Updating CLIP to Prefer Descriptions Over Captions

Amir Zur, Elisa Kreiss, Karel D'Oosterlinck, Christopher Potts, Atticus Geiger·June 12, 2024

Summary

This paper addresses the limitations of the CLIPScore by fine-tuning the CLIP model using the Concadia dataset to differentiate between descriptions for accessibility and captions. The authors employ various methods, including LoRA and IIT-DAS, to improve the model's performance, stability, and interpretability. LoRA is found to be more effective, while IIT-DAS enhances interpretability. The study shows that the updated model correlates better with blind and low-vision judgments, enhances alt-text evaluation, and maintains transfer capabilities. It evaluates different fine-tuning strategies, with IIT-DAS achieving the best results on transfer tasks while preserving accuracy. The research also explores the use of Integrated Gradients to analyze the model's distinction between descriptions and captions, highlighting their distinct roles in accessibility. The study contributes to making image models more accessible and interpretable, while suggesting future directions for broader application and dataset exploration.

Key findings

1

Paper digest

What problem does the paper attempt to solve? Is this a new problem?

The paper aims to address the issue of distinguishing between captions and descriptions in image-text similarity metrics, specifically focusing on preferring descriptions over captions for accessibility purposes . This problem is not entirely new, as existing metrics have struggled to differentiate between the distinct purposes of captions and descriptions, hindering progress towards genuine accessibility improvements . The paper introduces an approach to update the CLIP model with the Concadia dataset to assign higher scores to descriptions than captions, enhancing accessibility and interpretability .


What scientific hypothesis does this paper seek to validate?

This paper seeks to validate the scientific hypothesis that updating the CLIP model with the Concadia dataset can teach the model to prefer descriptions over captions by assigning higher scores to descriptions than captions for images, especially for accessibility purposes . The hypothesis aims to address the challenge of distinguishing between captions that complement images and descriptions that replace images entirely, particularly for blind and low-vision individuals . The study focuses on fine-tuning CLIP to produce more interpretable models that correlate with the judgments of blind and low-vision users while maintaining transfer capabilities .


What new ideas, methods, or models does the paper propose? What are the characteristics and advantages compared to previous methods?

The paper proposes several new ideas, methods, and models to update the CLIP model to prefer descriptions over captions using the Concadia dataset:

  • Contrastive Loss Objective: The paper introduces a contrastive loss objective to update CLIP, aiming to produce a higher score for descriptions than captions for images in Concadia .
  • Interchange Intervention Training (IIT) with Distributed Alignment Search (DAS): The paper combines IIT with DAS to localize the description-caption concept to an activation vector, enhancing interpretability and stability in the fine-tuning process .
  • LoRA (Low-Rank Adaptation): The study finds that LoRA is superior to standard fine-tuning in raising the CLIP-Score for descriptions over captions while maintaining CLIP's original capabilities .
  • Mediated Integrated Gradients: The paper uses mediated integrated gradients to characterize how the description-caption distinction is computed in the fine-tuned models, demonstrating the interpretability achieved through the IIT-DAS objective .
  • Transfer Evaluations: The fine-tuned CLIP models are evaluated on tasks like CIFAR-100, Food101, and ImageNet to assess their performance in zero-shot image classification, showing improvements in transfer scores and accuracy on the Concadia test set .
  • Correlation Analysis: The study reports correlations between fine-tuned CLIP scores and human evaluations from blind and sighted individuals, assessing aspects like overall value, imaginability, relevance, and irrelevance of descriptions as alt-text descriptions of images . The updated CLIP model proposed in the paper introduces several key characteristics and advantages compared to previous methods:
  • Contrastive Loss Objective: The paper utilizes a contrastive loss objective to update CLIP, aiming to assign higher scores to descriptions over captions in the Concadia dataset, enhancing the model's ability to distinguish between the two text types .
  • Interchange Intervention Training (IIT) with Distributed Alignment Search (DAS): By combining IIT with DAS, the updated CLIP model localizes the description-caption concept to an activation vector, leading to a more stable fine-tuning process and a more interpretable model .
  • LoRA (Low-Rank Adaptation): The study finds that LoRA is more effective than standard fine-tuning in increasing the CLIP-Score for descriptions compared to captions while maintaining CLIP's original capabilities, showcasing an improvement in performance and interpretability .
  • Mediated Integrated Gradients: The paper employs mediated integrated gradients to characterize how the description-caption distinction is computed in the fine-tuned models, enhancing interpretability and shedding light on the model's decision-making process .
  • Transfer Evaluations: The fine-tuned CLIP models are evaluated on various tasks like CIFAR-100, Food101, and ImageNet, demonstrating improved transfer scores and accuracy on the Concadia test set, showcasing the model's enhanced performance and adaptability .
  • Correlation Analysis: The study reports strong correlations between fine-tuned CLIP scores and human evaluations from blind and sighted individuals, assessing aspects like overall value, imaginability, relevance, and irrelevance of descriptions as alt-text descriptions of images, highlighting the model's alignment with human judgments and its effectiveness in generating accessible descriptions .

Do any related researches exist? Who are the noteworthy researchers on this topic in this field?What is the key to the solution mentioned in the paper?

Several related research studies have been conducted in the field of image descriptions and captions. Noteworthy researchers in this area include Elisa Kreiss, Christopher Potts, Atticus Geiger, Amir Zur, and Karel D’Oosterlinck . The key solution mentioned in the paper involves updating the CLIP model to prefer descriptions over captions by fine-tuning the model with the Concadia dataset and using a loss objective derived from work on causal interpretability. This update aims to assign higher scores to descriptions than captions, focusing on making images more accessible for blind and low-vision individuals .


How were the experiments in the paper designed?

The experiments in the paper were designed with a focus on evaluating the performance of fine-tuned CLIP models on various tasks and objectives. The experiments involved:

  • Fine-tuning CLIP on the Concadia dataset for the behavioral objective and the IIT-DAS objective, as well as LoRA fine-tuning .
  • Evaluating the fine-tuned CLIP models on transfer tasks such as CIFAR-100, Food101, and ImageNet to assess their performance in zero-shot image classification tasks .
  • Conducting transfer evaluations to measure the model's accuracy on the Concadia test set and its transfer score on different tasks .
  • Correlating the fine-tuned CLIP models' performance with human evaluations from BLV individuals and sighted individuals with and without access to the image .
  • Implementing a joint objective that minimizes both the behavioral and IIT-DAS objectives to strike a balance between Concadia accuracy and transfer capabilities .
  • Utilizing metrics such as recovery percentage, transfer score, and accuracy-transfer trade-off score to assess the model's performance on transfer tasks .
  • Performing hyperparameter searches for fine-tuning CLIP models based on different objectives and objectives, such as the behavioral objective, IIT-DAS objective, and LoRA fine-tuning .
  • Analyzing the correlation between CLIPScore metric and human evaluations to understand the model's suitability for alt-text evaluation .

What is the dataset used for quantitative evaluation? Is the code open source?

The dataset used for quantitative evaluation in the study is the Concadia dataset . The code used in the study is open source and available at the Hugging Face repository .


Do the experiments and results in the paper provide good support for the scientific hypotheses that need to be verified? Please analyze.

The experiments and results presented in the paper provide strong support for the scientific hypotheses that needed verification. The study focused on updating the CLIP model to prioritize descriptions over captions for images, particularly for accessibility purposes . The experiments involved fine-tuning CLIP with different objectives, such as LoRA and IIT-DAS, to enhance the model's ability to distinguish between descriptions and captions . The results demonstrated that the LoRA objective was superior to standard fine-tuning in increasing the CLIPScore for descriptions compared to captions while maintaining the original capabilities of CLIP . Additionally, the IIT-DAS objective led to a more stable fine-tuning process and produced a more interpretable model, showcasing the effectiveness of this approach .

Moreover, the study evaluated the fine-tuned CLIP models on various transfer tasks, including CIFAR-100, Food101, and ImageNet, to assess their generalization capabilities . The results showed that fine-tuning on Concadia improved the model's performance on these transfer tasks, indicating the effectiveness of the proposed approach . Furthermore, the correlation between the BLV user judgments and model similarity scores affirmed the value of the update in aligning with user preferences . Overall, the experiments and results provided robust evidence supporting the hypotheses and demonstrating the efficacy of the proposed methodology in enhancing the CLIP model for prioritizing descriptions over captions for images, especially in the context of accessibility .


What are the contributions of this paper?

The paper "Updating CLIP to Prefer Descriptions Over Captions" makes several key contributions:

  • It introduces an update to the CLIP model that prioritizes descriptions over captions by using a contrastive loss objective to assign higher scores to descriptions than captions for images in the Concadia dataset .
  • The paper proposes an extension of the contrastive loss objective that aims to enhance the distinction between descriptions and captions, creating more interpretable models by approximating counterfactual scenarios and utilizing ideas from causal interpretability research, such as interchange intervention training (IIT) and distributed alignment search (DAS) .
  • Through experiments, the paper demonstrates that fine-tuning CLIP with the proposed objectives, particularly LoRA, leads to better performance in distinguishing descriptions from captions while maintaining CLIP's original capabilities .
  • The study shows that the updated CLIP model correlates more strongly with the preferences of blind and low-vision (BLV) users, indicating the effectiveness of the update in aligning with user judgments .
  • Additionally, the paper highlights that the IIT-DAS objective results in a more stable fine-tuning process and produces a more interpretable model, as evidenced by the use of mediated integrated gradients to characterize how the description-caption distinction is computed in the fine-tuned models .

What work can be continued in depth?

Further research can delve deeper into strategies to optimally combine the behavioral and IIT-DAS objectives for updating a pretrained model like CLIP with the Concadia dataset . Additionally, exploring the incorporation of textual context into referenceless evaluation metrics for text-image models can be a valuable avenue for future work, enhancing the assessment of multimodal settings such as image synthesis, description generation, and zero-shot image classification .

Tables

2

Introduction
Background
Limitations of CLIPScore in accessibility evaluation
Importance of accessible image descriptions and captions
Objective
To enhance CLIP model for accessibility and caption differentiation
Improve model performance, stability, and interpretability
Method
Data Collection
Use of Concadia dataset for fine-tuning
Dataset characteristics and relevance to accessibility and captions
Data Preprocessing
Preprocessing techniques for CLIP model adaptation
Cleaning and formatting of accessibility and caption data
Model Fine-Tuning
LoRA Implementation
Overview of Lattice Regularization (LoRA) method
Performance improvement with LoRA on accessibility task
IIT-DAS Integration
Integration of Indian Institute of Technology Delhi's (IIT-DAS) dataset
Impact on model stability and interpretability
Fine-Tuning Strategies
Comparative analysis of different strategies
IIT-DAS performance on transfer tasks and accuracy preservation
Evaluation and Validation
Correlation with blind and low-vision judgments
Alt-text evaluation enhancement
Transfer capabilities assessment
Model Interpretability
Integrated Gradients for analyzing distinction
Insights into the roles of descriptions and captions in accessibility
Results and Discussion
Improved model performance metrics
Case studies and examples of enhanced accessibility
Limitations and future directions
Conclusion
Contributions to accessible image models
Implications for broader application
Recommendations for future research and dataset expansion
Basic info
papers
computer vision and pattern recognition
computation and language
artificial intelligence
Advanced features
Insights
What dataset does the paper fine-tune the CLIP model on to address the limitations of CLIPScore?
What technique does the research employ to analyze the model's distinction between descriptions and captions?
How does the updated model benefit alt-text evaluation and blind/low-vision judgments?
Which method is found to be more effective for improving the model's performance in the study?

Updating CLIP to Prefer Descriptions Over Captions

Amir Zur, Elisa Kreiss, Karel D'Oosterlinck, Christopher Potts, Atticus Geiger·June 12, 2024

Summary

This paper addresses the limitations of the CLIPScore by fine-tuning the CLIP model using the Concadia dataset to differentiate between descriptions for accessibility and captions. The authors employ various methods, including LoRA and IIT-DAS, to improve the model's performance, stability, and interpretability. LoRA is found to be more effective, while IIT-DAS enhances interpretability. The study shows that the updated model correlates better with blind and low-vision judgments, enhances alt-text evaluation, and maintains transfer capabilities. It evaluates different fine-tuning strategies, with IIT-DAS achieving the best results on transfer tasks while preserving accuracy. The research also explores the use of Integrated Gradients to analyze the model's distinction between descriptions and captions, highlighting their distinct roles in accessibility. The study contributes to making image models more accessible and interpretable, while suggesting future directions for broader application and dataset exploration.
Mind map
IIT-DAS performance on transfer tasks and accuracy preservation
Comparative analysis of different strategies
Impact on model stability and interpretability
Integration of Indian Institute of Technology Delhi's (IIT-DAS) dataset
Performance improvement with LoRA on accessibility task
Overview of Lattice Regularization (LoRA) method
Insights into the roles of descriptions and captions in accessibility
Integrated Gradients for analyzing distinction
Fine-Tuning Strategies
IIT-DAS Integration
LoRA Implementation
Model Interpretability
Model Fine-Tuning
Dataset characteristics and relevance to accessibility and captions
Use of Concadia dataset for fine-tuning
Improve model performance, stability, and interpretability
To enhance CLIP model for accessibility and caption differentiation
Importance of accessible image descriptions and captions
Limitations of CLIPScore in accessibility evaluation
Recommendations for future research and dataset expansion
Implications for broader application
Contributions to accessible image models
Limitations and future directions
Case studies and examples of enhanced accessibility
Improved model performance metrics
Evaluation and Validation
Data Preprocessing
Data Collection
Objective
Background
Conclusion
Results and Discussion
Method
Introduction
Outline
Introduction
Background
Limitations of CLIPScore in accessibility evaluation
Importance of accessible image descriptions and captions
Objective
To enhance CLIP model for accessibility and caption differentiation
Improve model performance, stability, and interpretability
Method
Data Collection
Use of Concadia dataset for fine-tuning
Dataset characteristics and relevance to accessibility and captions
Data Preprocessing
Preprocessing techniques for CLIP model adaptation
Cleaning and formatting of accessibility and caption data
Model Fine-Tuning
LoRA Implementation
Overview of Lattice Regularization (LoRA) method
Performance improvement with LoRA on accessibility task
IIT-DAS Integration
Integration of Indian Institute of Technology Delhi's (IIT-DAS) dataset
Impact on model stability and interpretability
Fine-Tuning Strategies
Comparative analysis of different strategies
IIT-DAS performance on transfer tasks and accuracy preservation
Evaluation and Validation
Correlation with blind and low-vision judgments
Alt-text evaluation enhancement
Transfer capabilities assessment
Model Interpretability
Integrated Gradients for analyzing distinction
Insights into the roles of descriptions and captions in accessibility
Results and Discussion
Improved model performance metrics
Case studies and examples of enhanced accessibility
Limitations and future directions
Conclusion
Contributions to accessible image models
Implications for broader application
Recommendations for future research and dataset expansion
Key findings
1

Paper digest

What problem does the paper attempt to solve? Is this a new problem?

The paper aims to address the issue of distinguishing between captions and descriptions in image-text similarity metrics, specifically focusing on preferring descriptions over captions for accessibility purposes . This problem is not entirely new, as existing metrics have struggled to differentiate between the distinct purposes of captions and descriptions, hindering progress towards genuine accessibility improvements . The paper introduces an approach to update the CLIP model with the Concadia dataset to assign higher scores to descriptions than captions, enhancing accessibility and interpretability .


What scientific hypothesis does this paper seek to validate?

This paper seeks to validate the scientific hypothesis that updating the CLIP model with the Concadia dataset can teach the model to prefer descriptions over captions by assigning higher scores to descriptions than captions for images, especially for accessibility purposes . The hypothesis aims to address the challenge of distinguishing between captions that complement images and descriptions that replace images entirely, particularly for blind and low-vision individuals . The study focuses on fine-tuning CLIP to produce more interpretable models that correlate with the judgments of blind and low-vision users while maintaining transfer capabilities .


What new ideas, methods, or models does the paper propose? What are the characteristics and advantages compared to previous methods?

The paper proposes several new ideas, methods, and models to update the CLIP model to prefer descriptions over captions using the Concadia dataset:

  • Contrastive Loss Objective: The paper introduces a contrastive loss objective to update CLIP, aiming to produce a higher score for descriptions than captions for images in Concadia .
  • Interchange Intervention Training (IIT) with Distributed Alignment Search (DAS): The paper combines IIT with DAS to localize the description-caption concept to an activation vector, enhancing interpretability and stability in the fine-tuning process .
  • LoRA (Low-Rank Adaptation): The study finds that LoRA is superior to standard fine-tuning in raising the CLIP-Score for descriptions over captions while maintaining CLIP's original capabilities .
  • Mediated Integrated Gradients: The paper uses mediated integrated gradients to characterize how the description-caption distinction is computed in the fine-tuned models, demonstrating the interpretability achieved through the IIT-DAS objective .
  • Transfer Evaluations: The fine-tuned CLIP models are evaluated on tasks like CIFAR-100, Food101, and ImageNet to assess their performance in zero-shot image classification, showing improvements in transfer scores and accuracy on the Concadia test set .
  • Correlation Analysis: The study reports correlations between fine-tuned CLIP scores and human evaluations from blind and sighted individuals, assessing aspects like overall value, imaginability, relevance, and irrelevance of descriptions as alt-text descriptions of images . The updated CLIP model proposed in the paper introduces several key characteristics and advantages compared to previous methods:
  • Contrastive Loss Objective: The paper utilizes a contrastive loss objective to update CLIP, aiming to assign higher scores to descriptions over captions in the Concadia dataset, enhancing the model's ability to distinguish between the two text types .
  • Interchange Intervention Training (IIT) with Distributed Alignment Search (DAS): By combining IIT with DAS, the updated CLIP model localizes the description-caption concept to an activation vector, leading to a more stable fine-tuning process and a more interpretable model .
  • LoRA (Low-Rank Adaptation): The study finds that LoRA is more effective than standard fine-tuning in increasing the CLIP-Score for descriptions compared to captions while maintaining CLIP's original capabilities, showcasing an improvement in performance and interpretability .
  • Mediated Integrated Gradients: The paper employs mediated integrated gradients to characterize how the description-caption distinction is computed in the fine-tuned models, enhancing interpretability and shedding light on the model's decision-making process .
  • Transfer Evaluations: The fine-tuned CLIP models are evaluated on various tasks like CIFAR-100, Food101, and ImageNet, demonstrating improved transfer scores and accuracy on the Concadia test set, showcasing the model's enhanced performance and adaptability .
  • Correlation Analysis: The study reports strong correlations between fine-tuned CLIP scores and human evaluations from blind and sighted individuals, assessing aspects like overall value, imaginability, relevance, and irrelevance of descriptions as alt-text descriptions of images, highlighting the model's alignment with human judgments and its effectiveness in generating accessible descriptions .

Do any related researches exist? Who are the noteworthy researchers on this topic in this field?What is the key to the solution mentioned in the paper?

Several related research studies have been conducted in the field of image descriptions and captions. Noteworthy researchers in this area include Elisa Kreiss, Christopher Potts, Atticus Geiger, Amir Zur, and Karel D’Oosterlinck . The key solution mentioned in the paper involves updating the CLIP model to prefer descriptions over captions by fine-tuning the model with the Concadia dataset and using a loss objective derived from work on causal interpretability. This update aims to assign higher scores to descriptions than captions, focusing on making images more accessible for blind and low-vision individuals .


How were the experiments in the paper designed?

The experiments in the paper were designed with a focus on evaluating the performance of fine-tuned CLIP models on various tasks and objectives. The experiments involved:

  • Fine-tuning CLIP on the Concadia dataset for the behavioral objective and the IIT-DAS objective, as well as LoRA fine-tuning .
  • Evaluating the fine-tuned CLIP models on transfer tasks such as CIFAR-100, Food101, and ImageNet to assess their performance in zero-shot image classification tasks .
  • Conducting transfer evaluations to measure the model's accuracy on the Concadia test set and its transfer score on different tasks .
  • Correlating the fine-tuned CLIP models' performance with human evaluations from BLV individuals and sighted individuals with and without access to the image .
  • Implementing a joint objective that minimizes both the behavioral and IIT-DAS objectives to strike a balance between Concadia accuracy and transfer capabilities .
  • Utilizing metrics such as recovery percentage, transfer score, and accuracy-transfer trade-off score to assess the model's performance on transfer tasks .
  • Performing hyperparameter searches for fine-tuning CLIP models based on different objectives and objectives, such as the behavioral objective, IIT-DAS objective, and LoRA fine-tuning .
  • Analyzing the correlation between CLIPScore metric and human evaluations to understand the model's suitability for alt-text evaluation .

What is the dataset used for quantitative evaluation? Is the code open source?

The dataset used for quantitative evaluation in the study is the Concadia dataset . The code used in the study is open source and available at the Hugging Face repository .


Do the experiments and results in the paper provide good support for the scientific hypotheses that need to be verified? Please analyze.

The experiments and results presented in the paper provide strong support for the scientific hypotheses that needed verification. The study focused on updating the CLIP model to prioritize descriptions over captions for images, particularly for accessibility purposes . The experiments involved fine-tuning CLIP with different objectives, such as LoRA and IIT-DAS, to enhance the model's ability to distinguish between descriptions and captions . The results demonstrated that the LoRA objective was superior to standard fine-tuning in increasing the CLIPScore for descriptions compared to captions while maintaining the original capabilities of CLIP . Additionally, the IIT-DAS objective led to a more stable fine-tuning process and produced a more interpretable model, showcasing the effectiveness of this approach .

Moreover, the study evaluated the fine-tuned CLIP models on various transfer tasks, including CIFAR-100, Food101, and ImageNet, to assess their generalization capabilities . The results showed that fine-tuning on Concadia improved the model's performance on these transfer tasks, indicating the effectiveness of the proposed approach . Furthermore, the correlation between the BLV user judgments and model similarity scores affirmed the value of the update in aligning with user preferences . Overall, the experiments and results provided robust evidence supporting the hypotheses and demonstrating the efficacy of the proposed methodology in enhancing the CLIP model for prioritizing descriptions over captions for images, especially in the context of accessibility .


What are the contributions of this paper?

The paper "Updating CLIP to Prefer Descriptions Over Captions" makes several key contributions:

  • It introduces an update to the CLIP model that prioritizes descriptions over captions by using a contrastive loss objective to assign higher scores to descriptions than captions for images in the Concadia dataset .
  • The paper proposes an extension of the contrastive loss objective that aims to enhance the distinction between descriptions and captions, creating more interpretable models by approximating counterfactual scenarios and utilizing ideas from causal interpretability research, such as interchange intervention training (IIT) and distributed alignment search (DAS) .
  • Through experiments, the paper demonstrates that fine-tuning CLIP with the proposed objectives, particularly LoRA, leads to better performance in distinguishing descriptions from captions while maintaining CLIP's original capabilities .
  • The study shows that the updated CLIP model correlates more strongly with the preferences of blind and low-vision (BLV) users, indicating the effectiveness of the update in aligning with user judgments .
  • Additionally, the paper highlights that the IIT-DAS objective results in a more stable fine-tuning process and produces a more interpretable model, as evidenced by the use of mediated integrated gradients to characterize how the description-caption distinction is computed in the fine-tuned models .

What work can be continued in depth?

Further research can delve deeper into strategies to optimally combine the behavioral and IIT-DAS objectives for updating a pretrained model like CLIP with the Concadia dataset . Additionally, exploring the incorporation of textual context into referenceless evaluation metrics for text-image models can be a valuable avenue for future work, enhancing the assessment of multimodal settings such as image synthesis, description generation, and zero-shot image classification .

Tables
2
Scan the QR code to ask more questions about the paper
© 2025 Powerdrill. All rights reserved.