ScenEval: A Benchmark for Scenario-Based Evaluation of Code Generation

Debalina Ghosh Paul, Hong Zhu, Ian Bayley·June 18, 2024

Summary

The paper "ScenEval: A Benchmark for Scenario-Based Evaluation of Code Generation" presents a comprehensive framework for assessing large language models' code generation abilities, using ScenEval, a benchmark derived from textbooks, tutorials, and Stack Overflow. The dataset includes 12,864 Java programming tasks with metadata on complexity, designed to test models like ChatGPT in different scenarios. The study finds that ChatGPT's performance decreases with task complexity, struggling with advanced topics, and that generated code often has higher complexity when correct but lower when incorrect. ScenEval improves upon existing benchmarks by incorporating scenario information and supporting automated testing through Morphy, a system with test morphisms for filtering and analyzing tasks. The paper highlights the importance of scenario-based testing in ML applications and suggests future work on expanding the test suite and evaluating other code qualities and models.

Key findings

6

Paper digest

What problem does the paper attempt to solve? Is this a new problem?

The paper aims to address the problem of constructing efficient and effective datasets that represent various scenarios for testing and evaluating the capability of large language models (LLMs) in code generation . This is not a new problem as scenario-based testing has been widely used in traditional software testing and safety critical applications, but the challenge lies in applying this method to sophisticated ML models like LLMs . The paper proposes a methodology to construct a benchmark called ScenEval, attach metadata to test cases, and develop a test system with test morphisms to filter test cases based on metadata, enabling scenario-based testing and evaluation of LLMs for code generation .


What scientific hypothesis does this paper seek to validate?

This paper aims to validate the scientific hypothesis related to the scenario-based evaluation of machine learning models, specifically large language models (LLMs), for code generation . The hypothesis revolves around constructing benchmark datasets with metadata to represent various scenarios efficiently and effectively, enabling thorough testing and evaluation of an LLM's capability in generating code . The methodology proposed in the paper involves constructing a benchmark called ScenEval from problems in textbooks, online tutorial websites, and Stack Overflow, and then using test morphisms to filter test cases based on metadata to form datasets for evaluation . The research goal is to gain insight into how ChatGPT, a large language model, performs on tasks from textbooks and real-world questions by applying scenario-based evaluation techniques . The paper also delves into analyzing the performance of ChatGPT on tasks of various topics and complexity, providing valuable insights into the model's strengths and weaknesses in code generation .


What new ideas, methods, or models does the paper propose? What are the characteristics and advantages compared to previous methods?

The paper "ScenEval: A Benchmark for Scenario-Based Evaluation of Code Generation" proposes a novel methodology for scenario-based evaluation of machine learning models, specifically focusing on large language models (LLMs) for code generation . The key innovation lies in constructing a benchmark named ScenEval, which is developed from problems sourced from textbooks, online tutorials, and Stack Overflow, with metadata attached to each test case. This metadata enables the construction of a test system with test morphisms that filter test cases based on metadata to form datasets .

One of the main contributions of the paper is the application of scenario-based evaluation techniques to assess the performance of ChatGPT, a large language model, on tasks from textbooks and real-world questions . By creating two test datasets - one with textbook tasks and the other with real-world tasks - and using test morphisms to filter tasks, the paper evaluates ChatGPT's performance. The results show that ChatGPT's performance varies based on the complexity of the coding tasks, with lower performance observed for advanced topics like multi-threading, data structure algorithms, and recursive methods .

Furthermore, the paper introduces the concept of test morphisms, such as filterBySources, filterByTopics, and filterByComplexity, to categorize and evaluate tasks based on different criteria like sources, topics, and complexity levels . These test morphisms enable a detailed analysis of ChatGPT's performance across various scenarios, providing insights into how the model performs on different types of coding tasks.

Additionally, the paper emphasizes the importance of metadata in structuring benchmark datasets to represent various scenarios efficiently and to support scenario-based testing and evaluation of LLMs . The proposed methodology not only considers correctness and complexity but also aims to evaluate other aspects of code quality, highlighting the ongoing efforts to automate the testing and evaluation process for multiple LLMs in code generation .

In conclusion, the paper presents a comprehensive approach to scenario-based evaluation of LLMs for code generation, introducing innovative methods like constructing benchmarks with metadata, applying test morphisms for task categorization, and analyzing performance based on different criteria. These contributions advance the field of machine learning evaluation by providing a structured framework for assessing the capabilities of large language models in code generation tasks . The paper "ScenEval: A Benchmark for Scenario-Based Evaluation of Code Generation" introduces a novel approach to structuring benchmark datasets with metadata to represent various scenarios efficiently and support scenario-based testing and evaluation of large language models (LLMs) for code generation . This methodology involves constructing a benchmark named ScenEval, which includes problems sourced from textbooks, online tutorials, and Stack Overflow, with metadata attached to each test case. By utilizing test morphisms like filterByTopics and filterByComplexity, the paper demonstrates the ability to filter test cases based on metadata to form datasets for evaluation .

Compared to existing methods that rely on informal judgments of task difficulty, the paper measures task complexity using cyclomatic complexity and evaluates performance on subsets of different complexities . This structured approach confirms that the decrease in performance with complexity is not coincidental, as tasks in certain topics are inherently more complex than others . Additionally, the paper highlights the flexibility and ease of managing the test system using the Morphy testing tool, which integrates various software engineering tools like PMD and EvoSuite .

One key advantage of the proposed methodology is the detailed analysis it enables regarding the performance of large language models like ChatGPT on coding tasks from textbooks and real-world scenarios . By categorizing tasks based on topics and complexity levels, the paper reveals that ChatGPT's performance decreases with the complexity of coding tasks, particularly struggling with advanced topics such as multi-threading and data structures . This structured evaluation approach provides valuable insights into the model's strengths and weaknesses across different scenarios.

Moreover, the paper emphasizes the importance of metadata in constructing benchmark datasets, allowing for efficient scenario-based testing and evaluation of LLMs . By associating metadata with each task, the methodology facilitates the formulation of scenarios and contributes to a comprehensive analysis of LLM performance . The use of test morphisms for dataset filtering, result analysis, and data distribution analysis enhances the effectiveness and efficiency of scenario-based testing and evaluation .

In conclusion, the proposed methodology in the paper offers a structured and systematic approach to scenario-based evaluation of LLMs for code generation, providing advantages such as detailed performance analysis, flexibility in managing the test system, and efficient scenario representation through metadata . By addressing task complexity, topic variations, and performance metrics, this approach enhances the understanding of LLM capabilities and performance in coding tasks, paving the way for more comprehensive evaluations in the field of machine learning .


Do any related researches exist? Who are the noteworthy researchers on this topic in this field?What is the key to the solution mentioned in the paper?

Several related research papers exist in the field of scenario-based evaluation of code generation. Noteworthy researchers in this field include A. Amini, X. Du, T. Miah, H. Zhu, S. Kulal, S. Ren, Y. D. Liang, W. Savitch, H. Schildt, N. Dale, C. Weems, M. Headington, G. Fraser, A. Arcuri, S. Riedmaier, T. Ponn, D. Ludwig, B. Schick, F. Diermeyer, W. Ding, C. Xu, M. Arief, H. Lin, B. Li, D. Zhao, I. Jacobson, D. Liu, I. Bayley, R. Harrison, F. Cuzzolin, I. Bayley, X. Zheng, and many others .

The key to the solution mentioned in the paper is the use of scenario-based evaluation techniques to structure benchmark datasets with metadata, enabling a thorough analysis of large language models' (LLMs) performance in code generation tasks. By creating subsets of tasks based on topics, complexities, and sources, researchers were able to evaluate the performance of LLMs like ChatGPT on different scenarios, such as textbook questions and real-world questions. This approach allowed for a detailed examination of how LLMs perform on various topics and complexities, providing valuable insights for improving their capabilities .


How were the experiments in the paper designed?

The experiments in the paper were designed as follows:

  • Test cases were generated by applying the generateTestCode test morphism, which produced a JUnit test class with test cases derived from the reference solution, including expected outputs checked using assertions. Incorrect test cases that failed on the reference solution were removed by invoking the test morphism purifyReferenceTestCode .
  • The experiments aimed to evaluate ChatGPT's performance on tasks from textbooks and real-world questions. Two test datasets were created: one with textbook tasks and the other with real-world tasks. ChatGPT was then tested on these datasets. The pass rates for textbook tasks were 75.64% pass@1 and an overall average pass rate of 82.4%, while for real-world tasks, the pass rate was 67.07% pass@1 with an overall average pass rate of 74.34% .
  • The complexity of tasks was measured using cyclomatic complexity, and performances were evaluated on subsets of different complexities. It was observed that the performance of ChatGPT decreased with the complexity of the coding task, especially for advanced topics like multi-threading, data structure algorithms, and recursive methods .
  • The experiments also involved splitting test datasets into sub-datasets based on topics and complexities using test morphisms filterByTopics and filterByComplexity. ChatGPT's performance was evaluated on these sub-datasets, revealing that it performed worst on topics such as streams, multi-threading, lambda expressions, and data structures. The decline in performance with complexity was found to be consistent across all topics, indicating it was not a coincidence .

What is the dataset used for quantitative evaluation? Is the code open source?

The dataset used for quantitative evaluation in the context of code generation benchmarks is called ScenEval . The code generation benchmarks, including ScenEval, are not explicitly mentioned to be open source in the provided context. The focus of the context is on constructing benchmarks for evaluating machine learning models as code generation tools, particularly large language models like ChatGPT, rather than on the open-source nature of the code .


Do the experiments and results in the paper provide good support for the scientific hypotheses that need to be verified? Please analyze.

The experiments and results presented in the paper provide substantial support for the scientific hypotheses that needed verification. The study focused on evaluating ChatGPT's performance on textbooks and real-world questions using scenario-based evaluation techniques . The experiments involved creating test datasets based on different scenarios, such as tasks from textbooks and real-world questions, and analyzing ChatGPT's performance on these datasets . The results indicated that ChatGPT's pass rates were 75.64% for textbook tasks and 67.07% for real-world tasks, demonstrating a clear difference in performance between the two scenarios .

Furthermore, the paper delved into analyzing ChatGPT's performance on tasks of various topics and complexities, revealing that the model's performance decreases as the cyclomatic complexity of the task increases . The study also highlighted that ChatGPT performed worst on topics like streams, multi-threading, lambda expressions, and data structures . This detailed analysis provides valuable insights into how ChatGPT handles different types of tasks and complexities, aligning with the scientific hypotheses under investigation.

Moreover, the paper discussed the methodology of constructing benchmark datasets with metadata to represent various scenarios and developing a test system for scenario-based testing and evaluation of large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT . By structuring the benchmark datasets and analyzing the performance of ChatGPT on different scenarios and complexities, the study effectively addressed the research goal of gaining insight into how ChatGPT performs on various types of tasks .

In conclusion, the experiments and results presented in the paper offer strong support for the scientific hypotheses that needed verification. The detailed analysis of ChatGPT's performance on different scenarios, topics, and complexities, along with the methodology employed for constructing benchmark datasets, contribute significantly to the understanding of large language models' performance in code generation tasks.


What are the contributions of this paper?

The paper "ScenEval: A Benchmark for Scenario-Based Evaluation of Code Generation" makes several key contributions:

  • Construction of a benchmark dataset: The paper proposes a methodology to construct a benchmark dataset with metadata attached to each test case, enabling the development of a test system using test morphisms to filter test cases based on metadata .
  • Scenario-based evaluation of large language models (LLMs): The benchmark, ScenEval, is created from problems in textbooks, online tutorial websites, and Stack Overflow, allowing for the evaluation of ChatGPT for Java code generation based on scenarios .
  • Insight into ChatGPT performance: The experiments conducted in the paper reveal that the performance of ChatGPT decreases with the complexity of coding tasks, particularly struggling with advanced topics like multi-threading, data structure algorithms, and recursive methods .
  • Analysis of generated code: The paper compares the complexity of the generated code by ChatGPT with reference solutions, showing that the generated code tends to be shorter but more complex in terms of cyclomatic and cognitive complexity metrics when correct. However, incorrect code generated by ChatGPT is likely to be less complex than the reference solution .

What work can be continued in depth?

The work reported in the document can be further developed in several areas:

  • Expanding Test System: The test system can be enhanced by incorporating more test morphisms to analyze the quality of program code beyond correctness and complexity, considering other aspects of code quality .
  • Testing and Evaluating LLMs: Further exploration can be done on testing and evaluating various Large Language Models (LLMs) for code generation by implementing test morphisms for each LLM to assess their performance based on queries and responses .
  • Automation of Comparisons: Efforts can be directed towards automating the comparison process between multiple LLMs to streamline the evaluation process, which would otherwise be time-consuming and labor-intensive if done manually .

Tables

4

Introduction
Background
[Lack of scenario-based evaluation in code generation]
[Importance of large language models in code assistance]
Objective
[Formulation of ScenEval benchmark]
[Goal: Assess code generation abilities in diverse scenarios]
Method
Data Collection
Source Selection
[Textbooks, tutorials, and Stack Overflow]
[12,864 Java programming tasks]
Task Complexity and Metadata
[Variety of tasks to test model performance]
[Complexity levels and scenario differentiation]
ChatGPT Performance Analysis
[Task complexity vs. model performance]
[Advantages and limitations in handling advanced topics]
Data Preprocessing
ScenEval Dataset Construction
[Filtering and curation process]
[Incorporation of scenario information]
Morphy: Automated Testing System
[Test morphisms for task analysis]
[Role in filtering and evaluating generated code]
Evaluation Results
[ChatGPT's performance trends]
[Complexity comparison of correct and incorrect code]
Comparison with Existing Benchmarks
[Strengths of ScenEval over previous benchmarks]
[Scenario-based testing as a novelty]
Future Directions
Expanding Test Suite
[Potential for more scenarios and tasks]
Code Quality Assessment
[Incorporating additional evaluation criteria]
[Model comparison beyond code generation]
Limitations and Opportunities
[Areas for improvement in ScenEval]
[Challenges and directions for future research]
Basic info
papers
software engineering
artificial intelligence
Advanced features
Insights
What is the primary focus of the "ScenEval" paper?
Which benchmark does the paper introduce for evaluating code generation by large language models?
What does the study about ChatGPT reveal regarding its performance with increasing task complexity?
How many Java programming tasks are included in the ScenEval dataset?

ScenEval: A Benchmark for Scenario-Based Evaluation of Code Generation

Debalina Ghosh Paul, Hong Zhu, Ian Bayley·June 18, 2024

Summary

The paper "ScenEval: A Benchmark for Scenario-Based Evaluation of Code Generation" presents a comprehensive framework for assessing large language models' code generation abilities, using ScenEval, a benchmark derived from textbooks, tutorials, and Stack Overflow. The dataset includes 12,864 Java programming tasks with metadata on complexity, designed to test models like ChatGPT in different scenarios. The study finds that ChatGPT's performance decreases with task complexity, struggling with advanced topics, and that generated code often has higher complexity when correct but lower when incorrect. ScenEval improves upon existing benchmarks by incorporating scenario information and supporting automated testing through Morphy, a system with test morphisms for filtering and analyzing tasks. The paper highlights the importance of scenario-based testing in ML applications and suggests future work on expanding the test suite and evaluating other code qualities and models.
Mind map
[12,864 Java programming tasks]
[Textbooks, tutorials, and Stack Overflow]
[Challenges and directions for future research]
[Areas for improvement in ScenEval]
[Model comparison beyond code generation]
[Incorporating additional evaluation criteria]
[Potential for more scenarios and tasks]
[Role in filtering and evaluating generated code]
[Test morphisms for task analysis]
[Incorporation of scenario information]
[Filtering and curation process]
[Advantages and limitations in handling advanced topics]
[Task complexity vs. model performance]
[Complexity levels and scenario differentiation]
[Variety of tasks to test model performance]
Source Selection
[Goal: Assess code generation abilities in diverse scenarios]
[Formulation of ScenEval benchmark]
[Importance of large language models in code assistance]
[Lack of scenario-based evaluation in code generation]
Limitations and Opportunities
Code Quality Assessment
Expanding Test Suite
[Scenario-based testing as a novelty]
[Strengths of ScenEval over previous benchmarks]
[Complexity comparison of correct and incorrect code]
[ChatGPT's performance trends]
Morphy: Automated Testing System
ScenEval Dataset Construction
ChatGPT Performance Analysis
Task Complexity and Metadata
Data Collection
Objective
Background
Future Directions
Comparison with Existing Benchmarks
Evaluation Results
Data Preprocessing
Method
Introduction
Outline
Introduction
Background
[Lack of scenario-based evaluation in code generation]
[Importance of large language models in code assistance]
Objective
[Formulation of ScenEval benchmark]
[Goal: Assess code generation abilities in diverse scenarios]
Method
Data Collection
Source Selection
[Textbooks, tutorials, and Stack Overflow]
[12,864 Java programming tasks]
Task Complexity and Metadata
[Variety of tasks to test model performance]
[Complexity levels and scenario differentiation]
ChatGPT Performance Analysis
[Task complexity vs. model performance]
[Advantages and limitations in handling advanced topics]
Data Preprocessing
ScenEval Dataset Construction
[Filtering and curation process]
[Incorporation of scenario information]
Morphy: Automated Testing System
[Test morphisms for task analysis]
[Role in filtering and evaluating generated code]
Evaluation Results
[ChatGPT's performance trends]
[Complexity comparison of correct and incorrect code]
Comparison with Existing Benchmarks
[Strengths of ScenEval over previous benchmarks]
[Scenario-based testing as a novelty]
Future Directions
Expanding Test Suite
[Potential for more scenarios and tasks]
Code Quality Assessment
[Incorporating additional evaluation criteria]
[Model comparison beyond code generation]
Limitations and Opportunities
[Areas for improvement in ScenEval]
[Challenges and directions for future research]
Key findings
6

Paper digest

What problem does the paper attempt to solve? Is this a new problem?

The paper aims to address the problem of constructing efficient and effective datasets that represent various scenarios for testing and evaluating the capability of large language models (LLMs) in code generation . This is not a new problem as scenario-based testing has been widely used in traditional software testing and safety critical applications, but the challenge lies in applying this method to sophisticated ML models like LLMs . The paper proposes a methodology to construct a benchmark called ScenEval, attach metadata to test cases, and develop a test system with test morphisms to filter test cases based on metadata, enabling scenario-based testing and evaluation of LLMs for code generation .


What scientific hypothesis does this paper seek to validate?

This paper aims to validate the scientific hypothesis related to the scenario-based evaluation of machine learning models, specifically large language models (LLMs), for code generation . The hypothesis revolves around constructing benchmark datasets with metadata to represent various scenarios efficiently and effectively, enabling thorough testing and evaluation of an LLM's capability in generating code . The methodology proposed in the paper involves constructing a benchmark called ScenEval from problems in textbooks, online tutorial websites, and Stack Overflow, and then using test morphisms to filter test cases based on metadata to form datasets for evaluation . The research goal is to gain insight into how ChatGPT, a large language model, performs on tasks from textbooks and real-world questions by applying scenario-based evaluation techniques . The paper also delves into analyzing the performance of ChatGPT on tasks of various topics and complexity, providing valuable insights into the model's strengths and weaknesses in code generation .


What new ideas, methods, or models does the paper propose? What are the characteristics and advantages compared to previous methods?

The paper "ScenEval: A Benchmark for Scenario-Based Evaluation of Code Generation" proposes a novel methodology for scenario-based evaluation of machine learning models, specifically focusing on large language models (LLMs) for code generation . The key innovation lies in constructing a benchmark named ScenEval, which is developed from problems sourced from textbooks, online tutorials, and Stack Overflow, with metadata attached to each test case. This metadata enables the construction of a test system with test morphisms that filter test cases based on metadata to form datasets .

One of the main contributions of the paper is the application of scenario-based evaluation techniques to assess the performance of ChatGPT, a large language model, on tasks from textbooks and real-world questions . By creating two test datasets - one with textbook tasks and the other with real-world tasks - and using test morphisms to filter tasks, the paper evaluates ChatGPT's performance. The results show that ChatGPT's performance varies based on the complexity of the coding tasks, with lower performance observed for advanced topics like multi-threading, data structure algorithms, and recursive methods .

Furthermore, the paper introduces the concept of test morphisms, such as filterBySources, filterByTopics, and filterByComplexity, to categorize and evaluate tasks based on different criteria like sources, topics, and complexity levels . These test morphisms enable a detailed analysis of ChatGPT's performance across various scenarios, providing insights into how the model performs on different types of coding tasks.

Additionally, the paper emphasizes the importance of metadata in structuring benchmark datasets to represent various scenarios efficiently and to support scenario-based testing and evaluation of LLMs . The proposed methodology not only considers correctness and complexity but also aims to evaluate other aspects of code quality, highlighting the ongoing efforts to automate the testing and evaluation process for multiple LLMs in code generation .

In conclusion, the paper presents a comprehensive approach to scenario-based evaluation of LLMs for code generation, introducing innovative methods like constructing benchmarks with metadata, applying test morphisms for task categorization, and analyzing performance based on different criteria. These contributions advance the field of machine learning evaluation by providing a structured framework for assessing the capabilities of large language models in code generation tasks . The paper "ScenEval: A Benchmark for Scenario-Based Evaluation of Code Generation" introduces a novel approach to structuring benchmark datasets with metadata to represent various scenarios efficiently and support scenario-based testing and evaluation of large language models (LLMs) for code generation . This methodology involves constructing a benchmark named ScenEval, which includes problems sourced from textbooks, online tutorials, and Stack Overflow, with metadata attached to each test case. By utilizing test morphisms like filterByTopics and filterByComplexity, the paper demonstrates the ability to filter test cases based on metadata to form datasets for evaluation .

Compared to existing methods that rely on informal judgments of task difficulty, the paper measures task complexity using cyclomatic complexity and evaluates performance on subsets of different complexities . This structured approach confirms that the decrease in performance with complexity is not coincidental, as tasks in certain topics are inherently more complex than others . Additionally, the paper highlights the flexibility and ease of managing the test system using the Morphy testing tool, which integrates various software engineering tools like PMD and EvoSuite .

One key advantage of the proposed methodology is the detailed analysis it enables regarding the performance of large language models like ChatGPT on coding tasks from textbooks and real-world scenarios . By categorizing tasks based on topics and complexity levels, the paper reveals that ChatGPT's performance decreases with the complexity of coding tasks, particularly struggling with advanced topics such as multi-threading and data structures . This structured evaluation approach provides valuable insights into the model's strengths and weaknesses across different scenarios.

Moreover, the paper emphasizes the importance of metadata in constructing benchmark datasets, allowing for efficient scenario-based testing and evaluation of LLMs . By associating metadata with each task, the methodology facilitates the formulation of scenarios and contributes to a comprehensive analysis of LLM performance . The use of test morphisms for dataset filtering, result analysis, and data distribution analysis enhances the effectiveness and efficiency of scenario-based testing and evaluation .

In conclusion, the proposed methodology in the paper offers a structured and systematic approach to scenario-based evaluation of LLMs for code generation, providing advantages such as detailed performance analysis, flexibility in managing the test system, and efficient scenario representation through metadata . By addressing task complexity, topic variations, and performance metrics, this approach enhances the understanding of LLM capabilities and performance in coding tasks, paving the way for more comprehensive evaluations in the field of machine learning .


Do any related researches exist? Who are the noteworthy researchers on this topic in this field?What is the key to the solution mentioned in the paper?

Several related research papers exist in the field of scenario-based evaluation of code generation. Noteworthy researchers in this field include A. Amini, X. Du, T. Miah, H. Zhu, S. Kulal, S. Ren, Y. D. Liang, W. Savitch, H. Schildt, N. Dale, C. Weems, M. Headington, G. Fraser, A. Arcuri, S. Riedmaier, T. Ponn, D. Ludwig, B. Schick, F. Diermeyer, W. Ding, C. Xu, M. Arief, H. Lin, B. Li, D. Zhao, I. Jacobson, D. Liu, I. Bayley, R. Harrison, F. Cuzzolin, I. Bayley, X. Zheng, and many others .

The key to the solution mentioned in the paper is the use of scenario-based evaluation techniques to structure benchmark datasets with metadata, enabling a thorough analysis of large language models' (LLMs) performance in code generation tasks. By creating subsets of tasks based on topics, complexities, and sources, researchers were able to evaluate the performance of LLMs like ChatGPT on different scenarios, such as textbook questions and real-world questions. This approach allowed for a detailed examination of how LLMs perform on various topics and complexities, providing valuable insights for improving their capabilities .


How were the experiments in the paper designed?

The experiments in the paper were designed as follows:

  • Test cases were generated by applying the generateTestCode test morphism, which produced a JUnit test class with test cases derived from the reference solution, including expected outputs checked using assertions. Incorrect test cases that failed on the reference solution were removed by invoking the test morphism purifyReferenceTestCode .
  • The experiments aimed to evaluate ChatGPT's performance on tasks from textbooks and real-world questions. Two test datasets were created: one with textbook tasks and the other with real-world tasks. ChatGPT was then tested on these datasets. The pass rates for textbook tasks were 75.64% pass@1 and an overall average pass rate of 82.4%, while for real-world tasks, the pass rate was 67.07% pass@1 with an overall average pass rate of 74.34% .
  • The complexity of tasks was measured using cyclomatic complexity, and performances were evaluated on subsets of different complexities. It was observed that the performance of ChatGPT decreased with the complexity of the coding task, especially for advanced topics like multi-threading, data structure algorithms, and recursive methods .
  • The experiments also involved splitting test datasets into sub-datasets based on topics and complexities using test morphisms filterByTopics and filterByComplexity. ChatGPT's performance was evaluated on these sub-datasets, revealing that it performed worst on topics such as streams, multi-threading, lambda expressions, and data structures. The decline in performance with complexity was found to be consistent across all topics, indicating it was not a coincidence .

What is the dataset used for quantitative evaluation? Is the code open source?

The dataset used for quantitative evaluation in the context of code generation benchmarks is called ScenEval . The code generation benchmarks, including ScenEval, are not explicitly mentioned to be open source in the provided context. The focus of the context is on constructing benchmarks for evaluating machine learning models as code generation tools, particularly large language models like ChatGPT, rather than on the open-source nature of the code .


Do the experiments and results in the paper provide good support for the scientific hypotheses that need to be verified? Please analyze.

The experiments and results presented in the paper provide substantial support for the scientific hypotheses that needed verification. The study focused on evaluating ChatGPT's performance on textbooks and real-world questions using scenario-based evaluation techniques . The experiments involved creating test datasets based on different scenarios, such as tasks from textbooks and real-world questions, and analyzing ChatGPT's performance on these datasets . The results indicated that ChatGPT's pass rates were 75.64% for textbook tasks and 67.07% for real-world tasks, demonstrating a clear difference in performance between the two scenarios .

Furthermore, the paper delved into analyzing ChatGPT's performance on tasks of various topics and complexities, revealing that the model's performance decreases as the cyclomatic complexity of the task increases . The study also highlighted that ChatGPT performed worst on topics like streams, multi-threading, lambda expressions, and data structures . This detailed analysis provides valuable insights into how ChatGPT handles different types of tasks and complexities, aligning with the scientific hypotheses under investigation.

Moreover, the paper discussed the methodology of constructing benchmark datasets with metadata to represent various scenarios and developing a test system for scenario-based testing and evaluation of large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT . By structuring the benchmark datasets and analyzing the performance of ChatGPT on different scenarios and complexities, the study effectively addressed the research goal of gaining insight into how ChatGPT performs on various types of tasks .

In conclusion, the experiments and results presented in the paper offer strong support for the scientific hypotheses that needed verification. The detailed analysis of ChatGPT's performance on different scenarios, topics, and complexities, along with the methodology employed for constructing benchmark datasets, contribute significantly to the understanding of large language models' performance in code generation tasks.


What are the contributions of this paper?

The paper "ScenEval: A Benchmark for Scenario-Based Evaluation of Code Generation" makes several key contributions:

  • Construction of a benchmark dataset: The paper proposes a methodology to construct a benchmark dataset with metadata attached to each test case, enabling the development of a test system using test morphisms to filter test cases based on metadata .
  • Scenario-based evaluation of large language models (LLMs): The benchmark, ScenEval, is created from problems in textbooks, online tutorial websites, and Stack Overflow, allowing for the evaluation of ChatGPT for Java code generation based on scenarios .
  • Insight into ChatGPT performance: The experiments conducted in the paper reveal that the performance of ChatGPT decreases with the complexity of coding tasks, particularly struggling with advanced topics like multi-threading, data structure algorithms, and recursive methods .
  • Analysis of generated code: The paper compares the complexity of the generated code by ChatGPT with reference solutions, showing that the generated code tends to be shorter but more complex in terms of cyclomatic and cognitive complexity metrics when correct. However, incorrect code generated by ChatGPT is likely to be less complex than the reference solution .

What work can be continued in depth?

The work reported in the document can be further developed in several areas:

  • Expanding Test System: The test system can be enhanced by incorporating more test morphisms to analyze the quality of program code beyond correctness and complexity, considering other aspects of code quality .
  • Testing and Evaluating LLMs: Further exploration can be done on testing and evaluating various Large Language Models (LLMs) for code generation by implementing test morphisms for each LLM to assess their performance based on queries and responses .
  • Automation of Comparisons: Efforts can be directed towards automating the comparison process between multiple LLMs to streamline the evaluation process, which would otherwise be time-consuming and labor-intensive if done manually .
Tables
4
Scan the QR code to ask more questions about the paper
© 2025 Powerdrill. All rights reserved.