages of the bCLEARer methodology compared to previous ontologization methods. Below is a detailed analysis based on the content of the paper.

Characteristics of bCLEARer Methodology

  1. Iterative Information Transmission
    The bCLEARer methodology emphasizes an iterative approach to information transmission, which allows for the evolution of multiple generations within a single transmission. This mimics natural evolutionary processes, enabling continuous improvement and adaptation of the information being processed .

  2. Inclusion of Full Data Sets
    Unlike traditional methodologies that often exclude data from the ontologization process, bCLEARer includes the full data set from the outset. This all-or-nothing approach ensures that no level of generality is overlooked, allowing for a more comprehensive understanding of the information landscape .

  3. Pipeline Architecture
    The bCLEARer process utilizes a pipeline (pipe-and-filter) architecture, which facilitates a structured flow of data through various processing components. This architecture is flexible and can evolve over time, adapting to the specific needs of the project .

  4. Contextual Scaffolding
    The methodology incorporates contextual scaffolding, which situates digitalization within an evolutionary framework. This perspective helps to better understand the nature of new practices and their implications for information evolution .

Advantages Over Previous Methods

  1. Enhanced Adaptability
    The iterative nature of bCLEARer allows for rapid adaptation to changes and uncertainties in the digital landscape. This contrasts with traditional methods that may be more rigid and less responsive to evolving needs .

  2. Comprehensive Data Utilization
    By including all data levels in the ontologization process, bCLEARer enhances the richness and accuracy of the resulting ontologies. Previous methodologies often scoped out critical data levels, leading to potential gaps in understanding .

  3. Facilitated Innovation
    The design choices in bCLEARer are aimed at increasing the pace of innovation by systematically leading to new opportunities. This structured approach reduces the randomness associated with innovation, making it easier to identify and exploit potential advancements .

  4. Evolutionary Perspective
    The evolutionary context provided by bCLEARer positions ontologization as a strategic tool for leveraging digitalization opportunities. This broader perspective allows practitioners to see ontologization as part of a larger information evolutionary process, enhancing its relevance and applicability .

  5. Flexibility in Design
    The pipeline architecture of bCLEARer allows for a flexible arrangement of components that can evolve based on project needs. This flexibility is a significant advantage over traditional methodologies that may have a more fixed structure .

Conclusion

In summary, the bCLEARer methodology presents a significant advancement in ontologization practices by incorporating iterative processes, comprehensive data inclusion, and a flexible architecture. These characteristics not only enhance adaptability and innovation but also provide a richer context for understanding the implications of digitalization in the ontologization process .


Do any related researches exist? Who are the noteworthy researchers on this topic in this field?What is the key to the solution mentioned in the paper?

Related Researches and Noteworthy Researchers

The paper discusses various methodologies and frameworks related to ontology development and management, indicating that there is a significant body of research in this field. Noteworthy researchers include:

  • C. Partridge, who has contributed extensively to the understanding of ontologies and their applications in various domains .
  • M. Uschold and M. King, known for their work on methodologies for building ontologies .
  • J. Mokyr, who has explored the historical context of innovation, which is relevant to the evolution of ontological practices .

Key to the Solution

The key to the solution mentioned in the paper revolves around the concept of information evolution. The authors suggest that understanding digitalization as a part of the broader evolution of information transmission is critical. They emphasize that computerization and ontologization are essential cultural practices that co-evolve with digitalization, highlighting the importance of context in successfully implementing ontological frameworks .


How were the experiments in the paper designed?

The experiments in the paper were designed using the bCLEARer methodology, which serves as an outlier approach to systematically find and exploit opportunities for computerized and ontologized digitalization. This methodology emphasizes the importance of both macro- and micro-evolutionary contingency, recognizing that the evolution of cultural practices and technology must co-evolve to successfully exploit innovation opportunities .

The design process involves creating a framework that maximizes the chances of identifying and utilizing general and specific opportunities within the digitalization context. This is achieved by partitioning the design space along two dimensions: levels of generality and the journey to digitalization, which includes various evolutionary steps from traditional methods to modern computing technologies .

Furthermore, the bCLEARer pipeline operates in a controlled environment (in vitro) while also being tested in real-world scenarios (in vivo), ensuring that the innovations are relevant and applicable .


What is the dataset used for quantitative evaluation? Is the code open source?

The dataset used for quantitative evaluation in the bCLEARer approach typically includes one or more datasets that may consist of both structured and unstructured data, although structured data is preferred . This dataset undergoes a regimented evolution to achieve a more digitally aligned state .

Regarding the code, there are open-source examples of the bCLEARer approach available on GitHub, which can be accessed at the provided link .


Do the experiments and results in the paper provide good support for the scientific hypotheses that need to be verified? Please analyze.

The paper discusses the concept of evolutionary contingency and its implications for innovation, particularly in the context of the bCLEARer framework. It highlights the uncertainties surrounding innovation and how these uncertainties can be framed as contingency, recognizing that evolution is sensitive to historical paths and chance .

The experiments and results presented in the paper suggest that bCLEARer can effectively extend and enrich the information transmission process, mimicking the evolution of multiple generations within a single transmission . This indicates a systematic approach to finding and exploiting opportunities for digitalization, which aligns with the scientific hypotheses regarding the potential for innovation in a structured environment .

However, the paper also emphasizes the importance of cultural practices co-evolving with technology to fully exploit innovation opportunities . This suggests that while the bCLEARer framework may provide a robust method for identifying opportunities, the actual realization of these opportunities is contingent upon broader socio-cultural factors, which may not be fully addressed in the experimental results.

In conclusion, while the experiments and results provide a solid foundation for the hypotheses regarding the bCLEARer framework's effectiveness in fostering innovation, the broader implications of cultural co-evolution and the role of chance in evolutionary processes indicate that further verification and exploration are necessary to fully support these scientific hypotheses .


What are the contributions of this paper?

The paper titled "Extending the design space of ontologization practices: Using bCLEARer as an example" makes several key contributions:

  1. Contextual Framework: It emphasizes the importance of setting the right context for success in ontologization practices, suggesting that an evolutionary perspective on information transmission is crucial .

  2. Digitalization and Ontologization: The paper situates digitalization as a significant evolutionary step in information transmission, framing ontologization as a cultural practice that coevolves with digitalization .

  3. Methodological Insights: It introduces the bCLEARer methodology as an outlier approach to ontologization, providing a contrast to mainstream methodologies and highlighting the need for innovative practices in the field .

  4. Design Space Exploration: The authors discuss the potential for expanding the design space of ontologization practices, advocating for the exploration of new methodologies that can better exploit emerging opportunities in digitalization .

  5. Interdisciplinary Connections: The paper connects ontologization to broader themes in information evolution, suggesting that understanding these connections can enhance the effectiveness of ontological practices .

These contributions aim to encourage the community to adopt a wider range of practices and to rethink the foundational aspects of ontologization in the context of digital transformation.


What work can be continued in depth?

To continue work in depth, several areas can be explored based on the ontologization practices and methodologies discussed in the context:

1. Engineering of Ontologization Processes
There is a significant opportunity to develop a more engineered ontologization process. Current methodologies are described as design poor, indicating a need for a systematic approach to enhance the quality of these processes .

2. Exploration of bCLEARer Methodology
The bCLEARer methodology serves as an outlier example that has evolved over three decades. Further research can focus on its application across various situations, including legacy system migration and quality control of existing systems .

3. Contextual Scaffolding for Digitalization
Setting the right context for ontologization is crucial. This involves understanding digitalization as part of a broader evolutionary perspective, which can help in identifying new practices and opportunities for exploitation .

4. Addressing Cultural Practices in Technology
Investigating how cultural practices co-evolve with technology can provide insights into maximizing innovation opportunities. This includes understanding historical examples where cultural variations successfully exploited technological advancements .

5. Automation and Data Pipeline Development
The automation of the core ontologization process into a data pipeline has been achieved, but there is room for further development. This includes refining the pipeline to enhance its efficiency and effectiveness in handling both structured and unstructured data .

By focusing on these areas, the design space for ontologization practices can be significantly expanded, leading to more effective methodologies and practices in the field.

Scan the QR code to ask more questions about the paper
© 2025 Powerdrill. All rights reserved.