SciDMT: A Large-Scale Corpus for Detecting Scientific Mentions

Huitong Pan, Qi Zhang, Cornelia Caragea, Eduard Dragut, Longin Jan Latecki·June 20, 2024

Summary

SciDMT is a groundbreaking large-scale corpus for scientific mention detection, containing 48,049 annotated articles with over 1.8 million weak annotations of datasets, methods, and tasks. It expands upon existing resources by providing document-level annotations, distant supervision from Papers with Code, and a manually annotated evaluation set. The corpus is designed to enhance models for information retrieval and scientific knowledge accessibility, with experiments using advanced models like SciBERT and GPT-3.5. It outperforms previous works in scope and annotation quality, addressing challenges specific to scientific entity mention detection. The study evaluates NER models, demonstrating the utility of the corpus and the need for further refinement, while also highlighting the limitations of distant supervision. SciDMT serves as a valuable resource for the NLP community to improve scientific information extraction and advance research in the field.

Key findings

5

Paper digest

What problem does the paper attempt to solve? Is this a new problem?

The paper aims to address the task of scientific entity mention detection (SEMD) by focusing on detecting mentions of scientific entities such as datasets, methods, and tasks within scientific documents . This task involves establishing baseline performance on a large-scale corpus called SciDMT, gaining insights into the difficulty of SEMD, and evaluating the effectiveness of using SciDMT for training . While the task of SEMD itself is not new, the paper contributes to this field by introducing SciDMT, a comprehensive corpus annotated with scientific entity mentions, offering a valuable resource for advancing SEMD research .


What scientific hypothesis does this paper seek to validate?

This paper seeks to validate the efficacy of the SciDMT corpus through experiments, demonstrating its superiority in training SEMD models compared to existing corpora. Additionally, the evaluation of NER methods like SciBERT and GPT-3.5 on SciDMT showcases the intricate challenges and prospects of SEMD .


What new ideas, methods, or models does the paper propose? What are the characteristics and advantages compared to previous methods?

The paper "SciDMT: A Large-Scale Corpus for Detecting Scientific Mentions" introduces several innovative ideas, methods, and models in the field of scientific entity mention detection (SEMD) .

  1. Creation of SciDMT Corpus: The paper presents the creation of the SciDMT corpus, which features comprehensive entity annotations spanning datasets, methods, and tasks. This corpus contains weakly labeled instances for model training and manually annotated instances for evaluation, providing a valuable resource for advancing SEMD .

  2. Distant Supervision for Corpus Creation: The creation of SciDMT is facilitated by distant supervision, leveraging document-level annotations from the Papers with Code website. This approach results in a main corpus comprising a large volume of machine-learning articles annotated with in-text spans, marking the mentions of datasets, methods, and tasks .

  3. Enhanced Information Extraction: SciDMT goes beyond being just a corpus; it serves as a resource for enhancing information extraction. By annotating full articles and preserving the context of entity mentions, SciDMT aids in term disambiguation and enhances recognition accuracy. Each mention in SciDMT is linkable to Papers with Code, and the introduction of ontology-linking for tasks and datasets further enriches the corpus's utility .

  4. Experimental Setup and Baseline Models: The paper formulates the task of SEMD as a single-sentence tagging task and includes a diverse set of models as baselines in the evaluation, such as Conditional Random Fields (CRF), Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (BiLSTM), BERT, SciBERT, and GPT-3.5. The experiments focus on three categories of scientific entities: datasets, methods, and tasks .

  5. Evaluation of NER Methods: The paper evaluates Named Entity Recognition (NER) methods, including SciBERT and GPT-3.5, on the SciDMT corpus. This evaluation demonstrates the intricate challenges and prospects of SEMD, showcasing the superiority of SciDMT in training SEMD models compared to existing corpora . The SciDMT corpus introduces several key characteristics and advantages compared to previous methods in the field of scientific entity mention detection (SEMD) .

Characteristics:

  1. Comprehensive Entity Annotations: SciDMT is annotated at the document level, covering datasets, methods, and tasks, providing a holistic view of scientific mentions within articles .
  2. Linkable Mentions: Each mention in SciDMT is linkable to Papers with Code (PwC), enhancing the corpus's utility and facilitating information extraction .
  3. Ontology-Linking: SciDMT enriches the corpus by introducing ontology-linking for tasks and datasets, further enhancing the context and understanding of entity mentions .
  4. Scale and Diversity: The SciDMT corpus is the largest known corpus for scientific entity mention detection, offering a vast volume of weakly annotated mentions for model training and manually annotated instances for evaluation .

Advantages Compared to Previous Methods:

  1. Enhanced Information Extraction: By annotating full articles and preserving the context of entity mentions, SciDMT aids in term disambiguation and improves recognition accuracy, surpassing the limitations of previous corpora .
  2. Training Efficacy: SciDMT demonstrates superiority in training SEMD models compared to existing corpora, showcasing its effectiveness in developing competitive models for scientific entity mention detection .
  3. Resource Accessibility: The SciDMT corpus serves as a robust benchmark for the research community, encouraging the development of innovative models to advance the field of scientific information extraction .
  4. Volume and Quality: SciDMT's large-scale corpus, annotated through distant supervision, balances scale and accuracy, offering a valuable resource for training models and advancing SEMD .

In summary, SciDMT's unique characteristics, such as comprehensive annotations, linkable mentions, ontology-linking, scale, and training efficacy, position it as a significant advancement in the field of scientific entity mention detection, surpassing the limitations of previous methods and corpora .


Do any related researches exist? Who are the noteworthy researchers on this topic in this field?What is the key to the solution mentioned in the paper?

Several related researches exist in the field of scientific entity mention detection. Noteworthy researchers in this field include Eduard C. Dragut, Hong Wang, Clement T. Yu, A. Prasad Sistla, Weiyi Meng, Nikolas McNeal, Clay Washington, You Chen, Lang Li, Huan Sun, Yu Su, Omer Levy, Yoav Goldberg, Ido Dagan, Tomas Mikolov, Kai Chen, Greg S. Corrado, Jeffrey Dean, Mike Mintz, Steven Bills, Rion Snow, Daniel Jurafsky, Mark Neumann, Daniel King, Iz Beltagy, Waleed Ammar, Muhammad Abdul-Mageed, Lyle Ungar, Jumanah Alshehri, Marija Stanojevic, Zoran Obradovic, Sanjeev Arora, Yuanzhi Li, Yingyu Liang, Tengyu Ma, Andrej Risteski, Kyle Lo, Arman Cohan, Steven Bird, Ewan Klein, Edward Loper, Priyankar Bose, Sriram Srinivasan, William C. Slee-man, Jatinder Palta, Rishabh Kapoor, Pree-tam Ghosh, Mark Davies, Joseph L. Fleiss, Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, Kristina Toutanova, Jeffrey Pennington, Richard Socher, Christopher Manning, Andrew Schneider, Lihong He, Zhijia Chen, Arjun Mukherjee, Alisa Smirnova, Philippe Cudré-Mauroux, Pontus Stenetorp, Sampo Pyysalo, Goran Topić, Tomoko Ohta, Sophia Ananiadou, Jun’ichi Tsujii, Peng Su, Gang Li, Cathy Wu, K. Vijay-Shanker, Jie Tang, Jing Zhang, Limin Yao, Juanzi Li, Li Zhang, Zhong Su, Shanshan Zhang, Slobodan Vucetic, Yi Luan, Luheng He, Mari Ostendorf, Hannaneh Hajishirzi, Huitong Pan, Qi Zhang, Cornelia Caragea, Longin Jan Latecki, among others .

The key to the solution mentioned in the paper is the development of SciDMT, an enhanced and expanded corpus for scientific mention detection. This corpus contains annotated scientific documents for datasets, methods, and tasks, with a main corpus consisting of 48 thousand scientific articles and an evaluation set of 100 articles manually annotated for evaluation purposes. The scale and diversity of SciDMT are crucial for developing and refining models for tasks such as indexing scientific papers, enhancing information retrieval, and improving the accessibility of scientific knowledge. The paper demonstrates the utility of the corpus through experiments with advanced deep learning architectures like SciBERT and GPT-3.5, establishing performance baselines and highlighting unresolved challenges in scientific mention detection .


How were the experiments in the paper designed?

The experiments in the paper were designed to evaluate various Named Entity Recognition (NER) methods, including Conditional Random Fields (CRF), Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (BiLSTM), BERT, SciBERT, and GPT-3.5 . These methods were trained in 3 rounds using randomly shuffled training sets, with different features and initialization methods for BiLSTM . The models were evaluated on different datasets, and the performance was assessed based on F1 scores . Additionally, the study included the training of SciBERT using different training set sizes to analyze the impact of training scale on model performance . The experiments aimed to showcase the effectiveness of the SciDMT corpus in training SEMD models and evaluating NER methods .


What is the dataset used for quantitative evaluation? Is the code open source?

The dataset used for quantitative evaluation in the study is SciDMT-E* and SciREX-E* . The code used in the study is open source and can be accessed at the following GitHub repository: https://github.com/Coleridge-Initiative/rclc .


Do the experiments and results in the paper provide good support for the scientific hypotheses that need to be verified? Please analyze.

The experiments and results presented in the paper provide substantial support for the scientific hypotheses that need to be verified. The evaluation conducted on the manually annotated evaluation sets, SciDMT-E and SciREX-E, involved assessing the performance of various NER models, including BERT, SciBERT, BiLSTM, and GPT-3.5, on detecting scientific entities . The results indicated that BERT and SciBERT exhibited the highest overall performance, with similar performances on both evaluation sets, suggesting comparable dataset difficulty . Additionally, the study revealed that dataset mentions were generally easier to detect compared to method and task mentions, possibly due to the standardized nature of dataset names .

Moreover, the performance of the models on the unseen subset in SciDMT-E was unexpectedly higher than the overall average performance for BERT and SciBERT, potentially due to the exclusion of more challenging cases in the limited sample size . The findings also highlighted that GPT-3.5, even without fine-tuning, demonstrated knowledge about scientific entities, predicting general concept words and citations as scientific entities . However, GPT-3.5 faced challenges in isolating the correct entity from descriptions with multiple mentions and recognizing mentions with uncommon dash patterns .

Furthermore, the error analysis conducted based on the performance of the best model, SciBERT, identified common patterns among erroneous instances, such as long sequences with multiple mentions and difficulties in recognizing mentions with uncommon dash patterns . This detailed analysis provides valuable insights into the challenges and areas for improvement in detecting scientific entities, contributing to the verification of scientific hypotheses and enhancing the understanding of NER model performance in scientific text processing.


What are the contributions of this paper?

The paper "SciDMT: A Large-Scale Corpus for Detecting Scientific Mentions" makes several significant contributions to the field of scientific entity mention detection (SEMD) :

  • Creation of a Comprehensive Corpus: The paper introduces SciDMT, a corpus that includes annotated scientific documents for datasets, methods, and tasks. It consists of a main corpus with weakly annotated mentions and an evaluation set with manually annotated articles for evaluation purposes.
  • Utilization of Distant Supervision: The creation of SciDMT is facilitated by distant supervision, leveraging document-level annotations from the Papers with Code website. This approach allows for the annotation of 48,049 machine-learning articles with in-text spans, marking mentions of datasets, methods, and tasks.
  • Enhancement of Information Extraction: By annotating full articles and preserving the context of entity mentions, SciDMT aids in term disambiguation and enhances recognition accuracy. Each mention is linkable to Papers with Code, and the introduction of ontology-linking for tasks and datasets enriches the corpus's utility.
  • Advancement of Scientific Information Retrieval: SciDMT serves as a valuable resource for indexing scientific papers, enhancing information retrieval, and making scientific knowledge more accessible.
  • Encouragement of Model Development: The corpus's scale and diversity are instrumental in developing and refining models for tasks such as indexing scientific papers, enhancing information retrieval, and improving the accessibility of scientific knowledge. It encourages the development of innovative models to further the field of scientific information extraction.

What work can be continued in depth?

To further advance the field of scientific entity mention detection (SEMD), several areas of work can be continued in depth based on the information provided in the SciDMT corpus :

  • Expansion of Annotated Entities: Enhancing the corpus by broadening the spectrum of annotated entities can contribute to improving the recognition accuracy and coverage of scientific mentions .
  • Refinement of Weak Labels: Continuously refining weak labels within the corpus can lead to better training data quality and subsequently enhance the performance of SEMD models .
  • Increase Corpus Size: Augmenting the corpus size can provide more diverse and comprehensive data for training advanced scientific information extraction models, thereby improving the overall performance of SEMD .
  • Incorporation of Post-Processing Techniques: Implementing sophisticated post-processing techniques to cleanse distant supervision labels can help improve the quality and reliability of the training data, leading to more accurate SEMD models .
  • Addressing Challenging Instances: Focusing on addressing more challenging instances, such as unseen and ambiguous mentions, can further enhance the performance and robustness of scientific mention detection models .

Tables

1

Introduction
Background
Overview of scientific information extraction
Importance of scientific mention detection
Objective
Goal of the SciDMT corpus development
Aim to enhance information retrieval and knowledge accessibility
Method
Data Collection
Source: Papers with Code
Integration of Papers with Code for distant supervision
Size and article selection criteria
Manual Annotation
Manually annotated evaluation set
Annotation process and guidelines
Data Preprocessing
Article preprocessing techniques
Standardization of scientific entities (datasets, methods, tasks)
Handling weak annotations
Experiments and Evaluation
Model Implementation
Usage of SciBERT and GPT-3.5 for benchmarking
Model performance on the corpus
Evaluation Metrics
Comparison with previous works
Document-level and entity-level evaluation
Results and Analysis
Outperformance of SciDMT in scope and annotation quality
Limitations of distant supervision in the context of NER
Challenges and Future Directions
Identified limitations of the corpus
Opportunities for model refinement and improvement
Impact on the NLP community and research advancements
Conclusion
Summary of SciDMT's contributions to scientific information extraction
Importance as a resource for the NLP community
Future research directions in scientific mention detection
Basic info
papers
artificial intelligence
Advanced features
Insights
What is the primary purpose of SciDMT?
What is SciDMT?
How does SciDMT differ from existing resources in scientific mention detection?
How many articles and annotations does SciDMT contain?

SciDMT: A Large-Scale Corpus for Detecting Scientific Mentions

Huitong Pan, Qi Zhang, Cornelia Caragea, Eduard Dragut, Longin Jan Latecki·June 20, 2024

Summary

SciDMT is a groundbreaking large-scale corpus for scientific mention detection, containing 48,049 annotated articles with over 1.8 million weak annotations of datasets, methods, and tasks. It expands upon existing resources by providing document-level annotations, distant supervision from Papers with Code, and a manually annotated evaluation set. The corpus is designed to enhance models for information retrieval and scientific knowledge accessibility, with experiments using advanced models like SciBERT and GPT-3.5. It outperforms previous works in scope and annotation quality, addressing challenges specific to scientific entity mention detection. The study evaluates NER models, demonstrating the utility of the corpus and the need for further refinement, while also highlighting the limitations of distant supervision. SciDMT serves as a valuable resource for the NLP community to improve scientific information extraction and advance research in the field.
Mind map
Annotation process and guidelines
Manually annotated evaluation set
Size and article selection criteria
Integration of Papers with Code for distant supervision
Limitations of distant supervision in the context of NER
Outperformance of SciDMT in scope and annotation quality
Document-level and entity-level evaluation
Comparison with previous works
Model performance on the corpus
Usage of SciBERT and GPT-3.5 for benchmarking
Handling weak annotations
Standardization of scientific entities (datasets, methods, tasks)
Article preprocessing techniques
Manual Annotation
Source: Papers with Code
Aim to enhance information retrieval and knowledge accessibility
Goal of the SciDMT corpus development
Importance of scientific mention detection
Overview of scientific information extraction
Future research directions in scientific mention detection
Importance as a resource for the NLP community
Summary of SciDMT's contributions to scientific information extraction
Impact on the NLP community and research advancements
Opportunities for model refinement and improvement
Identified limitations of the corpus
Results and Analysis
Evaluation Metrics
Model Implementation
Data Preprocessing
Data Collection
Objective
Background
Conclusion
Challenges and Future Directions
Experiments and Evaluation
Method
Introduction
Outline
Introduction
Background
Overview of scientific information extraction
Importance of scientific mention detection
Objective
Goal of the SciDMT corpus development
Aim to enhance information retrieval and knowledge accessibility
Method
Data Collection
Source: Papers with Code
Integration of Papers with Code for distant supervision
Size and article selection criteria
Manual Annotation
Manually annotated evaluation set
Annotation process and guidelines
Data Preprocessing
Article preprocessing techniques
Standardization of scientific entities (datasets, methods, tasks)
Handling weak annotations
Experiments and Evaluation
Model Implementation
Usage of SciBERT and GPT-3.5 for benchmarking
Model performance on the corpus
Evaluation Metrics
Comparison with previous works
Document-level and entity-level evaluation
Results and Analysis
Outperformance of SciDMT in scope and annotation quality
Limitations of distant supervision in the context of NER
Challenges and Future Directions
Identified limitations of the corpus
Opportunities for model refinement and improvement
Impact on the NLP community and research advancements
Conclusion
Summary of SciDMT's contributions to scientific information extraction
Importance as a resource for the NLP community
Future research directions in scientific mention detection
Key findings
5

Paper digest

What problem does the paper attempt to solve? Is this a new problem?

The paper aims to address the task of scientific entity mention detection (SEMD) by focusing on detecting mentions of scientific entities such as datasets, methods, and tasks within scientific documents . This task involves establishing baseline performance on a large-scale corpus called SciDMT, gaining insights into the difficulty of SEMD, and evaluating the effectiveness of using SciDMT for training . While the task of SEMD itself is not new, the paper contributes to this field by introducing SciDMT, a comprehensive corpus annotated with scientific entity mentions, offering a valuable resource for advancing SEMD research .


What scientific hypothesis does this paper seek to validate?

This paper seeks to validate the efficacy of the SciDMT corpus through experiments, demonstrating its superiority in training SEMD models compared to existing corpora. Additionally, the evaluation of NER methods like SciBERT and GPT-3.5 on SciDMT showcases the intricate challenges and prospects of SEMD .


What new ideas, methods, or models does the paper propose? What are the characteristics and advantages compared to previous methods?

The paper "SciDMT: A Large-Scale Corpus for Detecting Scientific Mentions" introduces several innovative ideas, methods, and models in the field of scientific entity mention detection (SEMD) .

  1. Creation of SciDMT Corpus: The paper presents the creation of the SciDMT corpus, which features comprehensive entity annotations spanning datasets, methods, and tasks. This corpus contains weakly labeled instances for model training and manually annotated instances for evaluation, providing a valuable resource for advancing SEMD .

  2. Distant Supervision for Corpus Creation: The creation of SciDMT is facilitated by distant supervision, leveraging document-level annotations from the Papers with Code website. This approach results in a main corpus comprising a large volume of machine-learning articles annotated with in-text spans, marking the mentions of datasets, methods, and tasks .

  3. Enhanced Information Extraction: SciDMT goes beyond being just a corpus; it serves as a resource for enhancing information extraction. By annotating full articles and preserving the context of entity mentions, SciDMT aids in term disambiguation and enhances recognition accuracy. Each mention in SciDMT is linkable to Papers with Code, and the introduction of ontology-linking for tasks and datasets further enriches the corpus's utility .

  4. Experimental Setup and Baseline Models: The paper formulates the task of SEMD as a single-sentence tagging task and includes a diverse set of models as baselines in the evaluation, such as Conditional Random Fields (CRF), Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (BiLSTM), BERT, SciBERT, and GPT-3.5. The experiments focus on three categories of scientific entities: datasets, methods, and tasks .

  5. Evaluation of NER Methods: The paper evaluates Named Entity Recognition (NER) methods, including SciBERT and GPT-3.5, on the SciDMT corpus. This evaluation demonstrates the intricate challenges and prospects of SEMD, showcasing the superiority of SciDMT in training SEMD models compared to existing corpora . The SciDMT corpus introduces several key characteristics and advantages compared to previous methods in the field of scientific entity mention detection (SEMD) .

Characteristics:

  1. Comprehensive Entity Annotations: SciDMT is annotated at the document level, covering datasets, methods, and tasks, providing a holistic view of scientific mentions within articles .
  2. Linkable Mentions: Each mention in SciDMT is linkable to Papers with Code (PwC), enhancing the corpus's utility and facilitating information extraction .
  3. Ontology-Linking: SciDMT enriches the corpus by introducing ontology-linking for tasks and datasets, further enhancing the context and understanding of entity mentions .
  4. Scale and Diversity: The SciDMT corpus is the largest known corpus for scientific entity mention detection, offering a vast volume of weakly annotated mentions for model training and manually annotated instances for evaluation .

Advantages Compared to Previous Methods:

  1. Enhanced Information Extraction: By annotating full articles and preserving the context of entity mentions, SciDMT aids in term disambiguation and improves recognition accuracy, surpassing the limitations of previous corpora .
  2. Training Efficacy: SciDMT demonstrates superiority in training SEMD models compared to existing corpora, showcasing its effectiveness in developing competitive models for scientific entity mention detection .
  3. Resource Accessibility: The SciDMT corpus serves as a robust benchmark for the research community, encouraging the development of innovative models to advance the field of scientific information extraction .
  4. Volume and Quality: SciDMT's large-scale corpus, annotated through distant supervision, balances scale and accuracy, offering a valuable resource for training models and advancing SEMD .

In summary, SciDMT's unique characteristics, such as comprehensive annotations, linkable mentions, ontology-linking, scale, and training efficacy, position it as a significant advancement in the field of scientific entity mention detection, surpassing the limitations of previous methods and corpora .


Do any related researches exist? Who are the noteworthy researchers on this topic in this field?What is the key to the solution mentioned in the paper?

Several related researches exist in the field of scientific entity mention detection. Noteworthy researchers in this field include Eduard C. Dragut, Hong Wang, Clement T. Yu, A. Prasad Sistla, Weiyi Meng, Nikolas McNeal, Clay Washington, You Chen, Lang Li, Huan Sun, Yu Su, Omer Levy, Yoav Goldberg, Ido Dagan, Tomas Mikolov, Kai Chen, Greg S. Corrado, Jeffrey Dean, Mike Mintz, Steven Bills, Rion Snow, Daniel Jurafsky, Mark Neumann, Daniel King, Iz Beltagy, Waleed Ammar, Muhammad Abdul-Mageed, Lyle Ungar, Jumanah Alshehri, Marija Stanojevic, Zoran Obradovic, Sanjeev Arora, Yuanzhi Li, Yingyu Liang, Tengyu Ma, Andrej Risteski, Kyle Lo, Arman Cohan, Steven Bird, Ewan Klein, Edward Loper, Priyankar Bose, Sriram Srinivasan, William C. Slee-man, Jatinder Palta, Rishabh Kapoor, Pree-tam Ghosh, Mark Davies, Joseph L. Fleiss, Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, Kristina Toutanova, Jeffrey Pennington, Richard Socher, Christopher Manning, Andrew Schneider, Lihong He, Zhijia Chen, Arjun Mukherjee, Alisa Smirnova, Philippe Cudré-Mauroux, Pontus Stenetorp, Sampo Pyysalo, Goran Topić, Tomoko Ohta, Sophia Ananiadou, Jun’ichi Tsujii, Peng Su, Gang Li, Cathy Wu, K. Vijay-Shanker, Jie Tang, Jing Zhang, Limin Yao, Juanzi Li, Li Zhang, Zhong Su, Shanshan Zhang, Slobodan Vucetic, Yi Luan, Luheng He, Mari Ostendorf, Hannaneh Hajishirzi, Huitong Pan, Qi Zhang, Cornelia Caragea, Longin Jan Latecki, among others .

The key to the solution mentioned in the paper is the development of SciDMT, an enhanced and expanded corpus for scientific mention detection. This corpus contains annotated scientific documents for datasets, methods, and tasks, with a main corpus consisting of 48 thousand scientific articles and an evaluation set of 100 articles manually annotated for evaluation purposes. The scale and diversity of SciDMT are crucial for developing and refining models for tasks such as indexing scientific papers, enhancing information retrieval, and improving the accessibility of scientific knowledge. The paper demonstrates the utility of the corpus through experiments with advanced deep learning architectures like SciBERT and GPT-3.5, establishing performance baselines and highlighting unresolved challenges in scientific mention detection .


How were the experiments in the paper designed?

The experiments in the paper were designed to evaluate various Named Entity Recognition (NER) methods, including Conditional Random Fields (CRF), Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (BiLSTM), BERT, SciBERT, and GPT-3.5 . These methods were trained in 3 rounds using randomly shuffled training sets, with different features and initialization methods for BiLSTM . The models were evaluated on different datasets, and the performance was assessed based on F1 scores . Additionally, the study included the training of SciBERT using different training set sizes to analyze the impact of training scale on model performance . The experiments aimed to showcase the effectiveness of the SciDMT corpus in training SEMD models and evaluating NER methods .


What is the dataset used for quantitative evaluation? Is the code open source?

The dataset used for quantitative evaluation in the study is SciDMT-E* and SciREX-E* . The code used in the study is open source and can be accessed at the following GitHub repository: https://github.com/Coleridge-Initiative/rclc .


Do the experiments and results in the paper provide good support for the scientific hypotheses that need to be verified? Please analyze.

The experiments and results presented in the paper provide substantial support for the scientific hypotheses that need to be verified. The evaluation conducted on the manually annotated evaluation sets, SciDMT-E and SciREX-E, involved assessing the performance of various NER models, including BERT, SciBERT, BiLSTM, and GPT-3.5, on detecting scientific entities . The results indicated that BERT and SciBERT exhibited the highest overall performance, with similar performances on both evaluation sets, suggesting comparable dataset difficulty . Additionally, the study revealed that dataset mentions were generally easier to detect compared to method and task mentions, possibly due to the standardized nature of dataset names .

Moreover, the performance of the models on the unseen subset in SciDMT-E was unexpectedly higher than the overall average performance for BERT and SciBERT, potentially due to the exclusion of more challenging cases in the limited sample size . The findings also highlighted that GPT-3.5, even without fine-tuning, demonstrated knowledge about scientific entities, predicting general concept words and citations as scientific entities . However, GPT-3.5 faced challenges in isolating the correct entity from descriptions with multiple mentions and recognizing mentions with uncommon dash patterns .

Furthermore, the error analysis conducted based on the performance of the best model, SciBERT, identified common patterns among erroneous instances, such as long sequences with multiple mentions and difficulties in recognizing mentions with uncommon dash patterns . This detailed analysis provides valuable insights into the challenges and areas for improvement in detecting scientific entities, contributing to the verification of scientific hypotheses and enhancing the understanding of NER model performance in scientific text processing.


What are the contributions of this paper?

The paper "SciDMT: A Large-Scale Corpus for Detecting Scientific Mentions" makes several significant contributions to the field of scientific entity mention detection (SEMD) :

  • Creation of a Comprehensive Corpus: The paper introduces SciDMT, a corpus that includes annotated scientific documents for datasets, methods, and tasks. It consists of a main corpus with weakly annotated mentions and an evaluation set with manually annotated articles for evaluation purposes.
  • Utilization of Distant Supervision: The creation of SciDMT is facilitated by distant supervision, leveraging document-level annotations from the Papers with Code website. This approach allows for the annotation of 48,049 machine-learning articles with in-text spans, marking mentions of datasets, methods, and tasks.
  • Enhancement of Information Extraction: By annotating full articles and preserving the context of entity mentions, SciDMT aids in term disambiguation and enhances recognition accuracy. Each mention is linkable to Papers with Code, and the introduction of ontology-linking for tasks and datasets enriches the corpus's utility.
  • Advancement of Scientific Information Retrieval: SciDMT serves as a valuable resource for indexing scientific papers, enhancing information retrieval, and making scientific knowledge more accessible.
  • Encouragement of Model Development: The corpus's scale and diversity are instrumental in developing and refining models for tasks such as indexing scientific papers, enhancing information retrieval, and improving the accessibility of scientific knowledge. It encourages the development of innovative models to further the field of scientific information extraction.

What work can be continued in depth?

To further advance the field of scientific entity mention detection (SEMD), several areas of work can be continued in depth based on the information provided in the SciDMT corpus :

  • Expansion of Annotated Entities: Enhancing the corpus by broadening the spectrum of annotated entities can contribute to improving the recognition accuracy and coverage of scientific mentions .
  • Refinement of Weak Labels: Continuously refining weak labels within the corpus can lead to better training data quality and subsequently enhance the performance of SEMD models .
  • Increase Corpus Size: Augmenting the corpus size can provide more diverse and comprehensive data for training advanced scientific information extraction models, thereby improving the overall performance of SEMD .
  • Incorporation of Post-Processing Techniques: Implementing sophisticated post-processing techniques to cleanse distant supervision labels can help improve the quality and reliability of the training data, leading to more accurate SEMD models .
  • Addressing Challenging Instances: Focusing on addressing more challenging instances, such as unseen and ambiguous mentions, can further enhance the performance and robustness of scientific mention detection models .
Tables
1
Scan the QR code to ask more questions about the paper
© 2025 Powerdrill. All rights reserved.