Logic-Based Explainability: Past, Present & Future

Joao Marques-Silva·June 04, 2024

Summary

This paper surveys the recent advancements in logic-based Explainable AI (XAI) to address the lack of transparency in high-risk AI/ML models. It emphasizes the need for rigorous methods to foster trust, especially in safety-critical domains. Logic-based XAI, drawing from symbolic AI and formal explainability, aims to provide certified decisions by leveraging propositional and first-order logic, SAT, SMT, and MILP. The paper covers topics such as formal foundations, progress in classification and regression problems, feature attribution and selection, and the use of Shapley values. It discusses challenges like computational intractability and the unification of different XAI approaches, while debunking misconceptions about non-rigorous methods. Future research directions include enhancing tractability for larger models, adversarial robustness, and the integration of background knowledge. The paper concludes by highlighting the importance of rigorous XAI in ensuring the reliability and trustworthiness of AI systems.

Paper digest

What problem does the paper attempt to solve? Is this a new problem?

The paper aims to address the issue of lack of rigor in Explainable AI (XAI) and the consequent lack of trust in high-risk or safety-critical domains by providing human decision-makers with understandable explanations for the predictions made by Machine Learning (ML) models . This problem is not new, as the paper highlights that despite the strategic importance of XAI, most existing work in this field lacks rigor, leading to a lack of trust instead of building the much-needed trust in AI systems .


What scientific hypothesis does this paper seek to validate?

This paper aims to validate the scientific hypothesis related to delivering trustworthy AI through formal XAI . The focus is on ensuring that interpretable ML models must be explained, emphasizing the importance of explainability in AI models . The research delves into provably precise, succinct, and efficient explanations for decision trees , highlighting the significance of providing accurate and concise explanations for AI/ML models.


What new ideas, methods, or models does the paper propose? What are the characteristics and advantages compared to previous methods?

The paper on Logic-Based Explainability proposes several new ideas, methods, and models in the field of eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) . Some of the key contributions include:

  1. Logic-Based XAI Overview: The paper provides an overview of the emergence of logic-based XAI, highlighting its progress, main results, and remaining limitations .

  2. Ongoing Research Directions: It lists several ongoing promising research directions that aim to address the remaining challenges of logic-based XAI .

  3. Uncovering Misconceptions: The paper emphasizes how logic-based XAI has helped uncover several misconceptions of non-rigorous XAI, contributing to a more rigorous and reliable approach to explainability in AI models .

  4. Formalization of Feature Attribution: Towards rigorous interpretations, the paper formalizes feature attribution, which is crucial for understanding the decisions made by AI models .

  5. Tractability of Explanations: It discusses the tractability of explanations for classifier decisions, focusing on delivering precise, succinct, and efficient explanations for decision-making processes .

  6. Trustworthy AI: The paper emphasizes the importance of delivering trustworthy AI through formal XAI methods, ensuring transparency and reliability in AI decision-making processes .

  7. Interpretable ML Models: It argues that interpretable ML models must be explained, highlighting the necessity of clear and understandable explanations in the context of machine learning .

  8. Eliminating Misconceptions: The paper aims to disprove XAI myths with formal methods, providing initial results that challenge common misconceptions in the field of explainable AI .

These contributions collectively advance the field of XAI by promoting transparency, trustworthiness, and rigorous methods for explaining the decisions made by AI models, ultimately enhancing the interpretability and reliability of AI systems . The paper on Logic-Based Explainability introduces novel concepts and methods that offer distinct characteristics and advantages compared to previous approaches in eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) . Here are some key points highlighting these characteristics and advantages:

  1. Distance-Restricted Explanations: The paper proposes the concept of distance-restricted explanations, which trade off global validity for localized explanations that can be computed efficiently using existing tools. This approach significantly improves the scalability of computing explanations, especially for complex neural network models .

  2. Feature Attribution Enhancement: It addresses the limitations of previous methods like SHAP by offering alternatives that rigorously compute feature importance scores. These new methods, such as AXps and CXps, provide more accurate and reliable measures of feature importance, enhancing the interpretability of machine learning models .

  3. Certified Explainability: The paper introduces the idea of certifying computed explanations in XAI, ensuring the reliability and trustworthiness of the explanations provided. This certification process aims to validate the correctness of explanations, particularly for monotonic classifiers, paving the way for further verification of various explainability queries .

  4. Scalability Improvement: By addressing the computational complexity of computing explanations for widely used ML models like neural networks, the paper aims to enhance the scalability of logic-based XAI. This improvement is crucial for explaining large-scale ML models efficiently and effectively .

  5. Surrogate Models and Rigorous Attribution: The paper explores the conditions for using surrogate models to compute explanations for complex ML models. It emphasizes the need for rigorous feature attribution in distance-restricted explanations, ensuring that the computed explanations align closely with the original complex model, thus enhancing the interpretability of the explanations provided .

These characteristics and advancements in logic-based explainability contribute to a more robust, scalable, and trustworthy approach to XAI, offering improved interpretability and reliability in explaining the decisions made by machine learning models.


Do any related researches exist? Who are the noteworthy researchers on this topic in this field?What is the key to the solution mentioned in the paper?

Several related researches exist in the field of logic-based explainability. Noteworthy researchers in this field include J. Marques-Silva, A. Ignatiev, N. Narodytska, M. Cooper, X. Huang, among others . The key to the solution mentioned in the paper involves the emergence of logic-based XAI, its progress, main results, remaining limitations, ongoing promising research directions, and uncovering misconceptions of non-rigorous XAI .


How were the experiments in the paper designed?

The experiments in the paper were designed to focus on logic-based explainability in machine learning, particularly in the context of computing abductive explanations for widely used ML models like neural networks (NNs) . The experiments aimed to address the issue of scalability in logic-based eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) by exploring the computational complexity of computing abductive explanations for ML models . The paper highlighted the importance of delivering trustworthy AI through formal XAI methods, emphasizing the necessity for interpretable ML models to be explained . Additionally, the experiments aimed to provide formal explanations for classifier decisions, ensuring that these explanations can be reasoned about, especially in high-risk and safety-critical domains where the rigor of explanations is crucial . The experiments also delved into the computation of SHAP scores for machine learning models, which play a significant role in interpreting and understanding model predictions .


What is the dataset used for quantitative evaluation? Is the code open source?

The dataset used for quantitative evaluation in the context of logic-based explainability is not explicitly mentioned in the provided content. However, the code for the research on explainability in artificial intelligence (AI) may be open source, as it is common practice in the field to share code and research findings for transparency and reproducibility . If you are looking for a specific dataset used for quantitative evaluation, further details or references would be needed to provide a more precise answer.


Do the experiments and results in the paper provide good support for the scientific hypotheses that need to be verified? Please analyze.

The experiments and results presented in the paper provide substantial support for the scientific hypotheses that require verification. The paper outlines the progress, main outcomes, and ongoing research directions in logic-based eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) . It discusses the limitations of this approach and highlights how logic-based XAI has helped dispel misconceptions in non-rigorous XAI . The involvement of various colleagues and the acknowledgment of funding sources further enhance the credibility of the research . The references cited in the paper also indicate a rigorous approach to interpretation and consistency restoration in dynamic CSPs, contributing to the scientific validity of the hypotheses .


What are the contributions of this paper?

The paper on Logic-Based Explainability provides the following contributions:

  • Overview of the emergence of logic-based eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), detailing its progress, main results, and remaining limitations .
  • Discussion of ongoing promising research directions to address challenges in logic-based XAI .
  • Uncovering misconceptions of non-rigorous XAI through the lens of logic-based XAI .
  • Funding acknowledgments and input from various colleagues in the field .

What work can be continued in depth?

Continuing the work in depth on logic-based explainability involves several promising research directions and ongoing topics of interest. One key area is the unification of two main approaches for Explainable AI (XAI): explainability by feature attribution and explainability by feature selection . Additionally, there is a focus on studying the conditions for using surrogate models to compute explanations for complex ML models, as well as exploring the measure of rigorous feature attribution, especially in cases of distance-restricted explanations . Furthermore, ongoing research aims to address challenges related to the verification of computed explanations and the development of tools to answer various explainability queries .


Introduction
Background
Lack of Transparency: The growing reliance on AI/ML in high-risk domains
Trust Crisis: Importance of transparency for safety and accountability
Objective
To survey recent advancements in logic-based XAI
To promote rigorous methods for fostering trust in AI systems
Method
Formal Foundations
Propositional and First-Order Logic
SAT, SMT, and MILP: Decision procedures for certifiable explanations
Applications
Classification and Regression
State-of-the-art techniques using logic-based approaches
Performance evaluation and benchmarking
Feature Attribution and Selection
Logic-driven feature importance analysis
Challenges and trade-offs in feature selection
Shapley Values in Logic-based XAI
Integration of Shapley values for explanation generation
Challenges and Debunking Misconceptions
Computational Intractability: Limitations and approaches to overcome
Unification of XAI methods: The need for harmonization
Adversarial Robustness and Integration of Background Knowledge
Adversarial resilience in logic-based explanations
Incorporating domain knowledge for enhanced explainability
Future Research Directions
Enhancing tractability for large-scale models
Scalability and efficiency improvements
Integration with other XAI techniques and explainers
Conclusion
The significance of rigorous XAI for AI reliability and trustworthiness
Call to action for further research and development in logic-based explainable AI.
Basic info
papers
artificial intelligence
Advanced features
Insights
What are some of the future research directions mentioned in the paper?
What problem does the paper address in the field of AI/ML?
What are the main approaches used in logic-based Explainable AI (XAI) mentioned in the paper?
What is the primary focus of the paper discussed?

Logic-Based Explainability: Past, Present & Future

Joao Marques-Silva·June 04, 2024

Summary

This paper surveys the recent advancements in logic-based Explainable AI (XAI) to address the lack of transparency in high-risk AI/ML models. It emphasizes the need for rigorous methods to foster trust, especially in safety-critical domains. Logic-based XAI, drawing from symbolic AI and formal explainability, aims to provide certified decisions by leveraging propositional and first-order logic, SAT, SMT, and MILP. The paper covers topics such as formal foundations, progress in classification and regression problems, feature attribution and selection, and the use of Shapley values. It discusses challenges like computational intractability and the unification of different XAI approaches, while debunking misconceptions about non-rigorous methods. Future research directions include enhancing tractability for larger models, adversarial robustness, and the integration of background knowledge. The paper concludes by highlighting the importance of rigorous XAI in ensuring the reliability and trustworthiness of AI systems.
Mind map
Integration of Shapley values for explanation generation
Challenges and trade-offs in feature selection
Logic-driven feature importance analysis
Performance evaluation and benchmarking
State-of-the-art techniques using logic-based approaches
Integration with other XAI techniques and explainers
Scalability and efficiency improvements
Enhancing tractability for large-scale models
Incorporating domain knowledge for enhanced explainability
Adversarial resilience in logic-based explanations
Unification of XAI methods: The need for harmonization
Computational Intractability: Limitations and approaches to overcome
Shapley Values in Logic-based XAI
Feature Attribution and Selection
Classification and Regression
SAT, SMT, and MILP: Decision procedures for certifiable explanations
Propositional and First-Order Logic
To promote rigorous methods for fostering trust in AI systems
To survey recent advancements in logic-based XAI
Trust Crisis: Importance of transparency for safety and accountability
Lack of Transparency: The growing reliance on AI/ML in high-risk domains
Call to action for further research and development in logic-based explainable AI.
The significance of rigorous XAI for AI reliability and trustworthiness
Future Research Directions
Adversarial Robustness and Integration of Background Knowledge
Challenges and Debunking Misconceptions
Applications
Formal Foundations
Objective
Background
Conclusion
Method
Introduction
Outline
Introduction
Background
Lack of Transparency: The growing reliance on AI/ML in high-risk domains
Trust Crisis: Importance of transparency for safety and accountability
Objective
To survey recent advancements in logic-based XAI
To promote rigorous methods for fostering trust in AI systems
Method
Formal Foundations
Propositional and First-Order Logic
SAT, SMT, and MILP: Decision procedures for certifiable explanations
Applications
Classification and Regression
State-of-the-art techniques using logic-based approaches
Performance evaluation and benchmarking
Feature Attribution and Selection
Logic-driven feature importance analysis
Challenges and trade-offs in feature selection
Shapley Values in Logic-based XAI
Integration of Shapley values for explanation generation
Challenges and Debunking Misconceptions
Computational Intractability: Limitations and approaches to overcome
Unification of XAI methods: The need for harmonization
Adversarial Robustness and Integration of Background Knowledge
Adversarial resilience in logic-based explanations
Incorporating domain knowledge for enhanced explainability
Future Research Directions
Enhancing tractability for large-scale models
Scalability and efficiency improvements
Integration with other XAI techniques and explainers
Conclusion
The significance of rigorous XAI for AI reliability and trustworthiness
Call to action for further research and development in logic-based explainable AI.

Paper digest

What problem does the paper attempt to solve? Is this a new problem?

The paper aims to address the issue of lack of rigor in Explainable AI (XAI) and the consequent lack of trust in high-risk or safety-critical domains by providing human decision-makers with understandable explanations for the predictions made by Machine Learning (ML) models . This problem is not new, as the paper highlights that despite the strategic importance of XAI, most existing work in this field lacks rigor, leading to a lack of trust instead of building the much-needed trust in AI systems .


What scientific hypothesis does this paper seek to validate?

This paper aims to validate the scientific hypothesis related to delivering trustworthy AI through formal XAI . The focus is on ensuring that interpretable ML models must be explained, emphasizing the importance of explainability in AI models . The research delves into provably precise, succinct, and efficient explanations for decision trees , highlighting the significance of providing accurate and concise explanations for AI/ML models.


What new ideas, methods, or models does the paper propose? What are the characteristics and advantages compared to previous methods?

The paper on Logic-Based Explainability proposes several new ideas, methods, and models in the field of eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) . Some of the key contributions include:

  1. Logic-Based XAI Overview: The paper provides an overview of the emergence of logic-based XAI, highlighting its progress, main results, and remaining limitations .

  2. Ongoing Research Directions: It lists several ongoing promising research directions that aim to address the remaining challenges of logic-based XAI .

  3. Uncovering Misconceptions: The paper emphasizes how logic-based XAI has helped uncover several misconceptions of non-rigorous XAI, contributing to a more rigorous and reliable approach to explainability in AI models .

  4. Formalization of Feature Attribution: Towards rigorous interpretations, the paper formalizes feature attribution, which is crucial for understanding the decisions made by AI models .

  5. Tractability of Explanations: It discusses the tractability of explanations for classifier decisions, focusing on delivering precise, succinct, and efficient explanations for decision-making processes .

  6. Trustworthy AI: The paper emphasizes the importance of delivering trustworthy AI through formal XAI methods, ensuring transparency and reliability in AI decision-making processes .

  7. Interpretable ML Models: It argues that interpretable ML models must be explained, highlighting the necessity of clear and understandable explanations in the context of machine learning .

  8. Eliminating Misconceptions: The paper aims to disprove XAI myths with formal methods, providing initial results that challenge common misconceptions in the field of explainable AI .

These contributions collectively advance the field of XAI by promoting transparency, trustworthiness, and rigorous methods for explaining the decisions made by AI models, ultimately enhancing the interpretability and reliability of AI systems . The paper on Logic-Based Explainability introduces novel concepts and methods that offer distinct characteristics and advantages compared to previous approaches in eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) . Here are some key points highlighting these characteristics and advantages:

  1. Distance-Restricted Explanations: The paper proposes the concept of distance-restricted explanations, which trade off global validity for localized explanations that can be computed efficiently using existing tools. This approach significantly improves the scalability of computing explanations, especially for complex neural network models .

  2. Feature Attribution Enhancement: It addresses the limitations of previous methods like SHAP by offering alternatives that rigorously compute feature importance scores. These new methods, such as AXps and CXps, provide more accurate and reliable measures of feature importance, enhancing the interpretability of machine learning models .

  3. Certified Explainability: The paper introduces the idea of certifying computed explanations in XAI, ensuring the reliability and trustworthiness of the explanations provided. This certification process aims to validate the correctness of explanations, particularly for monotonic classifiers, paving the way for further verification of various explainability queries .

  4. Scalability Improvement: By addressing the computational complexity of computing explanations for widely used ML models like neural networks, the paper aims to enhance the scalability of logic-based XAI. This improvement is crucial for explaining large-scale ML models efficiently and effectively .

  5. Surrogate Models and Rigorous Attribution: The paper explores the conditions for using surrogate models to compute explanations for complex ML models. It emphasizes the need for rigorous feature attribution in distance-restricted explanations, ensuring that the computed explanations align closely with the original complex model, thus enhancing the interpretability of the explanations provided .

These characteristics and advancements in logic-based explainability contribute to a more robust, scalable, and trustworthy approach to XAI, offering improved interpretability and reliability in explaining the decisions made by machine learning models.


Do any related researches exist? Who are the noteworthy researchers on this topic in this field?What is the key to the solution mentioned in the paper?

Several related researches exist in the field of logic-based explainability. Noteworthy researchers in this field include J. Marques-Silva, A. Ignatiev, N. Narodytska, M. Cooper, X. Huang, among others . The key to the solution mentioned in the paper involves the emergence of logic-based XAI, its progress, main results, remaining limitations, ongoing promising research directions, and uncovering misconceptions of non-rigorous XAI .


How were the experiments in the paper designed?

The experiments in the paper were designed to focus on logic-based explainability in machine learning, particularly in the context of computing abductive explanations for widely used ML models like neural networks (NNs) . The experiments aimed to address the issue of scalability in logic-based eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) by exploring the computational complexity of computing abductive explanations for ML models . The paper highlighted the importance of delivering trustworthy AI through formal XAI methods, emphasizing the necessity for interpretable ML models to be explained . Additionally, the experiments aimed to provide formal explanations for classifier decisions, ensuring that these explanations can be reasoned about, especially in high-risk and safety-critical domains where the rigor of explanations is crucial . The experiments also delved into the computation of SHAP scores for machine learning models, which play a significant role in interpreting and understanding model predictions .


What is the dataset used for quantitative evaluation? Is the code open source?

The dataset used for quantitative evaluation in the context of logic-based explainability is not explicitly mentioned in the provided content. However, the code for the research on explainability in artificial intelligence (AI) may be open source, as it is common practice in the field to share code and research findings for transparency and reproducibility . If you are looking for a specific dataset used for quantitative evaluation, further details or references would be needed to provide a more precise answer.


Do the experiments and results in the paper provide good support for the scientific hypotheses that need to be verified? Please analyze.

The experiments and results presented in the paper provide substantial support for the scientific hypotheses that require verification. The paper outlines the progress, main outcomes, and ongoing research directions in logic-based eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) . It discusses the limitations of this approach and highlights how logic-based XAI has helped dispel misconceptions in non-rigorous XAI . The involvement of various colleagues and the acknowledgment of funding sources further enhance the credibility of the research . The references cited in the paper also indicate a rigorous approach to interpretation and consistency restoration in dynamic CSPs, contributing to the scientific validity of the hypotheses .


What are the contributions of this paper?

The paper on Logic-Based Explainability provides the following contributions:

  • Overview of the emergence of logic-based eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), detailing its progress, main results, and remaining limitations .
  • Discussion of ongoing promising research directions to address challenges in logic-based XAI .
  • Uncovering misconceptions of non-rigorous XAI through the lens of logic-based XAI .
  • Funding acknowledgments and input from various colleagues in the field .

What work can be continued in depth?

Continuing the work in depth on logic-based explainability involves several promising research directions and ongoing topics of interest. One key area is the unification of two main approaches for Explainable AI (XAI): explainability by feature attribution and explainability by feature selection . Additionally, there is a focus on studying the conditions for using surrogate models to compute explanations for complex ML models, as well as exploring the measure of rigorous feature attribution, especially in cases of distance-restricted explanations . Furthermore, ongoing research aims to address challenges related to the verification of computed explanations and the development of tools to answer various explainability queries .

Scan the QR code to ask more questions about the paper
© 2025 Powerdrill. All rights reserved.