VLind-Bench: Measuring Language Priors in Large Vision-Language Models

Kang-il Lee, Minbeom Kim, Minsung Kim, Dongryeol Lee, Hyukhun Koh, Kyomin Jung·June 13, 2024

Summary

VLind-Bench is a benchmark introduced to assess language priors in Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs), addressing their tendency to generate responses based on text patterns rather than image content. The benchmark evaluates four key areas: commonsense knowledge, visual perception, commonsense bias, and language prior. It reveals that existing LVLMs, except GPT-4, heavily rely on language priors, with smaller models showing more dependence. The study also finds that larger models like GPT-4o have reduced reliance and that RLHF techniques can help minimize this issue.VLind-Bench uses counterfactual images and factual tests to differentiate between biases, understanding, and visual recognition, providing a comprehensive framework for diagnosing and improving LVLMs. The benchmark dataset, available for research, includes various image styles and is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.

Key findings

3

Paper digest

What problem does the paper attempt to solve? Is this a new problem?

The paper aims to address the issue of language prior in Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs). This problem refers to the tendency of models to generate responses based solely on textual patterns, disregarding image information, which can lead to biases and hallucinations . While the problem of language prior has been recognized in the Visual Question Answering (VQA) community, the paper focuses on accurately measuring this issue in LVLMs, which has not been extensively explored before .


What scientific hypothesis does this paper seek to validate?

This paper aims to validate the scientific hypothesis related to measuring language priors in large vision-language models . The study focuses on evaluating the language priors, commonsense knowledge, and commonsense bias in these models through various tests and benchmarks . The goal is to assess the models' capabilities in understanding and responding to counterfactual and multimodal contexts, distinguishing between common sense knowledge and language priors .


What new ideas, methods, or models does the paper propose? What are the characteristics and advantages compared to previous methods?

The paper proposes several new ideas, methods, and models in the field of large vision-language models:

  • Empowering large language models with multimodality: The paper introduces the concept of empowering large language models with multimodality, focusing on enhancing the trustworthiness of these models through behavior alignment and fine-grained correctional human feedback .
  • Disentangling parametric and contextual knowledge: The paper presents the DisentQA model, which aims to disentangle parametric and contextual knowledge through counterfactual question answering .
  • Aligning multimodal language models: The paper introduces the RLAIF-V model, which focuses on aligning multimodal language models through open-source AI feedback to enhance trustworthiness .
  • Dataset for open-domain question answering under counterfactual presuppositions: The paper introduces the IfQA dataset, designed for open-domain question answering under counterfactual presuppositions .
  • Evaluation of pre-trained vision-language models: The paper discusses the ROME framework, which evaluates pre-trained vision-language models on reasoning beyond visual common sense .
  • Analyzing and mitigating object hallucination: The paper addresses the issue of object hallucination in large vision-language models and proposes methods to analyze and mitigate this phenomenon .
  • Enhancing vision-language understanding with advanced large language models: The paper introduces the MiniGPT-4 model, which aims to enhance vision-language understanding using advanced large language models .

These proposals and models contribute to advancing the capabilities and trustworthiness of large vision-language models through innovative approaches and methodologies . The paper introduces several novel characteristics and advantages compared to previous methods in the field of large vision-language models:

  • Behavior Alignment and Fine-Grained Correctional Human Feedback: The paper proposes empowering large language models with multimodality through behavior alignment and fine-grained correctional human feedback, aiming to enhance trustworthiness .
  • Disentangling Parametric and Contextual Knowledge: The DisentQA model presented in the paper focuses on disentangling parametric and contextual knowledge through counterfactual question answering, offering a unique approach to understanding language priors .
  • RLHF-V Methodologies: Models trained using RLHF-V methodologies, such as OmniLMM and MiniCPM, demonstrate superior performance by mitigating multimodal hallucination and reducing reliance on language priors .
  • Impact of Backbone LLMs: The paper evaluates the influence of backbone LLMs on LVLM performance, indicating that the absolute scale of the backbone LLMs and the training methodology have a more substantial impact on LVLM performance than the performance of the backbone LLMs themselves .
  • Superiority of LVLMs: In certain scenarios, LVLMs are shown to be superior to their original backbone LLMs on tasks encompassing the same content in both image and text formats, highlighting the effectiveness of LVLMs in specific contexts .

These characteristics and advantages underscore the innovative approaches and methodologies proposed in the paper, contributing to the advancement of large vision-language models in terms of trustworthiness, performance, and disentanglement of knowledge .


Do any related researches exist? Who are the noteworthy researchers on this topic in this field?What is the key to the solution mentioned in the paper?

Several related research papers exist in the field of large vision-language models. Noteworthy researchers in this area include T. Yu, Y. Yao, H. Zhang, T. He, Y. Han, G. Cui, J. Hu, Z. Liu, H.-T. Zheng, M. Sun, and T.-S. Chua , K. Zhou, E. Lai, W. B. A. Yeong, K. Mouratidis, and J. Jiang , and J. Zhou, X. Zhou, and T. Zhu . These researchers have contributed to various aspects of vision-language models, such as evaluating reasoning beyond visual common sense, object hallucination analysis, and disentangling parametric and contextual knowledge with counterfactual question answering.

The key to the solution mentioned in the paper involves aligning multimodal large language models through open-source AI feedback to enhance the trustworthiness of the models . This approach aims to improve the performance and reliability of large vision-language models by incorporating fine-grained correctional human feedback and behavior alignment strategies.


How were the experiments in the paper designed?

The experiments in the paper were designed to assess the performance of various large vision-language models (LVLMs) using different visual inputs and methodologies . The experiments aimed to evaluate the models' capabilities in tasks such as commonsense knowledge (CK) and commonsense bias (CB) without image inputs, ensuring reproducibility by conducting inferences using 4 NVIDIA RTX A6000 GPUs . The experiments also explored the impact of language priors on model performance, highlighting the reliance on language priors observed in most models, especially in open-source LVLMs compared to proprietary ones . Additionally, the experiments investigated the influence of backbone LVLMs on the performance of LVLMs, revealing that the scale and training methodology of the backbone LVLMs have a more significant impact on the final performance of LVLMs than the performance of the backbone LVLMs themselves .


What is the dataset used for quantitative evaluation? Is the code open source?

The dataset used for quantitative evaluation in the study is VLind-Bench . The code for evaluation is open source and can be accessed at the following GitHub repository: https://github.com/klee972/VLind-Bench .


Do the experiments and results in the paper provide good support for the scientific hypotheses that need to be verified? Please analyze.

The experiments and results presented in the paper provide substantial support for the scientific hypotheses that need to be verified. The study conducted a comprehensive evaluation of various large vision-language models (LVLMs) using the VLind-Bench dataset, focusing on aspects like commonsense knowledge, visual perception, and counterfactual reasoning . The experiments involved assessing the models' performance on different concepts such as climate, color, diet, folklore, habitat, history, landmark, location, size, time, and weight, revealing varying scores across these categories .

The analysis of the experimental results highlighted interesting findings, such as the models demonstrating lower scores in commonsense knowledge (SCK) but higher scores in visual perception (SVP), indicating a disparity in knowledge domains . Additionally, the comparison of LP and SLP scores revealed discrepancies in model performance, emphasizing the importance of pipelined evaluation for gaining insights beyond task-level assessments . These observations align with previous research and contribute to a deeper understanding of LVLM capabilities .

Moreover, the experiments conducted using different visual inputs, including plain white images and rendered text prompts, provided valuable insights into the models' responses and performance variations based on the type of visual input . By systematically evaluating the models across multiple dimensions and scenarios, the study effectively tested the hypotheses related to the models' language priors and multimodal capabilities . The detailed analysis of the experimental outcomes offers robust evidence supporting the scientific inquiries addressed in the research .


What are the contributions of this paper?

The paper makes several contributions:

  • It introduces the DisentQA framework, which aims to disentangle parametric and contextual knowledge through counterfactual question answering .
  • The paper provides insights into the performance of various large vision-language models (LVLMs) on different concepts such as climate, color, diet, folklore, habitat, history, landmark, location, size, time, and weight .
  • It highlights the deficiencies in commonsense knowledge in LVLMs, as indicated by low scores in commonsense knowledge (SCK) but relatively high scores in visual perception (SVP) .
  • The study reveals a lack of correlation between LP and SLP scores in certain models, indicating that pipelined evaluation offers additional information beyond task-level evaluation alone .
  • Additionally, the paper discusses the experimental results on VLind-Bench using various visual inputs like plain white images and rendered text prompts, showcasing the performance of models like GPT-4o, LLaVA-NEXT 72B, and OmniLMM 12B under different visual input conditions .

What work can be continued in depth?

To delve deeper into the field of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs), further research can be conducted in the following areas:

  • Exploring Counterfactual Contexts: Research can focus on developing benchmarks that utilize counterfactual contexts to assess the robustness and generalization capabilities of LVLMs . These benchmarks can help evaluate how well models incorporate augmented information when answering questions or solving tasks conditioned on counterfactual contexts .
  • Addressing Bias and Hallucination Issues: Investigating methods to mitigate bias and hallucination problems inherent in LVLMs is crucial for enhancing the reliability and accuracy of these models . By developing techniques to reduce reliance on language priors and commonsense biases, the performance of LVLMs can be improved .
  • Enhancing Multimodal Capabilities: Further advancements can be made in empowering LVLMs with multimodality to enable them to better understand and process information from different modalities such as text and images . This can lead to more effective vision-language learning and reasoning capabilities in LVLMs.
  • Evaluation and Analysis: Continued evaluation and analysis of LVLMs, particularly focusing on aspects like reasoning beyond visual common sense, object hallucination, and reasoning capabilities through counterfactual tasks, can provide valuable insights into the strengths and limitations of these models .
  • Model Trustworthiness: Research efforts can be directed towards enhancing the trustworthiness of LVLMs by aligning models through open-source AI feedback, fine-grained correctional human feedback, and behavior alignment to ensure reliable model performance .
  • Dataset Development: Creating specialized datasets for open-domain question answering under counterfactual presuppositions can further facilitate research in LVLMs and advance the capabilities of these models .

By focusing on these areas, researchers can contribute to the advancement and refinement of Large Vision-Language Models, paving the way for more sophisticated and reliable multimodal AI systems.


#VLind-Bench: A Benchmark for Assessing Language Priors in Large Vision-Language Models

Introduction
Background
Emergence of LVLMs and their reliance on text patterns
Importance of evaluating visual understanding in these models
Objective
To investigate language priors in LVLMs
To identify strengths and weaknesses of existing models
To assess the impact of RLHF techniques
Methodology
Data Collection
Counterfactual image generation
Factual and counterfactual test sets
Diverse image styles and scenarios
Data Preprocessing
Image and text data formatting
Annotation and labeling of test cases
Separation into evaluation areas (commonsense knowledge, visual perception, bias, language prior)
Evaluation Metrics
Accuracy scores for each area
Analysis of model responses to counterfactuals
Comparison between different model sizes
Results and Analysis
Model Performance
Commonsense knowledge: Assessing factual correctness
Visual perception: Model's ability to recognize objects and scenes
Commonsense bias: Identifying reliance on text patterns
Language prior: Quantifying the influence of language cues
GPT-4 Performance
Comparison with other LVLMs
Evidence of reduced language prior bias
RLHF Impact
Effectiveness of reinforcement learning for improving visual understanding
Changes in model behavior post-RLHF
Conclusion
Summary of findings and implications for LVLM development
Recommendations for future research and model improvements
Importance of addressing language priors for real-world applications
Availability
Benchmark dataset: CC BY-SA 4.0 license
Use cases and limitations discussed
Future Directions
Potential for combined vision-language models
Integration of RLHF techniques in model training
Addressing biases in diverse scenarios
Basic info
papers
computation and language
computer vision and pattern recognition
artificial intelligence
Advanced features
Insights
How do LVLMs, according to the benchmark, tend to generate responses?
What is the purpose of the VLind-Bench benchmark?
Which area of evaluation is least favored by existing LVLMs, except GPT-4, as per the study?
What does the benchmark use to distinguish between biases, understanding, and visual recognition?

VLind-Bench: Measuring Language Priors in Large Vision-Language Models

Kang-il Lee, Minbeom Kim, Minsung Kim, Dongryeol Lee, Hyukhun Koh, Kyomin Jung·June 13, 2024

Summary

VLind-Bench is a benchmark introduced to assess language priors in Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs), addressing their tendency to generate responses based on text patterns rather than image content. The benchmark evaluates four key areas: commonsense knowledge, visual perception, commonsense bias, and language prior. It reveals that existing LVLMs, except GPT-4, heavily rely on language priors, with smaller models showing more dependence. The study also finds that larger models like GPT-4o have reduced reliance and that RLHF techniques can help minimize this issue.VLind-Bench uses counterfactual images and factual tests to differentiate between biases, understanding, and visual recognition, providing a comprehensive framework for diagnosing and improving LVLMs. The benchmark dataset, available for research, includes various image styles and is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.
Mind map
Comparison between different model sizes
Analysis of model responses to counterfactuals
Accuracy scores for each area
Changes in model behavior post-RLHF
Effectiveness of reinforcement learning for improving visual understanding
Evidence of reduced language prior bias
Comparison with other LVLMs
Language prior: Quantifying the influence of language cues
Commonsense bias: Identifying reliance on text patterns
Visual perception: Model's ability to recognize objects and scenes
Commonsense knowledge: Assessing factual correctness
Evaluation Metrics
Diverse image styles and scenarios
Factual and counterfactual test sets
Counterfactual image generation
To assess the impact of RLHF techniques
To identify strengths and weaknesses of existing models
To investigate language priors in LVLMs
Importance of evaluating visual understanding in these models
Emergence of LVLMs and their reliance on text patterns
Addressing biases in diverse scenarios
Integration of RLHF techniques in model training
Potential for combined vision-language models
Use cases and limitations discussed
Benchmark dataset: CC BY-SA 4.0 license
Importance of addressing language priors for real-world applications
Recommendations for future research and model improvements
Summary of findings and implications for LVLM development
RLHF Impact
GPT-4 Performance
Model Performance
Data Preprocessing
Data Collection
Objective
Background
Future Directions
Availability
Conclusion
Results and Analysis
Methodology
Introduction
Outline

#VLind-Bench: A Benchmark for Assessing Language Priors in Large Vision-Language Models

Introduction
Background
Emergence of LVLMs and their reliance on text patterns
Importance of evaluating visual understanding in these models
Objective
To investigate language priors in LVLMs
To identify strengths and weaknesses of existing models
To assess the impact of RLHF techniques
Methodology
Data Collection
Counterfactual image generation
Factual and counterfactual test sets
Diverse image styles and scenarios
Data Preprocessing
Image and text data formatting
Annotation and labeling of test cases
Separation into evaluation areas (commonsense knowledge, visual perception, bias, language prior)
Evaluation Metrics
Accuracy scores for each area
Analysis of model responses to counterfactuals
Comparison between different model sizes
Results and Analysis
Model Performance
Commonsense knowledge: Assessing factual correctness
Visual perception: Model's ability to recognize objects and scenes
Commonsense bias: Identifying reliance on text patterns
Language prior: Quantifying the influence of language cues
GPT-4 Performance
Comparison with other LVLMs
Evidence of reduced language prior bias
RLHF Impact
Effectiveness of reinforcement learning for improving visual understanding
Changes in model behavior post-RLHF
Conclusion
Summary of findings and implications for LVLM development
Recommendations for future research and model improvements
Importance of addressing language priors for real-world applications
Availability
Benchmark dataset: CC BY-SA 4.0 license
Use cases and limitations discussed
Future Directions
Potential for combined vision-language models
Integration of RLHF techniques in model training
Addressing biases in diverse scenarios
Key findings
3

Paper digest

What problem does the paper attempt to solve? Is this a new problem?

The paper aims to address the issue of language prior in Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs). This problem refers to the tendency of models to generate responses based solely on textual patterns, disregarding image information, which can lead to biases and hallucinations . While the problem of language prior has been recognized in the Visual Question Answering (VQA) community, the paper focuses on accurately measuring this issue in LVLMs, which has not been extensively explored before .


What scientific hypothesis does this paper seek to validate?

This paper aims to validate the scientific hypothesis related to measuring language priors in large vision-language models . The study focuses on evaluating the language priors, commonsense knowledge, and commonsense bias in these models through various tests and benchmarks . The goal is to assess the models' capabilities in understanding and responding to counterfactual and multimodal contexts, distinguishing between common sense knowledge and language priors .


What new ideas, methods, or models does the paper propose? What are the characteristics and advantages compared to previous methods?

The paper proposes several new ideas, methods, and models in the field of large vision-language models:

  • Empowering large language models with multimodality: The paper introduces the concept of empowering large language models with multimodality, focusing on enhancing the trustworthiness of these models through behavior alignment and fine-grained correctional human feedback .
  • Disentangling parametric and contextual knowledge: The paper presents the DisentQA model, which aims to disentangle parametric and contextual knowledge through counterfactual question answering .
  • Aligning multimodal language models: The paper introduces the RLAIF-V model, which focuses on aligning multimodal language models through open-source AI feedback to enhance trustworthiness .
  • Dataset for open-domain question answering under counterfactual presuppositions: The paper introduces the IfQA dataset, designed for open-domain question answering under counterfactual presuppositions .
  • Evaluation of pre-trained vision-language models: The paper discusses the ROME framework, which evaluates pre-trained vision-language models on reasoning beyond visual common sense .
  • Analyzing and mitigating object hallucination: The paper addresses the issue of object hallucination in large vision-language models and proposes methods to analyze and mitigate this phenomenon .
  • Enhancing vision-language understanding with advanced large language models: The paper introduces the MiniGPT-4 model, which aims to enhance vision-language understanding using advanced large language models .

These proposals and models contribute to advancing the capabilities and trustworthiness of large vision-language models through innovative approaches and methodologies . The paper introduces several novel characteristics and advantages compared to previous methods in the field of large vision-language models:

  • Behavior Alignment and Fine-Grained Correctional Human Feedback: The paper proposes empowering large language models with multimodality through behavior alignment and fine-grained correctional human feedback, aiming to enhance trustworthiness .
  • Disentangling Parametric and Contextual Knowledge: The DisentQA model presented in the paper focuses on disentangling parametric and contextual knowledge through counterfactual question answering, offering a unique approach to understanding language priors .
  • RLHF-V Methodologies: Models trained using RLHF-V methodologies, such as OmniLMM and MiniCPM, demonstrate superior performance by mitigating multimodal hallucination and reducing reliance on language priors .
  • Impact of Backbone LLMs: The paper evaluates the influence of backbone LLMs on LVLM performance, indicating that the absolute scale of the backbone LLMs and the training methodology have a more substantial impact on LVLM performance than the performance of the backbone LLMs themselves .
  • Superiority of LVLMs: In certain scenarios, LVLMs are shown to be superior to their original backbone LLMs on tasks encompassing the same content in both image and text formats, highlighting the effectiveness of LVLMs in specific contexts .

These characteristics and advantages underscore the innovative approaches and methodologies proposed in the paper, contributing to the advancement of large vision-language models in terms of trustworthiness, performance, and disentanglement of knowledge .


Do any related researches exist? Who are the noteworthy researchers on this topic in this field?What is the key to the solution mentioned in the paper?

Several related research papers exist in the field of large vision-language models. Noteworthy researchers in this area include T. Yu, Y. Yao, H. Zhang, T. He, Y. Han, G. Cui, J. Hu, Z. Liu, H.-T. Zheng, M. Sun, and T.-S. Chua , K. Zhou, E. Lai, W. B. A. Yeong, K. Mouratidis, and J. Jiang , and J. Zhou, X. Zhou, and T. Zhu . These researchers have contributed to various aspects of vision-language models, such as evaluating reasoning beyond visual common sense, object hallucination analysis, and disentangling parametric and contextual knowledge with counterfactual question answering.

The key to the solution mentioned in the paper involves aligning multimodal large language models through open-source AI feedback to enhance the trustworthiness of the models . This approach aims to improve the performance and reliability of large vision-language models by incorporating fine-grained correctional human feedback and behavior alignment strategies.


How were the experiments in the paper designed?

The experiments in the paper were designed to assess the performance of various large vision-language models (LVLMs) using different visual inputs and methodologies . The experiments aimed to evaluate the models' capabilities in tasks such as commonsense knowledge (CK) and commonsense bias (CB) without image inputs, ensuring reproducibility by conducting inferences using 4 NVIDIA RTX A6000 GPUs . The experiments also explored the impact of language priors on model performance, highlighting the reliance on language priors observed in most models, especially in open-source LVLMs compared to proprietary ones . Additionally, the experiments investigated the influence of backbone LVLMs on the performance of LVLMs, revealing that the scale and training methodology of the backbone LVLMs have a more significant impact on the final performance of LVLMs than the performance of the backbone LVLMs themselves .


What is the dataset used for quantitative evaluation? Is the code open source?

The dataset used for quantitative evaluation in the study is VLind-Bench . The code for evaluation is open source and can be accessed at the following GitHub repository: https://github.com/klee972/VLind-Bench .


Do the experiments and results in the paper provide good support for the scientific hypotheses that need to be verified? Please analyze.

The experiments and results presented in the paper provide substantial support for the scientific hypotheses that need to be verified. The study conducted a comprehensive evaluation of various large vision-language models (LVLMs) using the VLind-Bench dataset, focusing on aspects like commonsense knowledge, visual perception, and counterfactual reasoning . The experiments involved assessing the models' performance on different concepts such as climate, color, diet, folklore, habitat, history, landmark, location, size, time, and weight, revealing varying scores across these categories .

The analysis of the experimental results highlighted interesting findings, such as the models demonstrating lower scores in commonsense knowledge (SCK) but higher scores in visual perception (SVP), indicating a disparity in knowledge domains . Additionally, the comparison of LP and SLP scores revealed discrepancies in model performance, emphasizing the importance of pipelined evaluation for gaining insights beyond task-level assessments . These observations align with previous research and contribute to a deeper understanding of LVLM capabilities .

Moreover, the experiments conducted using different visual inputs, including plain white images and rendered text prompts, provided valuable insights into the models' responses and performance variations based on the type of visual input . By systematically evaluating the models across multiple dimensions and scenarios, the study effectively tested the hypotheses related to the models' language priors and multimodal capabilities . The detailed analysis of the experimental outcomes offers robust evidence supporting the scientific inquiries addressed in the research .


What are the contributions of this paper?

The paper makes several contributions:

  • It introduces the DisentQA framework, which aims to disentangle parametric and contextual knowledge through counterfactual question answering .
  • The paper provides insights into the performance of various large vision-language models (LVLMs) on different concepts such as climate, color, diet, folklore, habitat, history, landmark, location, size, time, and weight .
  • It highlights the deficiencies in commonsense knowledge in LVLMs, as indicated by low scores in commonsense knowledge (SCK) but relatively high scores in visual perception (SVP) .
  • The study reveals a lack of correlation between LP and SLP scores in certain models, indicating that pipelined evaluation offers additional information beyond task-level evaluation alone .
  • Additionally, the paper discusses the experimental results on VLind-Bench using various visual inputs like plain white images and rendered text prompts, showcasing the performance of models like GPT-4o, LLaVA-NEXT 72B, and OmniLMM 12B under different visual input conditions .

What work can be continued in depth?

To delve deeper into the field of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs), further research can be conducted in the following areas:

  • Exploring Counterfactual Contexts: Research can focus on developing benchmarks that utilize counterfactual contexts to assess the robustness and generalization capabilities of LVLMs . These benchmarks can help evaluate how well models incorporate augmented information when answering questions or solving tasks conditioned on counterfactual contexts .
  • Addressing Bias and Hallucination Issues: Investigating methods to mitigate bias and hallucination problems inherent in LVLMs is crucial for enhancing the reliability and accuracy of these models . By developing techniques to reduce reliance on language priors and commonsense biases, the performance of LVLMs can be improved .
  • Enhancing Multimodal Capabilities: Further advancements can be made in empowering LVLMs with multimodality to enable them to better understand and process information from different modalities such as text and images . This can lead to more effective vision-language learning and reasoning capabilities in LVLMs.
  • Evaluation and Analysis: Continued evaluation and analysis of LVLMs, particularly focusing on aspects like reasoning beyond visual common sense, object hallucination, and reasoning capabilities through counterfactual tasks, can provide valuable insights into the strengths and limitations of these models .
  • Model Trustworthiness: Research efforts can be directed towards enhancing the trustworthiness of LVLMs by aligning models through open-source AI feedback, fine-grained correctional human feedback, and behavior alignment to ensure reliable model performance .
  • Dataset Development: Creating specialized datasets for open-domain question answering under counterfactual presuppositions can further facilitate research in LVLMs and advance the capabilities of these models .

By focusing on these areas, researchers can contribute to the advancement and refinement of Large Vision-Language Models, paving the way for more sophisticated and reliable multimodal AI systems.

Scan the QR code to ask more questions about the paper
© 2025 Powerdrill. All rights reserved.