Holistic Evaluation for Interleaved Text-and-Image Generation

Minqian Liu, Zhiyang Xu, Zihao Lin, Trevor Ashby, Joy Rimchala, Jiaxin Zhang, Lifu Huang·June 20, 2024

Summary

The paper introduces INTERLEAVEDBENCH, a novel benchmark for evaluating text-and-image generation models, addressing the lack of comprehensive evaluation methods in the field. It features a diverse range of tasks, supports arbitrary order of images and text, and uses the GPT-4-powered INTERLEAVEDEVAL metric, which assesses five key aspects: text quality, perceptual quality, image coherence, text-image coherence, and helpfulness. The benchmark outperforms previous reference-based metrics and reveals the challenges faced by current models, such as MiniGPT-5, GILL, and EMU-2, in generating contextually coherent content. The study highlights the need for improved foundation models and better recognition of subtle differences, as well as the issue of bias in using GPT-4 for evaluation. Overall, INTERLEAVEDBENCH aims to advance research on multimodal generation by providing a more rigorous and human-aligned evaluation framework.

Key findings

3

Paper digest

What problem does the paper attempt to solve? Is this a new problem?

The paper aims to address the issue of inadequate evaluation methods for interleaved text-and-image generation models. This problem is not entirely new, as existing evaluation benchmarks have limitations in supporting interleaved content and fail to comprehensively assess the quality of outputs in open-ended scenarios . The paper introduces INTERLEAVEDBENCH, a benchmark specifically designed for evaluating interleaved text-and-image generation, and proposes INTERLEAVEDEVAL, a reference-free metric powered by GPT-4o to provide accurate and explainable evaluations .


What scientific hypothesis does this paper seek to validate?

This paper aims to validate the hypothesis that the evaluation of interleaved text-and-image generation is subjective, open-ended, and challenging, even with carefully designed human evaluation aspects and guidelines . The study introduces INTERLEAVEDBENCH, a benchmark curated for evaluating interleaved text-and-image generation, and INTERLEAVEDEVAL, a reference-free metric powered by GPT-4o to provide accurate and explainable evaluation . The research focuses on assessing the quality of interleaved generation models with a strong correlation with human judgments, surpassing previous reference-based metrics .


What new ideas, methods, or models does the paper propose? What are the characteristics and advantages compared to previous methods?

The paper proposes several new ideas, methods, and models in the field of interleaved text-and-image generation:

  • Interleaved Generation Capability Enhancement: The paper focuses on enhancing Language-Modeling Models (LMMs) with the capability of interleaved generation, which involves seamlessly integrating both text and one or multiple images in the generated content .
  • Evaluation Challenges and Solutions: It addresses the challenges in evaluating interleaved generation, highlighting the limitations of existing evaluation methods that focus on text-to-image tasks rather than real-world interleaved generation scenarios. The paper suggests the need for more comprehensive evaluation metrics beyond similarity-based measures like BLEU and FID to capture the quality of outputs in tasks such as creative generation and visual storytelling .
  • Human Evaluation and Inter-Annotator Agreement: The paper conducts human evaluations with Ph.D. or master's students in NLP or multimodal domains to rate the outputs independently. Despite the subjective nature of interleaved generation evaluation, the paper emphasizes the importance of human evaluation in assessing the quality of generated content .
  • Correlation Analysis: The paper validates the proposed evaluation metric by conducting a correlation analysis between automatic metrics and human evaluation results. The INTERLEAVEDEVAL metric outperforms previous metrics, showing higher correlations, especially in aspects like text quality, which is easier to evaluate with large language models like GPT-4o .
  • Model Performance Comparison: The paper compares the performance of integrated and pipeline models, where pipeline models consistently outperform integrated models across various evaluation aspects. Notably, GPT-4o + DALL·E 3 achieves the best performance on helpfulness and overall score, indicating the effectiveness of pipeline models in interleaved generation tasks . The paper introduces several key characteristics and advantages of its proposed methods compared to previous approaches in interleaved text-and-image generation:
  • Comprehensive Evaluation Framework: The paper addresses the limitations of existing evaluation benchmarks by introducing INTERLEAVEDBENCH, a meticulously constructed benchmark that covers diverse real-world use cases and supports the evaluation of interleaved text-and-image generation with multiple quality assessment aspects .
  • Reference-Free Metric: The paper presents INTERLEAVEDEVAL, a strong reference-free metric powered by GPT-4o, which aims to deliver accurate and explainable evaluation results. This metric offers a more nuanced and comprehensive assessment compared to previous reference-based metrics, ensuring a thorough evaluation of existing models .
  • Fine-Grained Assessment: The proposed evaluation metric defines five essential evaluation aspects, including text quality, perceptual quality, image coherence, text-image coherence, and helpfulness. This fine-grained assessment allows for a detailed evaluation of the quality of generated content in interleaved generation tasks .
  • Human Evaluation Alignment: The paper conducts human evaluations that are consistent with automatic evaluations, showing that pipeline models consistently outperform integrated models by a significant margin. The human evaluation results align with the effectiveness of the proposed metric, indicating its reliability in capturing human judgments .
  • Correlation Analysis: Through correlation analysis, the paper validates the effectiveness of the proposed metric by comparing evaluation results from automatic metrics with human ratings. INTERLEAVEDEVAL consistently outperforms previous metrics, especially in aspects like text quality, showcasing its superiority in evaluating interleaved text-and-image generation tasks .
  • Model Performance Comparison: The paper compares the performance of integrated and pipeline models, highlighting that pipeline models achieve significantly better performance on various evaluation aspects, particularly excelling in text quality due to strong text generation capabilities like those of GPT-4o .

Do any related researches exist? Who are the noteworthy researchers on this topic in this field?What is the key to the solution mentioned in the paper?

Several related research works exist in the field of interleaved text-and-image generation. Noteworthy researchers in this area include Aditya Ramesh, Mikhail Pavlov, Gabriel Goh, Scott Gray, Chelsea Voss, Alec Radford, Mark Chen, Ilya Sutskever , as well as Dustin Podell, Zion English, Kyle Lacey, Andreas Blattmann, Tim Dockhorn, Jonas Müller, Joe Penna, and Robin Rombach . These researchers have contributed to advancements in multimodal learning and generative models for text and image synthesis.

The key solution mentioned in the paper "Holistic Evaluation for Interleaved Text-and-Image Generation" involves the introduction of INTERLEAVEDBENCH, a benchmark specifically curated for evaluating interleaved text-and-image generation models. Additionally, the paper presents INTERLEAVEDEVAL, a robust reference-free metric powered by GPT-4o, designed to provide accurate and explainable evaluation of models in this domain. The evaluation aspects defined in INTERLEAVEDEVAL include text quality, perceptual quality, image coherence, text-image coherence, and helpfulness, ensuring a comprehensive assessment of interleaved generation models .


How were the experiments in the paper designed?

The experiments in the paper were designed with a comprehensive setup that included the following key elements :

  • Baseline Models: The experiments benchmarked integrated models and pipeline models. Integrated models connect the Language Model Model (LMM) and image generation model via neural modules, while pipeline models connect them via prompts in natural language.
  • Evaluation Aspects: The evaluation of interleaved generation was based on five fine-grained aspects: text quality, perceptual quality, image coherence, text-image coherence, and helpfulness. Each aspect was evaluated separately.
  • Evaluation Metric: The evaluation metric used was INTERLEAVEDEVAL, which provided discrete scores based on detailed criteria. The scores ranged from 0 to 5, with 1 indicating the worst quality and 5 indicating the best quality. The metric aimed to evaluate text and image outputs comprehensively.
  • Experiment Setup: The experiments involved conducting fine-grained evaluation for various baseline approaches on INTERLEAVEDBENCH. The evaluation included comparing integrated and pipeline models, with a focus on different aspects such as text quality, perceptual quality, and image coherence.
  • Human Evaluation: In addition to automatic evaluation, extensive human evaluation was conducted to benchmark the baselines. Annotators rated each sample based on the defined evaluation aspects, providing scores for text quality, perceptual quality, image coherence, text-image coherence, and helpfulness.

Overall, the experimental design of the paper encompassed a detailed evaluation framework that considered various aspects of text-and-image generation to provide a comprehensive analysis of the models' performance .


What is the dataset used for quantitative evaluation? Is the code open source?

The dataset used for quantitative evaluation in the study is called INTERLEAVEDBENCH . The dataset is specifically designed for evaluating interleaved text-and-image generation tasks. It includes detailed instructions, multiple images in input and/or output, and is open-sourced .


Do the experiments and results in the paper provide good support for the scientific hypotheses that need to be verified? Please analyze.

The experiments and results presented in the paper provide substantial support for the scientific hypotheses that needed verification. The study introduces INTERLEAVEDBENCH, a benchmark tailored for evaluating interleaved text-and-image generation, addressing the existing gaps in evaluation benchmarks . The research also introduces INTERLEAVEDEVAL, a robust reference-free metric powered by GPT-4o, which demonstrates a strong correlation with human judgments, surpassing previous reference-based metrics . Additionally, the study conducts extensive experiments and rigorous human evaluations, showcasing the effectiveness of the benchmark and metric in evaluating existing models .

The results from the experiments reveal that the pipeline models consistently outperform integrated models across various evaluation aspects, with GPT-4o + DALL·E 3 achieving the best performance in terms of helpfulness and overall average score . The study also highlights significant room for improvement in integrated open-sourced models, indicating areas where advancements can be made . Furthermore, the correlation analysis conducted validates the effectiveness of the proposed metric by comparing evaluation results from automatic metrics with human evaluation results, showing superior performance in various aspects .

Overall, the experiments and results detailed in the paper provide a strong foundation for verifying the scientific hypotheses related to interleaved text-and-image generation evaluation. The comprehensive evaluation setup, innovative benchmarks, and correlation analyses contribute to the credibility and reliability of the study's findings, supporting the scientific hypotheses effectively .


What are the contributions of this paper?

The paper makes several key contributions in the field of interleaved text-and-image generation evaluation:

  • It introduces INTERLEAVEDBENCH, the first benchmark curated for evaluating interleaved text-and-image generation, covering diverse real-world tasks .
  • The paper presents INTERLEAVEDEVAL, a strong reference-free metric powered by GPT-4o for accurate and explainable evaluation, defining five essential evaluation aspects .
  • Through extensive experiments and rigorous human evaluation, the benchmark and metric effectively evaluate existing models with a strong correlation with human judgments, surpassing previous reference-based metrics .
  • The findings and insights provided aim to advance future research in interleaved generation and its evaluation .

What work can be continued in depth?

Further research in the field of interleaved text-and-image generation can be expanded in several areas based on the existing work:

  • Improving Evaluation Metrics: There is a need to enhance evaluation metrics beyond existing similarity-based measures like BLEU and FID, which may not fully capture the quality of outputs in open-ended scenarios . Developing more comprehensive evaluation frameworks that consider aspects like perceptual quality, coherence between text and images, and overall helpfulness can lead to more accurate assessments .
  • Addressing Model Limitations: Future research could focus on refining multimodal models to better recognize subtle but crucial differences in generated content, especially in tasks requiring interleaved text and images . This could involve enhancing the capabilities of foundation multimodal models to improve the quality and coherence of interleaved outputs.
  • Bias Analysis: It is essential to delve deeper into the bias implications of using specific models like GPT-4 for evaluation purposes . Future studies could explore the potential biases in evaluation metrics and models to ensure fair and unbiased assessments in the field of interleaved text-and-image generation.

Tables

2

Introduction
Background
Lack of comprehensive evaluation methods in text-and-image generation
Importance of evaluating multimodal models effectively
Objective
To introduce a novel benchmark for model assessment
To address the current evaluation gap in the field
Method
Data Collection
Diverse range of tasks and arbitrary order of images and text
Inclusion of GPT-4 for evaluation
Data Preprocessing
Preparation of tasks for the INTERLEAVEDEVAL metric
INTERLEAVEDEVAL Metric
Text Quality
Assessment of linguistic coherence and relevance
Perceptual Quality
Image clarity, realism, and visual appeal
Image Coherence
Consistency between images and their captions
Text-Image Coherence
Seamless integration of text and images
Helpfulness
Relevance and usefulness of generated content
Model Evaluation
Comparison with previous models (MiniGPT-5, GILL, EMU-2)
Identification of model strengths and weaknesses
Limitations and Bias
Recognition of subtle differences in model performance
Addressing potential bias in GPT-4 usage for evaluation
Challenges and Insights
Foundation model improvements needed
Importance of contextually coherent content
Future research directions
Conclusion
Contribution to multimodal generation research
The role of INTERLEAVEDBENCH in advancing human-aligned evaluation
Future Work
Plan for updating and expanding the benchmark
Call for community involvement in benchmark development
Basic info
papers
computer vision and pattern recognition
computation and language
artificial intelligence
Advanced features
Insights
What insights does the study offer regarding the improvement of foundation models and evaluation biases?
What is the primary purpose of the INTERLEAVEDBENCH benchmark?
How does the GPT-4-powered INTERLEAVEDEVAL metric evaluate text-and-image generation models?
Which models are mentioned in the text as facing challenges in contextually coherent content generation?

Holistic Evaluation for Interleaved Text-and-Image Generation

Minqian Liu, Zhiyang Xu, Zihao Lin, Trevor Ashby, Joy Rimchala, Jiaxin Zhang, Lifu Huang·June 20, 2024

Summary

The paper introduces INTERLEAVEDBENCH, a novel benchmark for evaluating text-and-image generation models, addressing the lack of comprehensive evaluation methods in the field. It features a diverse range of tasks, supports arbitrary order of images and text, and uses the GPT-4-powered INTERLEAVEDEVAL metric, which assesses five key aspects: text quality, perceptual quality, image coherence, text-image coherence, and helpfulness. The benchmark outperforms previous reference-based metrics and reveals the challenges faced by current models, such as MiniGPT-5, GILL, and EMU-2, in generating contextually coherent content. The study highlights the need for improved foundation models and better recognition of subtle differences, as well as the issue of bias in using GPT-4 for evaluation. Overall, INTERLEAVEDBENCH aims to advance research on multimodal generation by providing a more rigorous and human-aligned evaluation framework.
Mind map
Addressing potential bias in GPT-4 usage for evaluation
Recognition of subtle differences in model performance
Relevance and usefulness of generated content
Helpfulness
Seamless integration of text and images
Text-Image Coherence
Consistency between images and their captions
Image Coherence
Image clarity, realism, and visual appeal
Perceptual Quality
Assessment of linguistic coherence and relevance
Text Quality
Limitations and Bias
INTERLEAVEDEVAL Metric
Inclusion of GPT-4 for evaluation
Diverse range of tasks and arbitrary order of images and text
To address the current evaluation gap in the field
To introduce a novel benchmark for model assessment
Importance of evaluating multimodal models effectively
Lack of comprehensive evaluation methods in text-and-image generation
Call for community involvement in benchmark development
Plan for updating and expanding the benchmark
The role of INTERLEAVEDBENCH in advancing human-aligned evaluation
Contribution to multimodal generation research
Future research directions
Importance of contextually coherent content
Foundation model improvements needed
Model Evaluation
Data Preprocessing
Data Collection
Objective
Background
Future Work
Conclusion
Challenges and Insights
Method
Introduction
Outline
Introduction
Background
Lack of comprehensive evaluation methods in text-and-image generation
Importance of evaluating multimodal models effectively
Objective
To introduce a novel benchmark for model assessment
To address the current evaluation gap in the field
Method
Data Collection
Diverse range of tasks and arbitrary order of images and text
Inclusion of GPT-4 for evaluation
Data Preprocessing
Preparation of tasks for the INTERLEAVEDEVAL metric
INTERLEAVEDEVAL Metric
Text Quality
Assessment of linguistic coherence and relevance
Perceptual Quality
Image clarity, realism, and visual appeal
Image Coherence
Consistency between images and their captions
Text-Image Coherence
Seamless integration of text and images
Helpfulness
Relevance and usefulness of generated content
Model Evaluation
Comparison with previous models (MiniGPT-5, GILL, EMU-2)
Identification of model strengths and weaknesses
Limitations and Bias
Recognition of subtle differences in model performance
Addressing potential bias in GPT-4 usage for evaluation
Challenges and Insights
Foundation model improvements needed
Importance of contextually coherent content
Future research directions
Conclusion
Contribution to multimodal generation research
The role of INTERLEAVEDBENCH in advancing human-aligned evaluation
Future Work
Plan for updating and expanding the benchmark
Call for community involvement in benchmark development
Key findings
3

Paper digest

What problem does the paper attempt to solve? Is this a new problem?

The paper aims to address the issue of inadequate evaluation methods for interleaved text-and-image generation models. This problem is not entirely new, as existing evaluation benchmarks have limitations in supporting interleaved content and fail to comprehensively assess the quality of outputs in open-ended scenarios . The paper introduces INTERLEAVEDBENCH, a benchmark specifically designed for evaluating interleaved text-and-image generation, and proposes INTERLEAVEDEVAL, a reference-free metric powered by GPT-4o to provide accurate and explainable evaluations .


What scientific hypothesis does this paper seek to validate?

This paper aims to validate the hypothesis that the evaluation of interleaved text-and-image generation is subjective, open-ended, and challenging, even with carefully designed human evaluation aspects and guidelines . The study introduces INTERLEAVEDBENCH, a benchmark curated for evaluating interleaved text-and-image generation, and INTERLEAVEDEVAL, a reference-free metric powered by GPT-4o to provide accurate and explainable evaluation . The research focuses on assessing the quality of interleaved generation models with a strong correlation with human judgments, surpassing previous reference-based metrics .


What new ideas, methods, or models does the paper propose? What are the characteristics and advantages compared to previous methods?

The paper proposes several new ideas, methods, and models in the field of interleaved text-and-image generation:

  • Interleaved Generation Capability Enhancement: The paper focuses on enhancing Language-Modeling Models (LMMs) with the capability of interleaved generation, which involves seamlessly integrating both text and one or multiple images in the generated content .
  • Evaluation Challenges and Solutions: It addresses the challenges in evaluating interleaved generation, highlighting the limitations of existing evaluation methods that focus on text-to-image tasks rather than real-world interleaved generation scenarios. The paper suggests the need for more comprehensive evaluation metrics beyond similarity-based measures like BLEU and FID to capture the quality of outputs in tasks such as creative generation and visual storytelling .
  • Human Evaluation and Inter-Annotator Agreement: The paper conducts human evaluations with Ph.D. or master's students in NLP or multimodal domains to rate the outputs independently. Despite the subjective nature of interleaved generation evaluation, the paper emphasizes the importance of human evaluation in assessing the quality of generated content .
  • Correlation Analysis: The paper validates the proposed evaluation metric by conducting a correlation analysis between automatic metrics and human evaluation results. The INTERLEAVEDEVAL metric outperforms previous metrics, showing higher correlations, especially in aspects like text quality, which is easier to evaluate with large language models like GPT-4o .
  • Model Performance Comparison: The paper compares the performance of integrated and pipeline models, where pipeline models consistently outperform integrated models across various evaluation aspects. Notably, GPT-4o + DALL·E 3 achieves the best performance on helpfulness and overall score, indicating the effectiveness of pipeline models in interleaved generation tasks . The paper introduces several key characteristics and advantages of its proposed methods compared to previous approaches in interleaved text-and-image generation:
  • Comprehensive Evaluation Framework: The paper addresses the limitations of existing evaluation benchmarks by introducing INTERLEAVEDBENCH, a meticulously constructed benchmark that covers diverse real-world use cases and supports the evaluation of interleaved text-and-image generation with multiple quality assessment aspects .
  • Reference-Free Metric: The paper presents INTERLEAVEDEVAL, a strong reference-free metric powered by GPT-4o, which aims to deliver accurate and explainable evaluation results. This metric offers a more nuanced and comprehensive assessment compared to previous reference-based metrics, ensuring a thorough evaluation of existing models .
  • Fine-Grained Assessment: The proposed evaluation metric defines five essential evaluation aspects, including text quality, perceptual quality, image coherence, text-image coherence, and helpfulness. This fine-grained assessment allows for a detailed evaluation of the quality of generated content in interleaved generation tasks .
  • Human Evaluation Alignment: The paper conducts human evaluations that are consistent with automatic evaluations, showing that pipeline models consistently outperform integrated models by a significant margin. The human evaluation results align with the effectiveness of the proposed metric, indicating its reliability in capturing human judgments .
  • Correlation Analysis: Through correlation analysis, the paper validates the effectiveness of the proposed metric by comparing evaluation results from automatic metrics with human ratings. INTERLEAVEDEVAL consistently outperforms previous metrics, especially in aspects like text quality, showcasing its superiority in evaluating interleaved text-and-image generation tasks .
  • Model Performance Comparison: The paper compares the performance of integrated and pipeline models, highlighting that pipeline models achieve significantly better performance on various evaluation aspects, particularly excelling in text quality due to strong text generation capabilities like those of GPT-4o .

Do any related researches exist? Who are the noteworthy researchers on this topic in this field?What is the key to the solution mentioned in the paper?

Several related research works exist in the field of interleaved text-and-image generation. Noteworthy researchers in this area include Aditya Ramesh, Mikhail Pavlov, Gabriel Goh, Scott Gray, Chelsea Voss, Alec Radford, Mark Chen, Ilya Sutskever , as well as Dustin Podell, Zion English, Kyle Lacey, Andreas Blattmann, Tim Dockhorn, Jonas Müller, Joe Penna, and Robin Rombach . These researchers have contributed to advancements in multimodal learning and generative models for text and image synthesis.

The key solution mentioned in the paper "Holistic Evaluation for Interleaved Text-and-Image Generation" involves the introduction of INTERLEAVEDBENCH, a benchmark specifically curated for evaluating interleaved text-and-image generation models. Additionally, the paper presents INTERLEAVEDEVAL, a robust reference-free metric powered by GPT-4o, designed to provide accurate and explainable evaluation of models in this domain. The evaluation aspects defined in INTERLEAVEDEVAL include text quality, perceptual quality, image coherence, text-image coherence, and helpfulness, ensuring a comprehensive assessment of interleaved generation models .


How were the experiments in the paper designed?

The experiments in the paper were designed with a comprehensive setup that included the following key elements :

  • Baseline Models: The experiments benchmarked integrated models and pipeline models. Integrated models connect the Language Model Model (LMM) and image generation model via neural modules, while pipeline models connect them via prompts in natural language.
  • Evaluation Aspects: The evaluation of interleaved generation was based on five fine-grained aspects: text quality, perceptual quality, image coherence, text-image coherence, and helpfulness. Each aspect was evaluated separately.
  • Evaluation Metric: The evaluation metric used was INTERLEAVEDEVAL, which provided discrete scores based on detailed criteria. The scores ranged from 0 to 5, with 1 indicating the worst quality and 5 indicating the best quality. The metric aimed to evaluate text and image outputs comprehensively.
  • Experiment Setup: The experiments involved conducting fine-grained evaluation for various baseline approaches on INTERLEAVEDBENCH. The evaluation included comparing integrated and pipeline models, with a focus on different aspects such as text quality, perceptual quality, and image coherence.
  • Human Evaluation: In addition to automatic evaluation, extensive human evaluation was conducted to benchmark the baselines. Annotators rated each sample based on the defined evaluation aspects, providing scores for text quality, perceptual quality, image coherence, text-image coherence, and helpfulness.

Overall, the experimental design of the paper encompassed a detailed evaluation framework that considered various aspects of text-and-image generation to provide a comprehensive analysis of the models' performance .


What is the dataset used for quantitative evaluation? Is the code open source?

The dataset used for quantitative evaluation in the study is called INTERLEAVEDBENCH . The dataset is specifically designed for evaluating interleaved text-and-image generation tasks. It includes detailed instructions, multiple images in input and/or output, and is open-sourced .


Do the experiments and results in the paper provide good support for the scientific hypotheses that need to be verified? Please analyze.

The experiments and results presented in the paper provide substantial support for the scientific hypotheses that needed verification. The study introduces INTERLEAVEDBENCH, a benchmark tailored for evaluating interleaved text-and-image generation, addressing the existing gaps in evaluation benchmarks . The research also introduces INTERLEAVEDEVAL, a robust reference-free metric powered by GPT-4o, which demonstrates a strong correlation with human judgments, surpassing previous reference-based metrics . Additionally, the study conducts extensive experiments and rigorous human evaluations, showcasing the effectiveness of the benchmark and metric in evaluating existing models .

The results from the experiments reveal that the pipeline models consistently outperform integrated models across various evaluation aspects, with GPT-4o + DALL·E 3 achieving the best performance in terms of helpfulness and overall average score . The study also highlights significant room for improvement in integrated open-sourced models, indicating areas where advancements can be made . Furthermore, the correlation analysis conducted validates the effectiveness of the proposed metric by comparing evaluation results from automatic metrics with human evaluation results, showing superior performance in various aspects .

Overall, the experiments and results detailed in the paper provide a strong foundation for verifying the scientific hypotheses related to interleaved text-and-image generation evaluation. The comprehensive evaluation setup, innovative benchmarks, and correlation analyses contribute to the credibility and reliability of the study's findings, supporting the scientific hypotheses effectively .


What are the contributions of this paper?

The paper makes several key contributions in the field of interleaved text-and-image generation evaluation:

  • It introduces INTERLEAVEDBENCH, the first benchmark curated for evaluating interleaved text-and-image generation, covering diverse real-world tasks .
  • The paper presents INTERLEAVEDEVAL, a strong reference-free metric powered by GPT-4o for accurate and explainable evaluation, defining five essential evaluation aspects .
  • Through extensive experiments and rigorous human evaluation, the benchmark and metric effectively evaluate existing models with a strong correlation with human judgments, surpassing previous reference-based metrics .
  • The findings and insights provided aim to advance future research in interleaved generation and its evaluation .

What work can be continued in depth?

Further research in the field of interleaved text-and-image generation can be expanded in several areas based on the existing work:

  • Improving Evaluation Metrics: There is a need to enhance evaluation metrics beyond existing similarity-based measures like BLEU and FID, which may not fully capture the quality of outputs in open-ended scenarios . Developing more comprehensive evaluation frameworks that consider aspects like perceptual quality, coherence between text and images, and overall helpfulness can lead to more accurate assessments .
  • Addressing Model Limitations: Future research could focus on refining multimodal models to better recognize subtle but crucial differences in generated content, especially in tasks requiring interleaved text and images . This could involve enhancing the capabilities of foundation multimodal models to improve the quality and coherence of interleaved outputs.
  • Bias Analysis: It is essential to delve deeper into the bias implications of using specific models like GPT-4 for evaluation purposes . Future studies could explore the potential biases in evaluation metrics and models to ensure fair and unbiased assessments in the field of interleaved text-and-image generation.
Tables
2
Scan the QR code to ask more questions about the paper
© 2025 Powerdrill. All rights reserved.