$\textit{Refiner}$: Restructure Retrieval Content Efficiently to Advance Question-Answering Capabilities

Zhonghao Li, Xuming Hu, Aiwei Liu, Kening Zheng, Sirui Huang, Hui Xiong·June 17, 2024

Summary

The paper introduces Refiner, an end-to-end extract-and-restructure approach for Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems. It addresses LLMs' limitations in handling knowledge-intensive tasks by adaptively extracting and structuring query-relevant content, improving answer accuracy and reducing hallucinations. A 7B-parameter Refiner significantly enhances downstream LLM performance, outperforming state-of-the-art methods in multi-hop QA tasks with a 80.5% token reduction and 1.6-7.0% improvement margin. The model is versatile, easily integrating into open-source frameworks, and shown to be effective in tasks like PopQA, TriviaQA, and HotpotQA, while also addressing the issue of lengthy and noisy document content. Ablation studies and comparisons with other models demonstrate the model's strength in context extraction and compression.

Key findings

5

Paper digest

What problem does the paper attempt to solve? Is this a new problem?

The paper aims to address the issue of Large Language Models (LLMs) struggling to recognize scattered key information, known as the "lost-in-the-middle" syndrome, by proposing a novel end-to-end extract-and-restructure paradigm called Refiner. This problem is not entirely new, as previous studies have highlighted the challenge of LLMs in effectively utilizing information from document chunks and recognizing key details . The Refiner approach focuses on restructuring content post-retrieval to help LLMs identify and differentiate key information more effectively, thereby enhancing downstream language model performance .


What scientific hypothesis does this paper seek to validate?

This paper seeks to validate the scientific hypothesis that restructuring retrieval content efficiently through an end-to-end extract-and-restructure paradigm, as proposed by Refiner, can enhance the performance of downstream Large Language Models (LLMs) in question-answering tasks by helping them recognize and utilize key information more effectively .


What new ideas, methods, or models does the paper propose? What are the characteristics and advantages compared to previous methods?

The paper proposes a novel approach called Refiner, which aims to restructure retrieval content efficiently to enhance question-answering capabilities . This approach addresses the limitations faced by Large Language Models (LLMs) in recognizing scattered key information, known as the "lost-in-the-middle" syndrome, by extracting and structuring query-relevant contents into distinct sections based on relatedness . Refiner leverages a single decoder-only LLM to adaptively extract verbatim query-relevant contents along with necessary context and section them based on interconnectedness to highlight information distinction . The proposed method emphasizes information relatedness among document chunks, making it easier for downstream LLMs to comprehend and differentiate key information effectively .

Additionally, the paper introduces the concept of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) to expand LLM knowledge by incorporating external document chunks semantically similar to the query . This method aims to generate more faithful and generalizable outputs by retrieving relevant information from external sources and integrating it into LLMs . The paper also discusses advanced RAG approaches, such as query rewriting mechanisms and self-reflection tokens, to enhance the performance of RAG by enabling on-demand retrieval and selecting optimal answers from document chunks . Furthermore, the paper highlights the importance of compressing input prompts using language models to exclude irrelevant content, reduce computational costs, and improve overall performance . Refiner introduces several key characteristics and advantages compared to previous methods outlined in the paper :

  1. Structured Output: Refiner provides structured and context-completed output, enhancing downstream Language Models' (LMs) comprehension by organizing query-relevant content into distinct sections based on relatedness . This structured output aids in disseminating information effortlessly by downstream LMs .

  2. Content Restructuring: Refiner mitigates the "lost-in-the-middle" syndrome observed in downstream LMs by adaptively extracting and structuring query-relevant contents, thereby improving key information recognition .

  3. Noise Tolerance: Refiner is less susceptible to noisy and lengthy content, as it significantly reduces prompt length while maintaining downstream LM performance, even when additional irrelevant document chunks are appended .

  4. Performance Improvement: Empirical results demonstrate that Refiner significantly enhances answer accuracy for downstream LMs, surpassing previous state-of-the-art RAG solutions and concurrent prompt compressing work by a margin of 2.2%-7.0% on multi-hop QA datasets and achieving comparable accuracy on single-hop QA datasets .

  5. Plug-and-Play Nature: Refiner's plug-and-play nature makes it ideal for API-based models without parameter access, allowing seamless integration across different upstream retrieval systems and downstream LMs .

  6. Token Reduction: Refiner achieves a substantial token reduction of 80.5% on average compared to the second-best solution, demonstrating efficiency in compressing information from document chunks .

  7. Performance Stability: Refiner exhibits stability in various RAG settings, maintaining consistent in-task performance across different content lengths and downstream LMs .

In summary, Refiner's structured output, noise tolerance, performance improvement, and plug-and-play nature make it a robust and effective solution for enhancing question-answering capabilities compared to previous methods, as detailed in the paper .


Do any related researches exist? Who are the noteworthy researchers on this topic in this field?What is the key to the solution mentioned in the paper?

Several related research papers exist in the field of restructuring retrieval content to advance question-answering capabilities. Noteworthy researchers in this area include Zhang, Yafu Li, Leyang Cui, Deng Cai, Lemao Liu, Tingchen Fu, Xinting Huang, Enbo Zhao, Yu Zhang, Yulong Chen, Longyue Wang, Anh Tuan Luu, Wei Bi, Freda Shi, Shuming Shi, Sizhe Zhou, Yu Meng, Bowen Jin, Jiawei Han, Konrad Zuchniak, Haffari, Fangyuan Xu, Weijia Shi, Eunsol Choi, Shi-Qi Yan, Jia-Chen Gu, Yun Zhu, Zhen-Hua Ling, Haoyan Yang, Zhitao Li, Yong Zhang, Jianzong Wang, Ning Cheng, Ming Li, Jing Xiao, Zhilin Yang, Peng Qi, Saizheng Zhang, Yoshua Bengio, William W. Cohen, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, Christopher D. Manning, Shunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran, Thomas L. Griffiths, Yuan Cao, Karthik Narasimhan, Ori Yoran, Tomer Wolfson, Ori Ram, Jonathan Berant, Tianjun Zhang, Shishir G. Patil, Naman Jain, Sheng Shen, Matei Zaharia, Ion Stoica, Joseph E. Gonzalez, Yue Zhang, Yun Xiong, Xinyu Gao, Kangxiang Jia, Jinliu Pan, Yuxi Bi, Yi Dai, Jiawei Sun, Meng Wang, Haofen Wang, Kelvin Guu, Kenton Lee, Zora Tung, Panupong Pasupat, Ming-Wei Chang, Xanh Ho, Anh-Khoa Duong Nguyen, Saku Sugawara, Akiko Aizawa, Edward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu, Yuanzhi Li, Shean Wang, Lu Wang, Weizhu Chen, Hanxu Hu, Pinzhen Chen, Edoardo M. Ponti, Gautier Izacard, Mathilde Caron, Lucas Hosseini, Sebastian Riedel, Piotr Bojanowski, Armand Joulin, Edouard Grave, Ziwei Ji, Nayeon .

The key to the solution mentioned in the paper is the development of Refiner, an end-to-end extract-and-restructure paradigm that aims to address the limitations faced by Large Language Models (LLMs) in recognizing scattered key information, known as the "lost-in-the-middle" syndrome. Refiner leverages a single decoder-only LLM to adaptively extract query-relevant contents along with necessary context, and section them based on their interconnectedness to highlight information distinction. This restructuring process helps downstream LLMs effectively align with the original context and improve answer accuracy in various question-answering tasks .


How were the experiments in the paper designed?

The experiments in the paper were designed to evaluate the Refiner and downstream language models (LMs) on various open-domain question-answering tasks, including short-form QA, long-form QA, and multi-hop QA tasks . The evaluation involved conducting zero-shot evaluations where prompts only provided instructions on tasks and outputs, contrasting with few-shot examples . The experiments utilized accuracy as the evaluation metric across all test datasets, although it was noted that this metric may not fully reflect the performance of the RAG system due to its focus on the existence of answer strings rather than semantic coherence . Additionally, the experiments included tasks such as single-hop QA with datasets like PopQA, TriviaQA-unfiltered, and ARC Challenge, as well as multi-hop QA tasks with datasets like HotpotQA-dev-distractor and 2Wiki-dev . The experiments aimed to assess the effectiveness of the Refiner paradigm in enhancing the performance of downstream LMs and its relative efficacy compared to other advanced RAG solutions and concurrent compressors .


What is the dataset used for quantitative evaluation? Is the code open source?

The dataset used for quantitative evaluation includes the ARC Challenge train, PubHealth train, and TriviaQA train datasets . The code for Refiner is not explicitly mentioned to be open source in the provided context .


Do the experiments and results in the paper provide good support for the scientific hypotheses that need to be verified? Please analyze.

The experiments and results presented in the paper provide strong support for the scientific hypotheses that needed verification. The paper outlines a detailed evaluation methodology for the ARC Challenge task, highlighting the importance of revising evaluation metrics to avoid over-evaluation of model performance . The experiments conducted evaluate the Refiner and downstream language models on various open-domain question-answering tasks, including short-form QA, long-form QA, and multi-hop QA tasks . These experiments include zero-shot evaluations and emphasize the need to consider semantic coherence in addition to accuracy when evaluating the performance of the models . Furthermore, the paper discusses the structure correction process after outputs are generated by teacher models, demonstrating a meticulous approach to refining and filtering contents to align with the proposed principles .

Overall, the experiments and results in the paper demonstrate a thorough and systematic approach to evaluating question-answering capabilities, providing robust support for the scientific hypotheses under investigation. The methodologies employed, including code comparisons and training details, contribute to the credibility and reliability of the findings, enhancing the validity of the scientific hypotheses being tested.


What are the contributions of this paper?

The paper "Refiner: Restructure Retrieval Content Efficiently to Advance Question-Answering Capabilities" makes several key contributions:

  • Introduction of Refiner: The paper introduces Refiner, an end-to-end extract-and-restructure paradigm designed to enhance the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) in question-answering tasks by restructuring content to highlight key information .
  • Improved Downstream LLM Performance: Refiner significantly improves answer accuracy in downstream LLMs, outperforming other state-of-the-art retrieval-augmented generation approaches in various single-hop and multi-hop question-answering tasks .
  • Structured Output: Refiner provides a structured output that allows for easy disassembly of sections, titles, and contents, enabling seamless conversion into various alternative structures to enhance downstream LLM performance .
  • Content Length Tolerance: The Refiner-augmented system is less susceptible to noisy and lengthy content, maintaining performance even when additional irrelevant document chunks are appended, thereby alleviating the "lost-in-the-middle" phenomenon observed in downstream LLMs .
  • Resilience to RAG Systems: Refiner demonstrates stability and effectiveness across different Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) settings, showcasing consistent in-task performance regardless of variations in content lengths and downstream LLMs .

What work can be continued in depth?

Further research can be conducted to explore the robustness of the Refiner model on alternative input structures, such as table data or domain-specific documents, as its effectiveness has not been tested in these scenarios . Additionally, there is a need to investigate the correctness of the generated structural output from the model more directly, as evaluating this aspect still requires further study . Moreover, the post-retrieval process in the context of RAG systems has not been extensively explored by academia, presenting a significant area for potential research and development .

Tables

4

Introduction
Background
LLM limitations in knowledge-intensive tasks
Importance of handling query-relevant content
Objective
Improve answer accuracy and reduce hallucinations in LLMs
Enhance downstream performance with adaptive extraction and structuring
Method
Data Collection
Retrieval strategy for query-relevant content
Datasets used: Multi-hop QA (e.g., PopQA, TriviaQA, HotpotQA)
Data Preprocessing
Adaptive content extraction techniques
Noise reduction and compression methods
Model Architecture
7B-parameter Refiner model design
Integration with open-source frameworks
Performance Evaluation
Multi-hop QA results: 80.5% token reduction, 1.6-7.0% improvement margin
Comparison with state-of-the-art methods
Ablation Studies
Analysis of context extraction and compression techniques
Impact of model components on overall performance
Applications and Versatility
Success in various knowledge-intensive tasks
Integration into existing systems
Limitations and Future Work
Addressing challenges with lengthy and noisy documents
Potential improvements and future directions
Conclusion
Summary of key contributions
Implications for the retrieval-augmented generation field
Basic info
papers
computation and language
artificial intelligence
Advanced features
Insights
In which areas or datasets does the Refiner model demonstrate its effectiveness, aside from multi-hop QA?
What improvements does a 7B-parameter Refiner bring to multi-hop QA tasks compared to state-of-the-art methods?
What is the primary focus of the Refiner introduced in the paper?
How does Refiner address the limitations of LLMs in knowledge-intensive tasks?

$\textit{Refiner}$: Restructure Retrieval Content Efficiently to Advance Question-Answering Capabilities

Zhonghao Li, Xuming Hu, Aiwei Liu, Kening Zheng, Sirui Huang, Hui Xiong·June 17, 2024

Summary

The paper introduces Refiner, an end-to-end extract-and-restructure approach for Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems. It addresses LLMs' limitations in handling knowledge-intensive tasks by adaptively extracting and structuring query-relevant content, improving answer accuracy and reducing hallucinations. A 7B-parameter Refiner significantly enhances downstream LLM performance, outperforming state-of-the-art methods in multi-hop QA tasks with a 80.5% token reduction and 1.6-7.0% improvement margin. The model is versatile, easily integrating into open-source frameworks, and shown to be effective in tasks like PopQA, TriviaQA, and HotpotQA, while also addressing the issue of lengthy and noisy document content. Ablation studies and comparisons with other models demonstrate the model's strength in context extraction and compression.
Mind map
Impact of model components on overall performance
Analysis of context extraction and compression techniques
Comparison with state-of-the-art methods
Multi-hop QA results: 80.5% token reduction, 1.6-7.0% improvement margin
Integration with open-source frameworks
7B-parameter Refiner model design
Noise reduction and compression methods
Adaptive content extraction techniques
Datasets used: Multi-hop QA (e.g., PopQA, TriviaQA, HotpotQA)
Retrieval strategy for query-relevant content
Enhance downstream performance with adaptive extraction and structuring
Improve answer accuracy and reduce hallucinations in LLMs
Importance of handling query-relevant content
LLM limitations in knowledge-intensive tasks
Implications for the retrieval-augmented generation field
Summary of key contributions
Potential improvements and future directions
Addressing challenges with lengthy and noisy documents
Integration into existing systems
Success in various knowledge-intensive tasks
Ablation Studies
Performance Evaluation
Model Architecture
Data Preprocessing
Data Collection
Objective
Background
Conclusion
Limitations and Future Work
Applications and Versatility
Method
Introduction
Outline
Introduction
Background
LLM limitations in knowledge-intensive tasks
Importance of handling query-relevant content
Objective
Improve answer accuracy and reduce hallucinations in LLMs
Enhance downstream performance with adaptive extraction and structuring
Method
Data Collection
Retrieval strategy for query-relevant content
Datasets used: Multi-hop QA (e.g., PopQA, TriviaQA, HotpotQA)
Data Preprocessing
Adaptive content extraction techniques
Noise reduction and compression methods
Model Architecture
7B-parameter Refiner model design
Integration with open-source frameworks
Performance Evaluation
Multi-hop QA results: 80.5% token reduction, 1.6-7.0% improvement margin
Comparison with state-of-the-art methods
Ablation Studies
Analysis of context extraction and compression techniques
Impact of model components on overall performance
Applications and Versatility
Success in various knowledge-intensive tasks
Integration into existing systems
Limitations and Future Work
Addressing challenges with lengthy and noisy documents
Potential improvements and future directions
Conclusion
Summary of key contributions
Implications for the retrieval-augmented generation field
Key findings
5

Paper digest

What problem does the paper attempt to solve? Is this a new problem?

The paper aims to address the issue of Large Language Models (LLMs) struggling to recognize scattered key information, known as the "lost-in-the-middle" syndrome, by proposing a novel end-to-end extract-and-restructure paradigm called Refiner. This problem is not entirely new, as previous studies have highlighted the challenge of LLMs in effectively utilizing information from document chunks and recognizing key details . The Refiner approach focuses on restructuring content post-retrieval to help LLMs identify and differentiate key information more effectively, thereby enhancing downstream language model performance .


What scientific hypothesis does this paper seek to validate?

This paper seeks to validate the scientific hypothesis that restructuring retrieval content efficiently through an end-to-end extract-and-restructure paradigm, as proposed by Refiner, can enhance the performance of downstream Large Language Models (LLMs) in question-answering tasks by helping them recognize and utilize key information more effectively .


What new ideas, methods, or models does the paper propose? What are the characteristics and advantages compared to previous methods?

The paper proposes a novel approach called Refiner, which aims to restructure retrieval content efficiently to enhance question-answering capabilities . This approach addresses the limitations faced by Large Language Models (LLMs) in recognizing scattered key information, known as the "lost-in-the-middle" syndrome, by extracting and structuring query-relevant contents into distinct sections based on relatedness . Refiner leverages a single decoder-only LLM to adaptively extract verbatim query-relevant contents along with necessary context and section them based on interconnectedness to highlight information distinction . The proposed method emphasizes information relatedness among document chunks, making it easier for downstream LLMs to comprehend and differentiate key information effectively .

Additionally, the paper introduces the concept of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) to expand LLM knowledge by incorporating external document chunks semantically similar to the query . This method aims to generate more faithful and generalizable outputs by retrieving relevant information from external sources and integrating it into LLMs . The paper also discusses advanced RAG approaches, such as query rewriting mechanisms and self-reflection tokens, to enhance the performance of RAG by enabling on-demand retrieval and selecting optimal answers from document chunks . Furthermore, the paper highlights the importance of compressing input prompts using language models to exclude irrelevant content, reduce computational costs, and improve overall performance . Refiner introduces several key characteristics and advantages compared to previous methods outlined in the paper :

  1. Structured Output: Refiner provides structured and context-completed output, enhancing downstream Language Models' (LMs) comprehension by organizing query-relevant content into distinct sections based on relatedness . This structured output aids in disseminating information effortlessly by downstream LMs .

  2. Content Restructuring: Refiner mitigates the "lost-in-the-middle" syndrome observed in downstream LMs by adaptively extracting and structuring query-relevant contents, thereby improving key information recognition .

  3. Noise Tolerance: Refiner is less susceptible to noisy and lengthy content, as it significantly reduces prompt length while maintaining downstream LM performance, even when additional irrelevant document chunks are appended .

  4. Performance Improvement: Empirical results demonstrate that Refiner significantly enhances answer accuracy for downstream LMs, surpassing previous state-of-the-art RAG solutions and concurrent prompt compressing work by a margin of 2.2%-7.0% on multi-hop QA datasets and achieving comparable accuracy on single-hop QA datasets .

  5. Plug-and-Play Nature: Refiner's plug-and-play nature makes it ideal for API-based models without parameter access, allowing seamless integration across different upstream retrieval systems and downstream LMs .

  6. Token Reduction: Refiner achieves a substantial token reduction of 80.5% on average compared to the second-best solution, demonstrating efficiency in compressing information from document chunks .

  7. Performance Stability: Refiner exhibits stability in various RAG settings, maintaining consistent in-task performance across different content lengths and downstream LMs .

In summary, Refiner's structured output, noise tolerance, performance improvement, and plug-and-play nature make it a robust and effective solution for enhancing question-answering capabilities compared to previous methods, as detailed in the paper .


Do any related researches exist? Who are the noteworthy researchers on this topic in this field?What is the key to the solution mentioned in the paper?

Several related research papers exist in the field of restructuring retrieval content to advance question-answering capabilities. Noteworthy researchers in this area include Zhang, Yafu Li, Leyang Cui, Deng Cai, Lemao Liu, Tingchen Fu, Xinting Huang, Enbo Zhao, Yu Zhang, Yulong Chen, Longyue Wang, Anh Tuan Luu, Wei Bi, Freda Shi, Shuming Shi, Sizhe Zhou, Yu Meng, Bowen Jin, Jiawei Han, Konrad Zuchniak, Haffari, Fangyuan Xu, Weijia Shi, Eunsol Choi, Shi-Qi Yan, Jia-Chen Gu, Yun Zhu, Zhen-Hua Ling, Haoyan Yang, Zhitao Li, Yong Zhang, Jianzong Wang, Ning Cheng, Ming Li, Jing Xiao, Zhilin Yang, Peng Qi, Saizheng Zhang, Yoshua Bengio, William W. Cohen, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, Christopher D. Manning, Shunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran, Thomas L. Griffiths, Yuan Cao, Karthik Narasimhan, Ori Yoran, Tomer Wolfson, Ori Ram, Jonathan Berant, Tianjun Zhang, Shishir G. Patil, Naman Jain, Sheng Shen, Matei Zaharia, Ion Stoica, Joseph E. Gonzalez, Yue Zhang, Yun Xiong, Xinyu Gao, Kangxiang Jia, Jinliu Pan, Yuxi Bi, Yi Dai, Jiawei Sun, Meng Wang, Haofen Wang, Kelvin Guu, Kenton Lee, Zora Tung, Panupong Pasupat, Ming-Wei Chang, Xanh Ho, Anh-Khoa Duong Nguyen, Saku Sugawara, Akiko Aizawa, Edward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu, Yuanzhi Li, Shean Wang, Lu Wang, Weizhu Chen, Hanxu Hu, Pinzhen Chen, Edoardo M. Ponti, Gautier Izacard, Mathilde Caron, Lucas Hosseini, Sebastian Riedel, Piotr Bojanowski, Armand Joulin, Edouard Grave, Ziwei Ji, Nayeon .

The key to the solution mentioned in the paper is the development of Refiner, an end-to-end extract-and-restructure paradigm that aims to address the limitations faced by Large Language Models (LLMs) in recognizing scattered key information, known as the "lost-in-the-middle" syndrome. Refiner leverages a single decoder-only LLM to adaptively extract query-relevant contents along with necessary context, and section them based on their interconnectedness to highlight information distinction. This restructuring process helps downstream LLMs effectively align with the original context and improve answer accuracy in various question-answering tasks .


How were the experiments in the paper designed?

The experiments in the paper were designed to evaluate the Refiner and downstream language models (LMs) on various open-domain question-answering tasks, including short-form QA, long-form QA, and multi-hop QA tasks . The evaluation involved conducting zero-shot evaluations where prompts only provided instructions on tasks and outputs, contrasting with few-shot examples . The experiments utilized accuracy as the evaluation metric across all test datasets, although it was noted that this metric may not fully reflect the performance of the RAG system due to its focus on the existence of answer strings rather than semantic coherence . Additionally, the experiments included tasks such as single-hop QA with datasets like PopQA, TriviaQA-unfiltered, and ARC Challenge, as well as multi-hop QA tasks with datasets like HotpotQA-dev-distractor and 2Wiki-dev . The experiments aimed to assess the effectiveness of the Refiner paradigm in enhancing the performance of downstream LMs and its relative efficacy compared to other advanced RAG solutions and concurrent compressors .


What is the dataset used for quantitative evaluation? Is the code open source?

The dataset used for quantitative evaluation includes the ARC Challenge train, PubHealth train, and TriviaQA train datasets . The code for Refiner is not explicitly mentioned to be open source in the provided context .


Do the experiments and results in the paper provide good support for the scientific hypotheses that need to be verified? Please analyze.

The experiments and results presented in the paper provide strong support for the scientific hypotheses that needed verification. The paper outlines a detailed evaluation methodology for the ARC Challenge task, highlighting the importance of revising evaluation metrics to avoid over-evaluation of model performance . The experiments conducted evaluate the Refiner and downstream language models on various open-domain question-answering tasks, including short-form QA, long-form QA, and multi-hop QA tasks . These experiments include zero-shot evaluations and emphasize the need to consider semantic coherence in addition to accuracy when evaluating the performance of the models . Furthermore, the paper discusses the structure correction process after outputs are generated by teacher models, demonstrating a meticulous approach to refining and filtering contents to align with the proposed principles .

Overall, the experiments and results in the paper demonstrate a thorough and systematic approach to evaluating question-answering capabilities, providing robust support for the scientific hypotheses under investigation. The methodologies employed, including code comparisons and training details, contribute to the credibility and reliability of the findings, enhancing the validity of the scientific hypotheses being tested.


What are the contributions of this paper?

The paper "Refiner: Restructure Retrieval Content Efficiently to Advance Question-Answering Capabilities" makes several key contributions:

  • Introduction of Refiner: The paper introduces Refiner, an end-to-end extract-and-restructure paradigm designed to enhance the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) in question-answering tasks by restructuring content to highlight key information .
  • Improved Downstream LLM Performance: Refiner significantly improves answer accuracy in downstream LLMs, outperforming other state-of-the-art retrieval-augmented generation approaches in various single-hop and multi-hop question-answering tasks .
  • Structured Output: Refiner provides a structured output that allows for easy disassembly of sections, titles, and contents, enabling seamless conversion into various alternative structures to enhance downstream LLM performance .
  • Content Length Tolerance: The Refiner-augmented system is less susceptible to noisy and lengthy content, maintaining performance even when additional irrelevant document chunks are appended, thereby alleviating the "lost-in-the-middle" phenomenon observed in downstream LLMs .
  • Resilience to RAG Systems: Refiner demonstrates stability and effectiveness across different Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) settings, showcasing consistent in-task performance regardless of variations in content lengths and downstream LLMs .

What work can be continued in depth?

Further research can be conducted to explore the robustness of the Refiner model on alternative input structures, such as table data or domain-specific documents, as its effectiveness has not been tested in these scenarios . Additionally, there is a need to investigate the correctness of the generated structural output from the model more directly, as evaluating this aspect still requires further study . Moreover, the post-retrieval process in the context of RAG systems has not been extensively explored by academia, presenting a significant area for potential research and development .

Tables
4
Scan the QR code to ask more questions about the paper
© 2025 Powerdrill. All rights reserved.