SVFT: Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning with Singular Vectors

Vijay Lingam, Atula Tejaswi, Aditya Vavre, Aneesh Shetty, Gautham Krishna Gudur, Joydeep Ghosh, Alex Dimakis, Eunsol Choi, Aleksandar Bojchevski, Sujay Sanghavi·May 30, 2024

Summary

This paper introduces SVFT (Singular Vector Fine-Tuning), a novel parameter-efficient fine-tuning method for large-scale foundation models. Unlike LoRA and DoRA, SVFT updates model weights using sparse outer products of singular vectors, allowing for more fine-grained expressivity with significantly fewer trainable parameters (0.006% to 0.25% compared to 0.03% to 0.8% for other methods). The method outperforms competitors, achieving up to 96% of full fine-tuning performance while maintaining a much smaller footprint. SVFT offers higher accuracy and efficiency by adapting weight matrices with structure-aware updates, theoretically having higher rank perturbations than prior techniques. Experiments on language and vision tasks demonstrate its effectiveness, with variants like SVFTP showing competitive performance with fewer parameters, especially in tasks like mathematical reasoning and natural language generation. The study also explores the impact of different sparsity patterns and compares SVFT to other methods like LoRA, DoRA, and VeRA, highlighting its potential for more accessible and efficient model personalization.

Key findings

6

Paper digest

What problem does the paper attempt to solve? Is this a new problem?

The paper "SVFT: Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning with Singular Vectors" aims to address the challenge of parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) in machine learning models, specifically focusing on methods like LoRA and its variants that freeze pre-trained model weights and introduce learnable matrices for efficient adaptation . This paper introduces SVFT as a novel approach that differs fundamentally from existing methods by structuring weight updates based on the specific weight matrix, allowing for fine-grained control over expressivity through the number of coefficients . While the problem of parameter-efficient fine-tuning is not new, the approach proposed in SVFT presents a unique solution by updating weights as a sparse combination of outer products of singular vectors, demonstrating superior performance with significantly fewer trainable parameters compared to existing methods .


What scientific hypothesis does this paper seek to validate?

This paper seeks to validate the scientific hypothesis that the structure imposed on weight updates in fine-tuning methods can significantly impact the performance and efficiency of the adaptation process . The hypothesis revolves around the idea that by updating weights as a sparse combination of outer products of singular vectors, training only the coefficients of these combinations, fine-tuning models can achieve high performance while utilizing a minimal set of new parameters . The study aims to demonstrate that this approach, known as Singular Vectors guided Fine-Tuning (SVFT), can recover up to 96% of the full fine-tuning performance while training only a very small percentage of parameters, outperforming existing methods in terms of efficiency and performance .


What new ideas, methods, or models does the paper propose? What are the characteristics and advantages compared to previous methods?

The paper proposes a novel approach called Singular Vectors guided Fine-Tuning (SVFT) as a parameter-efficient fine-tuning method . SVFT introduces a unique strategy where the structure imposed on the weight update matrix (∆W) is dependent on the specific weight matrix (W) being updated . This method updates W as a sparse combination of outer products of its singular vectors, training only the coefficients of these sparse combinations, allowing for fine-grained control over expressivity through the number of coefficients .

SVFT fundamentally differs from existing methods like LoRA and its variants by updating W based on a sparse combination of its singular vectors, which is a departure from freezing pre-trained model weights and injecting learnable matrices as done in traditional methods . The paper highlights that SVFT can recover up to 96% of full fine-tuning performance while training only 0.006 to 0.25% of parameters, outperforming existing methods that recover up to 85% performance using 0.03 to 0.8% of the trainable parameter budget .

Furthermore, SVFT benefits more from better pre-trained weights compared to other methods like LoRA, showcasing the importance of quality pre-trained weights in the SVFT approach . The paper also discusses the limitations of SVFT, such as increased GPU memory usage compared to some methods like LoRA, but suggests that memory concerns can be addressed through system-level optimizations like mixed-precision weights and exploring quantization techniques in future work .

In summary, SVFT introduces a novel fine-tuning approach that optimizes the weight update process by leveraging the singular vectors of the pre-trained weight matrix, leading to significant performance improvements with minimal additional parameters, making it a promising method for efficient model adaptation .

Characteristics and Advantages of SVFT Compared to Previous Methods:

Characteristics of SVFT:

  • Structure-Dependent Weight Update: SVFT updates the weight matrix W as a sparse combination of outer products of its singular vectors, training only the coefficients of these sparse combinations, allowing for fine-grained control over expressivity through the number of coefficients .
  • Parameter Efficiency: SVFT significantly reduces the number of learnable parameters while maintaining performance, with only 0.006 to 0.25% of parameters trained, outperforming existing methods that require 0.03 to 0.8% of the trainable parameter budget .
  • Quality Pre-Trained Weights Impact: SVFT benefits more from better pre-trained weights compared to other methods like LoRA, showcasing the importance of quality pre-trained weights in the SVFT approach .
  • Performance Recovery: SVFT can recover up to 96% of full fine-tuning performance while training a minimal percentage of parameters, demonstrating its effectiveness in model adaptation .

Advantages of SVFT Over Previous Methods:

  • Improved Performance: SVFT outperforms existing methods like LoRA by recovering up to 96% of full fine-tuning performance, surpassing the performance of methods like DoRA that recover 86% with more parameters .
  • Efficient Parameterization: SVFT offers a more parameter-efficient fine-tuning approach compared to methods like LoRA, achieving superior performance with significantly fewer trainable parameters .
  • Flexibility and Control: SVFT provides fine-grained control over expressivity through the number of coefficients trained, allowing for tailored adjustments in model adaptation .
  • Memory Optimization: While SVFT incurs some additional GPU memory usage compared to certain methods, memory concerns can be addressed through system-level optimizations like mixed-precision weights and exploring quantization techniques in future work .

In summary, SVFT stands out for its innovative structure-dependent weight update approach, superior parameter efficiency, performance recovery capabilities, and the flexibility it offers in model adaptation, making it a promising method for efficient fine-tuning with notable advantages over existing techniques .


Do any related researches exist? Who are the noteworthy researchers on this topic in this field?What is the key to the solution mentioned in the paper?

Several related research works exist in the field of parameter-efficient fine-tuning with singular vectors. Noteworthy researchers in this area include Karl Moritz Hermann, Tomáš Koˇciský, Edward Grefenstette, Neil Houlsby, Andrei Giurgiu, Edward J Hu, Yelong Shen, and many others . The key solution proposed in the paper "SVFT: Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning with Singular Vectors" is the Singular Vectors guided Fine-Tuning (SVFT) method. This method updates the pre-trained weight matrix by applying a structured, learned weight update that depends on the specific weight matrix W. It involves training only the coefficients (scales) of sparse combinations of outer products of singular vectors, allowing fine-grained control over expressivity through the number of coefficients .


How were the experiments in the paper designed?

The experiments in the paper were designed to evaluate the performance of the proposed method, SVFT, for parameter-efficient fine-tuning of pre-trained models . The experiments involved comparing SVFT with other existing methods such as LoRA, DoRA, BOFT, and VeRA . These comparisons were conducted across various tasks including natural language generation (NLG) tasks like GSM-8K and MATH, as well as commonsense reasoning benchmarks and natural language understanding (NLU) tasks . Additionally, the experiments extended to vision tasks encompassing benchmarks like CIFAR-100, Food101, RESISC45, and Flowers102 . The performance of SVFT was assessed based on accuracy metrics and the number of trainable parameters used, highlighting its superior or competitive performance with significantly fewer parameters compared to other methods .


What is the dataset used for quantitative evaluation? Is the code open source?

The dataset used for quantitative evaluation includes various benchmarks for both language and vision tasks. For natural language generation tasks, the evaluation is conducted on benchmarks such as GSM-8K, MATH, and MetaMathQA-40K, along with 8 commonsense reasoning benchmarks like BoolQ, PIQA, and WinoGrande . Additionally, for natural language understanding tasks, the evaluation is performed on the General Language Understanding Evaluation (GLUE) benchmark . In terms of vision tasks, the experiments cover benchmarks like CIFAR-100, Food101, RESISC45, and Flowers102 .

Regarding the code, the provided context does not mention whether the code used for the evaluation is open source or not. To determine the availability of the code, it would be necessary to refer to the specific publication or research paper associated with the dataset and evaluation mentioned in the context .


Do the experiments and results in the paper provide good support for the scientific hypotheses that need to be verified? Please analyze.

The experiments and results presented in the paper provide strong support for the scientific hypotheses that needed verification. The study introduces SVFT, a novel approach for parameter-efficient fine-tuning that differs fundamentally from existing methods by updating weights as a sparse combination of outer products of singular vectors, training only the coefficients of these combinations . The experiments conducted on language and vision benchmarks demonstrate that SVFT can recover up to 96% of full fine-tuning performance while training only a minimal percentage of parameters, outperforming existing methods that achieve lower performance with a higher percentage of trainable parameters .

Furthermore, the study compares SVFT with other parameter-efficient fine-tuning methods such as LoRA, DoRA, BOFT, and VeRA, showcasing the superior performance of SVFT in terms of recovering full fine-tuning performance with significantly fewer trainable parameters . The results indicate that SVFT offers competitive or superior performance while maintaining a much lower number of parameters, highlighting its effectiveness in achieving efficient fine-tuning .

Overall, the experimental findings in the paper provide compelling evidence to support the hypothesis that SVFT is a promising approach for parameter-efficient fine-tuning, offering a balance between performance and parameter efficiency across various tasks and benchmarks . The results validate the effectiveness of the proposed method in achieving high performance with minimal parameter footprint, contributing significantly to the field of fine-tuning techniques for large-scale foundation models.


What are the contributions of this paper?

The paper "SVFT: Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning with Singular Vectors" introduces several key contributions:

  1. SVFT Approach: The paper proposes the SVFT approach, which differs from existing methods by structuring weight updates based on the specific weight matrix W. SVFT updates W as a sparse combination of outer products of its singular vectors, training only the coefficients of these sparse combinations. This approach allows for fine-grained control over expressivity through the number of coefficients .

  2. Performance Improvement: Extensive experiments conducted on language and vision benchmarks demonstrate that SVFT can recover up to 96% of the full fine-tuning performance while training only 0.006 to 0.25% of parameters. This outperforms existing methods that achieve up to 85% performance using 0.03 to 0.8% of the trainable parameter budget .

  3. Efficiency and Impact: The SVFT method enables parameter-efficient fine-tuning, reducing the number of learnable parameters significantly while maintaining high performance levels. This computational efficiency can have both positive and negative societal impacts, making personalization of foundational models more accessible and cost-effective .


What work can be continued in depth?

To delve deeper into the research, further exploration can be conducted on the importance of singular vectors and singular values during fine-tuning. By reducing the rank of U and V and truncating Σ and M to an effective rank of r, the impact on performance can be studied. The findings suggest that even with a reasonably high rank, there may still be challenges in matching the performance of the full-rank variant, indicating the significance of all singular vectors . Additionally, investigating the performance trade-offs with varying ranks (r) and off-diagonal elements (d) of M can provide insights into the relationship between model complexity and task performance .

Tables

12

Introduction
Background
Emergence of foundation models and their importance
Challenges with fine-tuning large models
Objective
Introduce SVFT: a parameter-efficient method
Aim to improve performance and efficiency
Method
Data Collection
Dataset selection and pre-processing for experiments
Data Preprocessing
Techniques for preparing data for SVFT
SVFT Algorithm
Sparse Outer Product of Singular Vectors
Mathematical formulation of the method
Parameter Efficiency
Comparison with LoRA, DoRA, and VeRA in parameter usage
Structure-Aware Updates
Explanation of how SVFT adapts weight matrices
Rank Perturbations
Theoretical analysis of higher rank improvements
Variants and Applications
SVFTP
Performance in specific tasks (mathematical reasoning, NLP generation)
Sparsity Patterns
Exploration of different sparsity patterns and their impact
Experiments and Results
Performance Evaluation
Comparison with full fine-tuning and other methods
Accuracy and efficiency gains
Task-Specific Analysis
Language and vision tasks: detailed results and analysis
Discussion
Limitations and Future Work
Potential trade-offs and areas for improvement
Real-World Implications
Accessibility and practicality of SVFT for model personalization
Conclusion
Summary of SVFT's contributions
Implications for the future of parameter-efficient fine-tuning in foundation models
Basic info
papers
computation and language
machine learning
artificial intelligence
Advanced features
Insights
What is the performance advantage of SVFT over other methods like LoRA and DoRA?
In which areas does SVFTP demonstrate particularly strong performance compared to other methods?
What is the primary focus of SVFT introduced in the paper?
How does SVFT differ from LoRA and DoRA in terms of parameter efficiency?

SVFT: Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning with Singular Vectors

Vijay Lingam, Atula Tejaswi, Aditya Vavre, Aneesh Shetty, Gautham Krishna Gudur, Joydeep Ghosh, Alex Dimakis, Eunsol Choi, Aleksandar Bojchevski, Sujay Sanghavi·May 30, 2024

Summary

This paper introduces SVFT (Singular Vector Fine-Tuning), a novel parameter-efficient fine-tuning method for large-scale foundation models. Unlike LoRA and DoRA, SVFT updates model weights using sparse outer products of singular vectors, allowing for more fine-grained expressivity with significantly fewer trainable parameters (0.006% to 0.25% compared to 0.03% to 0.8% for other methods). The method outperforms competitors, achieving up to 96% of full fine-tuning performance while maintaining a much smaller footprint. SVFT offers higher accuracy and efficiency by adapting weight matrices with structure-aware updates, theoretically having higher rank perturbations than prior techniques. Experiments on language and vision tasks demonstrate its effectiveness, with variants like SVFTP showing competitive performance with fewer parameters, especially in tasks like mathematical reasoning and natural language generation. The study also explores the impact of different sparsity patterns and compares SVFT to other methods like LoRA, DoRA, and VeRA, highlighting its potential for more accessible and efficient model personalization.
Mind map
Exploration of different sparsity patterns and their impact
Performance in specific tasks (mathematical reasoning, NLP generation)
Theoretical analysis of higher rank improvements
Comparison with LoRA, DoRA, and VeRA in parameter usage
Mathematical formulation of the method
Accessibility and practicality of SVFT for model personalization
Potential trade-offs and areas for improvement
Language and vision tasks: detailed results and analysis
Accuracy and efficiency gains
Comparison with full fine-tuning and other methods
Sparsity Patterns
SVFTP
Rank Perturbations
Parameter Efficiency
Sparse Outer Product of Singular Vectors
Techniques for preparing data for SVFT
Dataset selection and pre-processing for experiments
Aim to improve performance and efficiency
Introduce SVFT: a parameter-efficient method
Challenges with fine-tuning large models
Emergence of foundation models and their importance
Implications for the future of parameter-efficient fine-tuning in foundation models
Summary of SVFT's contributions
Real-World Implications
Limitations and Future Work
Task-Specific Analysis
Performance Evaluation
Variants and Applications
Structure-Aware Updates
SVFT Algorithm
Data Preprocessing
Data Collection
Objective
Background
Conclusion
Discussion
Experiments and Results
Method
Introduction
Outline
Introduction
Background
Emergence of foundation models and their importance
Challenges with fine-tuning large models
Objective
Introduce SVFT: a parameter-efficient method
Aim to improve performance and efficiency
Method
Data Collection
Dataset selection and pre-processing for experiments
Data Preprocessing
Techniques for preparing data for SVFT
SVFT Algorithm
Sparse Outer Product of Singular Vectors
Mathematical formulation of the method
Parameter Efficiency
Comparison with LoRA, DoRA, and VeRA in parameter usage
Structure-Aware Updates
Explanation of how SVFT adapts weight matrices
Rank Perturbations
Theoretical analysis of higher rank improvements
Variants and Applications
SVFTP
Performance in specific tasks (mathematical reasoning, NLP generation)
Sparsity Patterns
Exploration of different sparsity patterns and their impact
Experiments and Results
Performance Evaluation
Comparison with full fine-tuning and other methods
Accuracy and efficiency gains
Task-Specific Analysis
Language and vision tasks: detailed results and analysis
Discussion
Limitations and Future Work
Potential trade-offs and areas for improvement
Real-World Implications
Accessibility and practicality of SVFT for model personalization
Conclusion
Summary of SVFT's contributions
Implications for the future of parameter-efficient fine-tuning in foundation models
Key findings
6

Paper digest

What problem does the paper attempt to solve? Is this a new problem?

The paper "SVFT: Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning with Singular Vectors" aims to address the challenge of parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) in machine learning models, specifically focusing on methods like LoRA and its variants that freeze pre-trained model weights and introduce learnable matrices for efficient adaptation . This paper introduces SVFT as a novel approach that differs fundamentally from existing methods by structuring weight updates based on the specific weight matrix, allowing for fine-grained control over expressivity through the number of coefficients . While the problem of parameter-efficient fine-tuning is not new, the approach proposed in SVFT presents a unique solution by updating weights as a sparse combination of outer products of singular vectors, demonstrating superior performance with significantly fewer trainable parameters compared to existing methods .


What scientific hypothesis does this paper seek to validate?

This paper seeks to validate the scientific hypothesis that the structure imposed on weight updates in fine-tuning methods can significantly impact the performance and efficiency of the adaptation process . The hypothesis revolves around the idea that by updating weights as a sparse combination of outer products of singular vectors, training only the coefficients of these combinations, fine-tuning models can achieve high performance while utilizing a minimal set of new parameters . The study aims to demonstrate that this approach, known as Singular Vectors guided Fine-Tuning (SVFT), can recover up to 96% of the full fine-tuning performance while training only a very small percentage of parameters, outperforming existing methods in terms of efficiency and performance .


What new ideas, methods, or models does the paper propose? What are the characteristics and advantages compared to previous methods?

The paper proposes a novel approach called Singular Vectors guided Fine-Tuning (SVFT) as a parameter-efficient fine-tuning method . SVFT introduces a unique strategy where the structure imposed on the weight update matrix (∆W) is dependent on the specific weight matrix (W) being updated . This method updates W as a sparse combination of outer products of its singular vectors, training only the coefficients of these sparse combinations, allowing for fine-grained control over expressivity through the number of coefficients .

SVFT fundamentally differs from existing methods like LoRA and its variants by updating W based on a sparse combination of its singular vectors, which is a departure from freezing pre-trained model weights and injecting learnable matrices as done in traditional methods . The paper highlights that SVFT can recover up to 96% of full fine-tuning performance while training only 0.006 to 0.25% of parameters, outperforming existing methods that recover up to 85% performance using 0.03 to 0.8% of the trainable parameter budget .

Furthermore, SVFT benefits more from better pre-trained weights compared to other methods like LoRA, showcasing the importance of quality pre-trained weights in the SVFT approach . The paper also discusses the limitations of SVFT, such as increased GPU memory usage compared to some methods like LoRA, but suggests that memory concerns can be addressed through system-level optimizations like mixed-precision weights and exploring quantization techniques in future work .

In summary, SVFT introduces a novel fine-tuning approach that optimizes the weight update process by leveraging the singular vectors of the pre-trained weight matrix, leading to significant performance improvements with minimal additional parameters, making it a promising method for efficient model adaptation .

Characteristics and Advantages of SVFT Compared to Previous Methods:

Characteristics of SVFT:

  • Structure-Dependent Weight Update: SVFT updates the weight matrix W as a sparse combination of outer products of its singular vectors, training only the coefficients of these sparse combinations, allowing for fine-grained control over expressivity through the number of coefficients .
  • Parameter Efficiency: SVFT significantly reduces the number of learnable parameters while maintaining performance, with only 0.006 to 0.25% of parameters trained, outperforming existing methods that require 0.03 to 0.8% of the trainable parameter budget .
  • Quality Pre-Trained Weights Impact: SVFT benefits more from better pre-trained weights compared to other methods like LoRA, showcasing the importance of quality pre-trained weights in the SVFT approach .
  • Performance Recovery: SVFT can recover up to 96% of full fine-tuning performance while training a minimal percentage of parameters, demonstrating its effectiveness in model adaptation .

Advantages of SVFT Over Previous Methods:

  • Improved Performance: SVFT outperforms existing methods like LoRA by recovering up to 96% of full fine-tuning performance, surpassing the performance of methods like DoRA that recover 86% with more parameters .
  • Efficient Parameterization: SVFT offers a more parameter-efficient fine-tuning approach compared to methods like LoRA, achieving superior performance with significantly fewer trainable parameters .
  • Flexibility and Control: SVFT provides fine-grained control over expressivity through the number of coefficients trained, allowing for tailored adjustments in model adaptation .
  • Memory Optimization: While SVFT incurs some additional GPU memory usage compared to certain methods, memory concerns can be addressed through system-level optimizations like mixed-precision weights and exploring quantization techniques in future work .

In summary, SVFT stands out for its innovative structure-dependent weight update approach, superior parameter efficiency, performance recovery capabilities, and the flexibility it offers in model adaptation, making it a promising method for efficient fine-tuning with notable advantages over existing techniques .


Do any related researches exist? Who are the noteworthy researchers on this topic in this field?What is the key to the solution mentioned in the paper?

Several related research works exist in the field of parameter-efficient fine-tuning with singular vectors. Noteworthy researchers in this area include Karl Moritz Hermann, Tomáš Koˇciský, Edward Grefenstette, Neil Houlsby, Andrei Giurgiu, Edward J Hu, Yelong Shen, and many others . The key solution proposed in the paper "SVFT: Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning with Singular Vectors" is the Singular Vectors guided Fine-Tuning (SVFT) method. This method updates the pre-trained weight matrix by applying a structured, learned weight update that depends on the specific weight matrix W. It involves training only the coefficients (scales) of sparse combinations of outer products of singular vectors, allowing fine-grained control over expressivity through the number of coefficients .


How were the experiments in the paper designed?

The experiments in the paper were designed to evaluate the performance of the proposed method, SVFT, for parameter-efficient fine-tuning of pre-trained models . The experiments involved comparing SVFT with other existing methods such as LoRA, DoRA, BOFT, and VeRA . These comparisons were conducted across various tasks including natural language generation (NLG) tasks like GSM-8K and MATH, as well as commonsense reasoning benchmarks and natural language understanding (NLU) tasks . Additionally, the experiments extended to vision tasks encompassing benchmarks like CIFAR-100, Food101, RESISC45, and Flowers102 . The performance of SVFT was assessed based on accuracy metrics and the number of trainable parameters used, highlighting its superior or competitive performance with significantly fewer parameters compared to other methods .


What is the dataset used for quantitative evaluation? Is the code open source?

The dataset used for quantitative evaluation includes various benchmarks for both language and vision tasks. For natural language generation tasks, the evaluation is conducted on benchmarks such as GSM-8K, MATH, and MetaMathQA-40K, along with 8 commonsense reasoning benchmarks like BoolQ, PIQA, and WinoGrande . Additionally, for natural language understanding tasks, the evaluation is performed on the General Language Understanding Evaluation (GLUE) benchmark . In terms of vision tasks, the experiments cover benchmarks like CIFAR-100, Food101, RESISC45, and Flowers102 .

Regarding the code, the provided context does not mention whether the code used for the evaluation is open source or not. To determine the availability of the code, it would be necessary to refer to the specific publication or research paper associated with the dataset and evaluation mentioned in the context .


Do the experiments and results in the paper provide good support for the scientific hypotheses that need to be verified? Please analyze.

The experiments and results presented in the paper provide strong support for the scientific hypotheses that needed verification. The study introduces SVFT, a novel approach for parameter-efficient fine-tuning that differs fundamentally from existing methods by updating weights as a sparse combination of outer products of singular vectors, training only the coefficients of these combinations . The experiments conducted on language and vision benchmarks demonstrate that SVFT can recover up to 96% of full fine-tuning performance while training only a minimal percentage of parameters, outperforming existing methods that achieve lower performance with a higher percentage of trainable parameters .

Furthermore, the study compares SVFT with other parameter-efficient fine-tuning methods such as LoRA, DoRA, BOFT, and VeRA, showcasing the superior performance of SVFT in terms of recovering full fine-tuning performance with significantly fewer trainable parameters . The results indicate that SVFT offers competitive or superior performance while maintaining a much lower number of parameters, highlighting its effectiveness in achieving efficient fine-tuning .

Overall, the experimental findings in the paper provide compelling evidence to support the hypothesis that SVFT is a promising approach for parameter-efficient fine-tuning, offering a balance between performance and parameter efficiency across various tasks and benchmarks . The results validate the effectiveness of the proposed method in achieving high performance with minimal parameter footprint, contributing significantly to the field of fine-tuning techniques for large-scale foundation models.


What are the contributions of this paper?

The paper "SVFT: Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning with Singular Vectors" introduces several key contributions:

  1. SVFT Approach: The paper proposes the SVFT approach, which differs from existing methods by structuring weight updates based on the specific weight matrix W. SVFT updates W as a sparse combination of outer products of its singular vectors, training only the coefficients of these sparse combinations. This approach allows for fine-grained control over expressivity through the number of coefficients .

  2. Performance Improvement: Extensive experiments conducted on language and vision benchmarks demonstrate that SVFT can recover up to 96% of the full fine-tuning performance while training only 0.006 to 0.25% of parameters. This outperforms existing methods that achieve up to 85% performance using 0.03 to 0.8% of the trainable parameter budget .

  3. Efficiency and Impact: The SVFT method enables parameter-efficient fine-tuning, reducing the number of learnable parameters significantly while maintaining high performance levels. This computational efficiency can have both positive and negative societal impacts, making personalization of foundational models more accessible and cost-effective .


What work can be continued in depth?

To delve deeper into the research, further exploration can be conducted on the importance of singular vectors and singular values during fine-tuning. By reducing the rank of U and V and truncating Σ and M to an effective rank of r, the impact on performance can be studied. The findings suggest that even with a reasonably high rank, there may still be challenges in matching the performance of the full-rank variant, indicating the significance of all singular vectors . Additionally, investigating the performance trade-offs with varying ranks (r) and off-diagonal elements (d) of M can provide insights into the relationship between model complexity and task performance .

Tables
12
Scan the QR code to ask more questions about the paper
© 2025 Powerdrill. All rights reserved.