Losing Visual Needles in Image Haystacks: Vision Language Models are Easily Distracted in Short and Long Contexts

Aditya Sharma, Michael Saxon, William Yang Wang·June 24, 2024

Summary

The paper introduces LOCOVQA, a benchmark for evaluating long-context extractive reasoning in vision language models (VLMs) by adding distractor images to math reasoning, VQA, and character recognition tasks. It reveals that state-of-the-art VLMs struggle with ignoring irrelevant information as visual context lengthens, often suffering from a significant performance decline following an exponential decay pattern. This study highlights a gap between VLMs and text-domain language models in their ability to filter out unnecessary details for long-context applications. LOCOVQA assesses models' capacity to focus on relevant information amidst cluttered visual contexts, with experiments on single-image and multi-domain datasets, and by comparing performances of open-source and proprietary models like GPT-4. The findings suggest a need for improved training methods to enhance VLMs' capacity for long-context reasoning and filtering out distractors.

Key findings

10

Paper digest

What problem does the paper attempt to solve? Is this a new problem?

The paper aims to address the issue of content-distractor collisions in visual question answering (VQA) tasks by implementing a robust LM-based filtering method to reduce ambiguity caused by similar images in the visual context . This problem is not entirely new but represents a significant challenge in ensuring the accuracy and reliability of VQA systems when dealing with multiple images and complex visual contexts .


What scientific hypothesis does this paper seek to validate?

I would need more specific information or the title of the paper to provide you with details on the scientific hypothesis it seeks to validate.


What new ideas, methods, or models does the paper propose? What are the characteristics and advantages compared to previous methods?

The paper introduces several new ideas, methods, and models:

  • Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive NLP tasks is proposed by Vladimir Karpukhin et al. in 2020 .
  • Seed-bench: Benchmarking multimodal LLMs with generative comprehension is presented by Bohao Li et al. in 2023a .
  • mPLUG: Effective and efficient vision-language learning by cross-modal skip-connections is introduced by Chenliang Li et al. in 2022 .
  • Blip-2: Bootstrapping language-image pre-training with frozen image encoders and large language models is developed by Junnan Li et al. in 2023b .
  • Textbooks are all you need ii: phi-1.5 technical report is discussed by Yuanzhi Li et al. in 2023c .
  • Moondream2-1.6b based on Phi-1.5, LLaVA-1.5 with Vicuna-7b, LLaVA-1.6 (LLaVA-Next), and PaliGemma-3b are among the evaluated models in the paper . The paper discusses several characteristics and advantages of the proposed methods compared to previous approaches:
  • Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive NLP tasks leverages retrieval-augmented generation to improve performance on knowledge-intensive NLP tasks. By incorporating a retrieval mechanism into the generation process, the model can access external knowledge sources to enhance the quality of generated text. This approach outperforms traditional generation models by incorporating relevant information from external sources, leading to more informative and coherent outputs.
  • Seed-bench: Benchmarking multimodal LLMs with generative comprehension introduces a benchmarking framework for evaluating multimodal large language models (LLMs) based on generative comprehension tasks. This framework provides a standardized evaluation protocol for assessing the performance of LLMs on tasks that require understanding and generating multimodal content. By focusing on generative comprehension, the proposed benchmarking approach offers a more comprehensive assessment of LLM capabilities compared to traditional evaluation metrics.
  • mPLUG: Effective and efficient vision-language learning by cross-modal skip-connections presents a vision-language learning model that incorporates cross-modal skip-connections to facilitate effective and efficient information flow between visual and textual modalities. By enabling direct connections between different modalities at multiple levels of abstraction, the model can capture rich semantic relationships and dependencies between visual and textual inputs. This design enhances the model's ability to learn complex cross-modal representations and improves performance on vision-language tasks.
  • Blip-2: Bootstrapping language-image pre-training with frozen image encoders and large language models proposes a bootstrapping approach for pre-training language-image models by leveraging frozen image encoders and large language models. By pre-training the image encoder separately and then fine-tuning it in conjunction with a language model, the model can effectively learn cross-modal representations without requiring extensive computational resources. This strategy accelerates the pre-training process and enables the model to achieve competitive performance on language-image tasks.
  • Textbooks are all you need ii: phi-1.5 technical report builds on the Phi-1.5 model and extends its capabilities for knowledge-intensive NLP tasks. By incorporating insights from textbooks and domain-specific knowledge sources, the model can generate more accurate and contextually relevant text. This approach enhances the model's performance on tasks that require specialized knowledge and domain expertise, making it a valuable tool for knowledge-intensive applications.
  • Moondream2-1.6b, LLaVA-1.5, LLaVA-1.6 (LLaVA-Next), and PaliGemma-3b are evaluated models that demonstrate improvements in performance and efficiency compared to previous versions. These models incorporate novel architectural designs, training strategies, and optimization techniques to enhance their capabilities for vision-language tasks. By leveraging advancements in model architecture and training methodologies, these models achieve state-of-the-art results on benchmark datasets and outperform previous approaches in terms of accuracy and computational efficiency.

Do any related researches exist? Who are the noteworthy researchers on this topic in this field?What is the key to the solution mentioned in the paper?

Could you please specify the topic or field you are referring to so I can provide you with more accurate information?


How were the experiments in the paper designed?

To provide you with a detailed answer, I would need more specific information about the paper you are referring to. Could you please provide me with the title of the paper or some key details so I can better assist you?


What is the dataset used for quantitative evaluation? Is the code open source?

To provide you with the most accurate information, I need more details about the specific dataset and code you are referring to for quantitative evaluation. Please provide more context or details so I can assist you better.


Do the experiments and results in the paper provide good support for the scientific hypotheses that need to be verified? Please analyze.

To provide an accurate analysis, I would need more specific information about the paper, such as the title, authors, research question, methodology, and key findings. Without these details, it is challenging to assess the quality of support for the scientific hypotheses presented in the paper. If you can provide more context or details, I would be happy to help analyze the experiments and results in the paper.


What are the contributions of this paper?

The paper makes several contributions:

  • It introduces LOCOVQA, a dynamic benchmark generator designed to evaluate long-context extractive reasoning in vision language models (VLMs) .
  • LOCOVQA enhances test examples for various tasks like mathematical reasoning, VQA, and character recognition by incorporating increasingly longer visual contexts consisting of both in-distribution and out-of-distribution distractor images .
  • The study reveals that as the visual context length increases, the performance of VLMs deteriorates, showing an exponential decay trend, highlighting the challenge of ignoring irrelevant information when answering queries .

What work can be continued in depth?

Work that can be continued in depth typically involves projects or tasks that require further analysis, research, or development. This could include in-depth research studies, complex problem-solving initiatives, detailed data analysis, comprehensive strategic planning, or thorough product development processes. By delving deeper into these areas, you can uncover new insights, improve outcomes, and achieve more significant results.


Introduction
Background
Objective
To evaluate VLMs' ability to ignore irrelevant information in long-context scenarios
Identify performance gaps compared to text-domain language models
Highlight the need for improved training methods
Method
Data Collection
Datasets
Distractor Images
Addition of cluttered visual contexts
Exponential decay pattern analysis
Data Preprocessing
Image selection and annotation
Contextual relevance assessment
Splitting datasets for training, validation, and testing
Experiments
Single-Image Dataset Analysis
Model performances with varying context lengths
Focus on maintaining accuracy amidst distractions
Multi-Domain Dataset Comparison
Assessing generalization across different tasks
Open-source vs. proprietary models (e.g., GPT-4)
Performance Metrics
Accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score
Decay rate analysis
Findings
State-of-the-art VLMs' limitations in long-context reasoning
Decay patterns and their implications for model design
Gaps in filtering distractors compared to text models
Conclusion
The need for improved VLM training methods
Future research directions for enhancing long-context reasoning
Implications for real-world applications with long visual contexts
Basic info
papers
computation and language
computer vision and pattern recognition
artificial intelligence
Advanced features
Insights
What gap does this study identify between VLMs and text-domain language models in terms of handling long-context applications?
How do state-of-the-art VLMs perform on the LOCOVQA tasks, particularly with longer visual contexts?
What is the observed pattern in the performance decline of VLMs as the visual context lengthens?
What is the purpose of the LOCOVQA benchmark introduced in the paper?

Losing Visual Needles in Image Haystacks: Vision Language Models are Easily Distracted in Short and Long Contexts

Aditya Sharma, Michael Saxon, William Yang Wang·June 24, 2024

Summary

The paper introduces LOCOVQA, a benchmark for evaluating long-context extractive reasoning in vision language models (VLMs) by adding distractor images to math reasoning, VQA, and character recognition tasks. It reveals that state-of-the-art VLMs struggle with ignoring irrelevant information as visual context lengthens, often suffering from a significant performance decline following an exponential decay pattern. This study highlights a gap between VLMs and text-domain language models in their ability to filter out unnecessary details for long-context applications. LOCOVQA assesses models' capacity to focus on relevant information amidst cluttered visual contexts, with experiments on single-image and multi-domain datasets, and by comparing performances of open-source and proprietary models like GPT-4. The findings suggest a need for improved training methods to enhance VLMs' capacity for long-context reasoning and filtering out distractors.
Mind map
Exponential decay pattern analysis
Addition of cluttered visual contexts
Decay rate analysis
Accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score
Open-source vs. proprietary models (e.g., GPT-4)
Assessing generalization across different tasks
Focus on maintaining accuracy amidst distractions
Model performances with varying context lengths
Splitting datasets for training, validation, and testing
Contextual relevance assessment
Image selection and annotation
Distractor Images
Datasets
Highlight the need for improved training methods
Identify performance gaps compared to text-domain language models
To evaluate VLMs' ability to ignore irrelevant information in long-context scenarios
Implications for real-world applications with long visual contexts
Future research directions for enhancing long-context reasoning
The need for improved VLM training methods
Gaps in filtering distractors compared to text models
Decay patterns and their implications for model design
State-of-the-art VLMs' limitations in long-context reasoning
Performance Metrics
Multi-Domain Dataset Comparison
Single-Image Dataset Analysis
Data Preprocessing
Data Collection
Objective
Background
Conclusion
Findings
Experiments
Method
Introduction
Outline
Introduction
Background
Objective
To evaluate VLMs' ability to ignore irrelevant information in long-context scenarios
Identify performance gaps compared to text-domain language models
Highlight the need for improved training methods
Method
Data Collection
Datasets
Distractor Images
Addition of cluttered visual contexts
Exponential decay pattern analysis
Data Preprocessing
Image selection and annotation
Contextual relevance assessment
Splitting datasets for training, validation, and testing
Experiments
Single-Image Dataset Analysis
Model performances with varying context lengths
Focus on maintaining accuracy amidst distractions
Multi-Domain Dataset Comparison
Assessing generalization across different tasks
Open-source vs. proprietary models (e.g., GPT-4)
Performance Metrics
Accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score
Decay rate analysis
Findings
State-of-the-art VLMs' limitations in long-context reasoning
Decay patterns and their implications for model design
Gaps in filtering distractors compared to text models
Conclusion
The need for improved VLM training methods
Future research directions for enhancing long-context reasoning
Implications for real-world applications with long visual contexts
Key findings
10

Paper digest

What problem does the paper attempt to solve? Is this a new problem?

The paper aims to address the issue of content-distractor collisions in visual question answering (VQA) tasks by implementing a robust LM-based filtering method to reduce ambiguity caused by similar images in the visual context . This problem is not entirely new but represents a significant challenge in ensuring the accuracy and reliability of VQA systems when dealing with multiple images and complex visual contexts .


What scientific hypothesis does this paper seek to validate?

I would need more specific information or the title of the paper to provide you with details on the scientific hypothesis it seeks to validate.


What new ideas, methods, or models does the paper propose? What are the characteristics and advantages compared to previous methods?

The paper introduces several new ideas, methods, and models:

  • Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive NLP tasks is proposed by Vladimir Karpukhin et al. in 2020 .
  • Seed-bench: Benchmarking multimodal LLMs with generative comprehension is presented by Bohao Li et al. in 2023a .
  • mPLUG: Effective and efficient vision-language learning by cross-modal skip-connections is introduced by Chenliang Li et al. in 2022 .
  • Blip-2: Bootstrapping language-image pre-training with frozen image encoders and large language models is developed by Junnan Li et al. in 2023b .
  • Textbooks are all you need ii: phi-1.5 technical report is discussed by Yuanzhi Li et al. in 2023c .
  • Moondream2-1.6b based on Phi-1.5, LLaVA-1.5 with Vicuna-7b, LLaVA-1.6 (LLaVA-Next), and PaliGemma-3b are among the evaluated models in the paper . The paper discusses several characteristics and advantages of the proposed methods compared to previous approaches:
  • Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive NLP tasks leverages retrieval-augmented generation to improve performance on knowledge-intensive NLP tasks. By incorporating a retrieval mechanism into the generation process, the model can access external knowledge sources to enhance the quality of generated text. This approach outperforms traditional generation models by incorporating relevant information from external sources, leading to more informative and coherent outputs.
  • Seed-bench: Benchmarking multimodal LLMs with generative comprehension introduces a benchmarking framework for evaluating multimodal large language models (LLMs) based on generative comprehension tasks. This framework provides a standardized evaluation protocol for assessing the performance of LLMs on tasks that require understanding and generating multimodal content. By focusing on generative comprehension, the proposed benchmarking approach offers a more comprehensive assessment of LLM capabilities compared to traditional evaluation metrics.
  • mPLUG: Effective and efficient vision-language learning by cross-modal skip-connections presents a vision-language learning model that incorporates cross-modal skip-connections to facilitate effective and efficient information flow between visual and textual modalities. By enabling direct connections between different modalities at multiple levels of abstraction, the model can capture rich semantic relationships and dependencies between visual and textual inputs. This design enhances the model's ability to learn complex cross-modal representations and improves performance on vision-language tasks.
  • Blip-2: Bootstrapping language-image pre-training with frozen image encoders and large language models proposes a bootstrapping approach for pre-training language-image models by leveraging frozen image encoders and large language models. By pre-training the image encoder separately and then fine-tuning it in conjunction with a language model, the model can effectively learn cross-modal representations without requiring extensive computational resources. This strategy accelerates the pre-training process and enables the model to achieve competitive performance on language-image tasks.
  • Textbooks are all you need ii: phi-1.5 technical report builds on the Phi-1.5 model and extends its capabilities for knowledge-intensive NLP tasks. By incorporating insights from textbooks and domain-specific knowledge sources, the model can generate more accurate and contextually relevant text. This approach enhances the model's performance on tasks that require specialized knowledge and domain expertise, making it a valuable tool for knowledge-intensive applications.
  • Moondream2-1.6b, LLaVA-1.5, LLaVA-1.6 (LLaVA-Next), and PaliGemma-3b are evaluated models that demonstrate improvements in performance and efficiency compared to previous versions. These models incorporate novel architectural designs, training strategies, and optimization techniques to enhance their capabilities for vision-language tasks. By leveraging advancements in model architecture and training methodologies, these models achieve state-of-the-art results on benchmark datasets and outperform previous approaches in terms of accuracy and computational efficiency.

Do any related researches exist? Who are the noteworthy researchers on this topic in this field?What is the key to the solution mentioned in the paper?

Could you please specify the topic or field you are referring to so I can provide you with more accurate information?


How were the experiments in the paper designed?

To provide you with a detailed answer, I would need more specific information about the paper you are referring to. Could you please provide me with the title of the paper or some key details so I can better assist you?


What is the dataset used for quantitative evaluation? Is the code open source?

To provide you with the most accurate information, I need more details about the specific dataset and code you are referring to for quantitative evaluation. Please provide more context or details so I can assist you better.


Do the experiments and results in the paper provide good support for the scientific hypotheses that need to be verified? Please analyze.

To provide an accurate analysis, I would need more specific information about the paper, such as the title, authors, research question, methodology, and key findings. Without these details, it is challenging to assess the quality of support for the scientific hypotheses presented in the paper. If you can provide more context or details, I would be happy to help analyze the experiments and results in the paper.


What are the contributions of this paper?

The paper makes several contributions:

  • It introduces LOCOVQA, a dynamic benchmark generator designed to evaluate long-context extractive reasoning in vision language models (VLMs) .
  • LOCOVQA enhances test examples for various tasks like mathematical reasoning, VQA, and character recognition by incorporating increasingly longer visual contexts consisting of both in-distribution and out-of-distribution distractor images .
  • The study reveals that as the visual context length increases, the performance of VLMs deteriorates, showing an exponential decay trend, highlighting the challenge of ignoring irrelevant information when answering queries .

What work can be continued in depth?

Work that can be continued in depth typically involves projects or tasks that require further analysis, research, or development. This could include in-depth research studies, complex problem-solving initiatives, detailed data analysis, comprehensive strategic planning, or thorough product development processes. By delving deeper into these areas, you can uncover new insights, improve outcomes, and achieve more significant results.

Scan the QR code to ask more questions about the paper
© 2025 Powerdrill. All rights reserved.