Dual-Space Knowledge Distillation for Large Language Models

Songming Zhang, Xue Zhang, Zengkui Sun, Yufeng Chen, Jinan Xu·June 25, 2024

Summary

The paper proposes Dual-Space Knowledge Distillation (DSKD), a framework for enhancing knowledge distillation in large language models (LLMs) by addressing vocabulary discrepancies. DSKD unifies output spaces, introduces cross-model attention for alignment, and supports various distance functions, improving compatibility between models with different vocabularies. Experiments on instruction-following benchmarks demonstrate that DSKD significantly outperforms existing methods, especially when dealing with models with distinct vocabularies. The study highlights the limitations of current white-box KD frameworks and showcases the benefits of DSKD in terms of improved representation and distribution similarity, leading to better knowledge transfer and model performance.

Key findings

6

Paper digest

What problem does the paper attempt to solve? Is this a new problem?

To provide a more accurate answer, I would need more specific information about the paper you are referring to. Please provide me with the title of the paper or a brief description of its topic so I can assist you better.


What scientific hypothesis does this paper seek to validate?

The scientific hypothesis that this paper seeks to validate is related to the impact of different aspects on the similarity between the student and teacher models in knowledge distillation for large language models. The paper hypothesizes that differences in representation and distribution, specifically in the output hidden states and prediction heads of the student and teacher models, can limit the similarity between them during the knowledge distillation process . The experiment conducted in the paper aims to verify this hypothesis by simulating the knowledge distillation process with different settings, such as using shared prediction heads for the student and teacher models, to observe the resulting similarity between their hidden states . The study also explores the effectiveness of unifying the output spaces of the student and teacher models by sharing prediction heads as an alternative approach to enhance the similarity between them .


What new ideas, methods, or models does the paper propose? What are the characteristics and advantages compared to previous methods?

The paper "Dual-Space Knowledge Distillation for Large Language Models" proposes a novel framework called DSKD (Dual-Space Knowledge Distillation) for compressing large language models (LLMs) . This framework aims to address the limitations of existing white-box knowledge distillation (KD) methods by conducting KD in unified output spaces, which leads to better performance in model compression . DSKD introduces a method that sorts and pads two distributions and minimizes the total variation distance between them, offering a new approach to knowledge distillation .

Furthermore, the paper compares the DSKD framework with traditional black-box KD methods and demonstrates that white-box KD methods, including DSKD, outperform black-box methods like SeqKD by transferring more knowledge through token-level distributions . The results show that DSKD significantly improves the performance of white-box KD for models like GPT2 and TinyLLaMA across various distance functions, highlighting the effectiveness of the proposed framework .

Additionally, the paper references other works in the field of knowledge distillation for large language models, such as "Rethinking Kullback-Leibler Divergence in Knowledge Distillation for Large Language Models" by Tao et al. , and "Tinyllama: An Open-Source Small Language Model" by Zhang et al. . These works contribute to the broader landscape of research on compressing and distilling knowledge from large language models . The paper "Dual-Space Knowledge Distillation for Large Language Models" introduces the DSKD (Dual-Space Knowledge Distillation) framework, which offers several characteristics and advantages compared to previous methods:

  1. Unified Output Spaces: DSKD conducts knowledge distillation in unified output spaces, which allows for a more effective transfer of knowledge from the teacher model to the student model. By aligning the distributions in these unified spaces, DSKD can better capture the nuances of the teacher model's output, leading to improved compression of large language models.

  2. Total Variation Distance Minimization: DSKD introduces a novel method that sorts and pads two distributions and minimizes the total variation distance between them. This approach enables DSKD to distill knowledge more efficiently by focusing on the differences between the teacher and student model distributions, resulting in a more accurate transfer of information.

  3. Token-Level Distribution Transfer: The paper demonstrates that DSKD excels in transferring knowledge through token-level distributions, outperforming traditional black-box knowledge distillation methods like SeqKD. By leveraging token-level distributions, DSKD can capture fine-grained details from the teacher model and incorporate them into the student model more effectively.

  4. Performance Improvement: Experimental results presented in the paper show that DSKD significantly improves the performance of white-box knowledge distillation for large language models such as GPT2 and TinyLLaMA. By leveraging the unique characteristics of the DSKD framework, researchers were able to achieve better compression rates and model performance compared to existing methods.

  5. Comparison with Existing Works: The paper provides a comprehensive comparison of DSKD with other works in the field of knowledge distillation for large language models, such as "Rethinking Kullback-Leibler Divergence in Knowledge Distillation for Large Language Models" and "Tinyllama: An Open-Source Small Language Model." This comparison highlights the strengths of the DSKD framework and its advantages over traditional approaches in terms of knowledge transfer and model compression.

In summary, the DSKD framework stands out due to its focus on unified output spaces, total variation distance minimization, token-level distribution transfer, performance improvements, and thorough comparison with existing works. These characteristics and advantages position DSKD as a promising approach for compressing large language models effectively and efficiently.


Do any related researches exist? Who are the noteworthy researchers on this topic in this field?What is the key to the solution mentioned in the paper?

In the field related to the topic discussed in the paper "Dual-Space Knowledge Distillation for Large Language Models," there are several noteworthy researchers who have contributed to this area. Some of the prominent researchers in this field include Hinton, Vinyals, and Dean, who have made significant contributions to knowledge distillation and large language models .

The key solution mentioned in the paper involves a process called Dual-Space Knowledge Distillation. This process involves aligning the teacher's embeddings and output hidden states with the student's tokens through query, key, and value vectors. By calculating attention matrices and aligning hidden states between the teacher and student models, the knowledge distillation process occurs in both the student and teacher spaces, facilitating effective learning and model compression .


How were the experiments in the paper designed?

The experiments in the paper were designed to evaluate the Dual-Space Knowledge Distillation (DSKD) framework for Large Language Models (LLMs) through a series of simulations and tests .

  1. Simulation Experiment Design:

    • The experiments involved initializing two sets of 2-D vectors representing the output hidden states of the student and teacher models with different mean values and variances .
    • Two prediction heads were set to produce probability distributions for the student and teacher models based on these vectors .
    • The KL divergence was selected as the distance function for the Knowledge Distillation (KD) process, and simulations were conducted for 1000 iterations to optimize the student's hidden states .
    • The experiments aimed to compare the outcomes of the current white-box KD framework, which uses distributions from different output spaces, with a modified approach that unifies the output spaces of the student and teacher models by sharing the same prediction head .
  2. Experimental Setup:

    • The DSKD framework was evaluated on various instruction-following datasets, including Dolly, Self-Instruction, Vicuna-Evaluation, Super Natural Instructions, and Unnatural Instructions .
    • Different LLM models were selected as students and teachers, such as GPT2-120M, TinyLLaMA-1.1B, GPT2-1.5B, Qwen1.5-1.8B, LLaMA2-7B, and Mistral-7B, with varying vocabularies .
    • Training configurations, including epoch, learning rate, projector learning rate, and batch size, were specified for each model to conduct the KD process .
  3. Evaluation:

    • The performance of the DSKD framework was evaluated based on Rouge-L scores on different benchmarks, comparing the results of KD in the student space, KD in the teacher space, and a combination of both for various distance functions .
    • The experiments aimed to assess the effectiveness of DSKD in enhancing the similarity between student and teacher models by unifying the output spaces and optimizing the hidden states .

Overall, the experiments were meticulously designed to investigate the impact of different approaches to knowledge distillation on the representation similarity between student and teacher models in the context of Large Language Models .


What is the dataset used for quantitative evaluation? Is the code open source?

The dataset used for quantitative evaluation in the study is the databricks-dolly-15k dataset processed by Gu et al. (2023) . The code for the study is open source and publicly available at https://github.com/songmzhang/DSKD .


Do the experiments and results in the paper provide good support for the scientific hypotheses that need to be verified? Please analyze.

The experiments and results presented in the paper provide strong support for the scientific hypotheses that needed verification. The simulations conducted in the study demonstrated that when using different prediction heads for the student and teacher models, the similarity between their hidden states and distributions was limited, leading to sub-optimal similarity . However, when unifying the output spaces by sharing the same prediction head for both models, the student's hidden states became more similar and closer to the teacher's hidden states, indicating a more effective knowledge distillation process .

Furthermore, the study explored various distance functions such as KL divergence, reverse KL divergence, JS divergence, skewed KL divergence, skewed RKL divergence, and adaptive KL divergence. The results consistently showed that regardless of the distance function used, the student model after knowledge distillation had low representation similarity with the teacher model when different prediction heads were employed . This finding underscores the importance of unifying the output spaces to enhance the similarity between the student and teacher models during the knowledge distillation process .

Moreover, the full results of the experiments revealed that knowledge distillation in the student space outperformed vanilla knowledge distillation in different spaces across all distance functions. However, knowledge distillation in the teacher space only led to limited improvement for some distance functions, with KL divergence showing relatively good performance for teacher space knowledge distillation . This detailed analysis further supports the effectiveness of unifying the output spaces by sharing the prediction head for both the student and teacher models to achieve better knowledge distillation results .


What are the contributions of this paper?

The paper "Dual-Space Knowledge Distillation for Large Language Models" makes several contributions:

  • It introduces a novel approach called Dual-Space Knowledge Distillation (DSKD) for large language models, which involves distilling knowledge in both the student and teacher spaces .
  • The paper presents results showing that knowledge distillation (KD) in the student space yields better performance than vanilla KD in different spaces for all distance functions, with KL divergence showing relatively good performance for KD in the teacher space .
  • It highlights the importance of unifying the output spaces by sharing the prediction head for teacher and student models to achieve a more effective knowledge distillation process .
  • The study provides detailed results and comparisons for various distance functions used in the knowledge distillation process, showcasing the impact of different approaches on enhancing the similarity between student and teacher models .
  • Additionally, the paper evaluates the quality of responses using the GPT-4 model and discusses the process of pairwise comparison between responses from different models to mitigate order bias in the evaluation .
  • Overall, the paper contributes to advancing the field of knowledge distillation for large language models by proposing the DSKD approach and providing insights into the effectiveness of different distance functions and shared prediction heads in the distillation process .

What work can be continued in depth?

Work that can be continued in depth typically involves projects or tasks that require further analysis, research, or development. This could include:

  1. Research projects that require more data collection, analysis, and interpretation.
  2. Complex problem-solving tasks that need further exploration and experimentation.
  3. Creative projects such as writing, art, or design that can be refined and expanded upon.
  4. Skill development in areas such as learning a new language, mastering a musical instrument, or honing a craft.
  5. Professional development activities like further education, training, or certifications to deepen expertise in a particular field.

If you have a specific area of work in mind, feel free to provide more details so I can offer more tailored suggestions.

Tables

1

Introduction
Background
[A. Vocabulary Discrepancies in LLMs]
[B. Challenges in Knowledge Distillation]
Objective
[1. To address vocabulary issues in LLMs]
[2. To propose a unified framework for improved knowledge transfer]
[3. To enhance model performance with cross-model attention]
Method
Data Collection
[A. Selection of Instruction-Following Benchmarks]
[B. Datasets with diverse vocabulary models]
Data Preprocessing
[1. Unification of Output Spaces]
[2. Cross-Model Attention Mechanism]
[a. Attention-based alignment process]
[3. Varying Distance Functions]
[i. Selection of appropriate functions for different vocabularies]
[4. Handling Vocabulary Discrepancies]
[a. Mapping techniques for compatible representations]
Experiments and Evaluation
[A. Experimental Setup]
[1. Baseline methods comparison]
[2. Model architectures involved]
[B. Performance Metrics]
[1. Accuracy improvements]
[2. Representation and distribution similarity]
[C. Results and Analysis]
[1. DSKD's superiority in diverse vocabulary scenarios]
[2. Limitations of existing white-box KD frameworks]
Conclusion
[A. Summary of DSKD's contributions]
[B. Implications for future LLM development]
[C. Recommendations for practical applications]
[D. Limitations and future research directions]
Basic info
papers
computation and language
artificial intelligence
Advanced features
Insights
What are the key components of DSKD that contribute to improved compatibility between models with different vocabularies?
How does DSKD perform compared to existing methods on instruction-following benchmarks, and in what scenarios does it show significant improvement?
How does DSKD address vocabulary discrepancies in large language models?
What is the primary focus of the paper Dual-Space Knowledge Distillation (DSKD)?

Dual-Space Knowledge Distillation for Large Language Models

Songming Zhang, Xue Zhang, Zengkui Sun, Yufeng Chen, Jinan Xu·June 25, 2024

Summary

The paper proposes Dual-Space Knowledge Distillation (DSKD), a framework for enhancing knowledge distillation in large language models (LLMs) by addressing vocabulary discrepancies. DSKD unifies output spaces, introduces cross-model attention for alignment, and supports various distance functions, improving compatibility between models with different vocabularies. Experiments on instruction-following benchmarks demonstrate that DSKD significantly outperforms existing methods, especially when dealing with models with distinct vocabularies. The study highlights the limitations of current white-box KD frameworks and showcases the benefits of DSKD in terms of improved representation and distribution similarity, leading to better knowledge transfer and model performance.
Mind map
[2. Limitations of existing white-box KD frameworks]
[1. DSKD's superiority in diverse vocabulary scenarios]
[C. Results and Analysis]
[2. Representation and distribution similarity]
[1. Accuracy improvements]
[B. Performance Metrics]
[2. Model architectures involved]
[1. Baseline methods comparison]
[A. Experimental Setup]
[a. Mapping techniques for compatible representations]
[4. Handling Vocabulary Discrepancies]
[i. Selection of appropriate functions for different vocabularies]
[3. Varying Distance Functions]
[a. Attention-based alignment process]
[2. Cross-Model Attention Mechanism]
[1. Unification of Output Spaces]
[B. Datasets with diverse vocabulary models]
[A. Selection of Instruction-Following Benchmarks]
[3. To enhance model performance with cross-model attention]
[2. To propose a unified framework for improved knowledge transfer]
[1. To address vocabulary issues in LLMs]
[B. Challenges in Knowledge Distillation]
[A. Vocabulary Discrepancies in LLMs]
[D. Limitations and future research directions]
[C. Recommendations for practical applications]
[B. Implications for future LLM development]
[A. Summary of DSKD's contributions]
Experiments and Evaluation
Data Preprocessing
Data Collection
Objective
Background
Conclusion
Method
Introduction
Outline
Introduction
Background
[A. Vocabulary Discrepancies in LLMs]
[B. Challenges in Knowledge Distillation]
Objective
[1. To address vocabulary issues in LLMs]
[2. To propose a unified framework for improved knowledge transfer]
[3. To enhance model performance with cross-model attention]
Method
Data Collection
[A. Selection of Instruction-Following Benchmarks]
[B. Datasets with diverse vocabulary models]
Data Preprocessing
[1. Unification of Output Spaces]
[2. Cross-Model Attention Mechanism]
[a. Attention-based alignment process]
[3. Varying Distance Functions]
[i. Selection of appropriate functions for different vocabularies]
[4. Handling Vocabulary Discrepancies]
[a. Mapping techniques for compatible representations]
Experiments and Evaluation
[A. Experimental Setup]
[1. Baseline methods comparison]
[2. Model architectures involved]
[B. Performance Metrics]
[1. Accuracy improvements]
[2. Representation and distribution similarity]
[C. Results and Analysis]
[1. DSKD's superiority in diverse vocabulary scenarios]
[2. Limitations of existing white-box KD frameworks]
Conclusion
[A. Summary of DSKD's contributions]
[B. Implications for future LLM development]
[C. Recommendations for practical applications]
[D. Limitations and future research directions]
Key findings
6

Paper digest

What problem does the paper attempt to solve? Is this a new problem?

To provide a more accurate answer, I would need more specific information about the paper you are referring to. Please provide me with the title of the paper or a brief description of its topic so I can assist you better.


What scientific hypothesis does this paper seek to validate?

The scientific hypothesis that this paper seeks to validate is related to the impact of different aspects on the similarity between the student and teacher models in knowledge distillation for large language models. The paper hypothesizes that differences in representation and distribution, specifically in the output hidden states and prediction heads of the student and teacher models, can limit the similarity between them during the knowledge distillation process . The experiment conducted in the paper aims to verify this hypothesis by simulating the knowledge distillation process with different settings, such as using shared prediction heads for the student and teacher models, to observe the resulting similarity between their hidden states . The study also explores the effectiveness of unifying the output spaces of the student and teacher models by sharing prediction heads as an alternative approach to enhance the similarity between them .


What new ideas, methods, or models does the paper propose? What are the characteristics and advantages compared to previous methods?

The paper "Dual-Space Knowledge Distillation for Large Language Models" proposes a novel framework called DSKD (Dual-Space Knowledge Distillation) for compressing large language models (LLMs) . This framework aims to address the limitations of existing white-box knowledge distillation (KD) methods by conducting KD in unified output spaces, which leads to better performance in model compression . DSKD introduces a method that sorts and pads two distributions and minimizes the total variation distance between them, offering a new approach to knowledge distillation .

Furthermore, the paper compares the DSKD framework with traditional black-box KD methods and demonstrates that white-box KD methods, including DSKD, outperform black-box methods like SeqKD by transferring more knowledge through token-level distributions . The results show that DSKD significantly improves the performance of white-box KD for models like GPT2 and TinyLLaMA across various distance functions, highlighting the effectiveness of the proposed framework .

Additionally, the paper references other works in the field of knowledge distillation for large language models, such as "Rethinking Kullback-Leibler Divergence in Knowledge Distillation for Large Language Models" by Tao et al. , and "Tinyllama: An Open-Source Small Language Model" by Zhang et al. . These works contribute to the broader landscape of research on compressing and distilling knowledge from large language models . The paper "Dual-Space Knowledge Distillation for Large Language Models" introduces the DSKD (Dual-Space Knowledge Distillation) framework, which offers several characteristics and advantages compared to previous methods:

  1. Unified Output Spaces: DSKD conducts knowledge distillation in unified output spaces, which allows for a more effective transfer of knowledge from the teacher model to the student model. By aligning the distributions in these unified spaces, DSKD can better capture the nuances of the teacher model's output, leading to improved compression of large language models.

  2. Total Variation Distance Minimization: DSKD introduces a novel method that sorts and pads two distributions and minimizes the total variation distance between them. This approach enables DSKD to distill knowledge more efficiently by focusing on the differences between the teacher and student model distributions, resulting in a more accurate transfer of information.

  3. Token-Level Distribution Transfer: The paper demonstrates that DSKD excels in transferring knowledge through token-level distributions, outperforming traditional black-box knowledge distillation methods like SeqKD. By leveraging token-level distributions, DSKD can capture fine-grained details from the teacher model and incorporate them into the student model more effectively.

  4. Performance Improvement: Experimental results presented in the paper show that DSKD significantly improves the performance of white-box knowledge distillation for large language models such as GPT2 and TinyLLaMA. By leveraging the unique characteristics of the DSKD framework, researchers were able to achieve better compression rates and model performance compared to existing methods.

  5. Comparison with Existing Works: The paper provides a comprehensive comparison of DSKD with other works in the field of knowledge distillation for large language models, such as "Rethinking Kullback-Leibler Divergence in Knowledge Distillation for Large Language Models" and "Tinyllama: An Open-Source Small Language Model." This comparison highlights the strengths of the DSKD framework and its advantages over traditional approaches in terms of knowledge transfer and model compression.

In summary, the DSKD framework stands out due to its focus on unified output spaces, total variation distance minimization, token-level distribution transfer, performance improvements, and thorough comparison with existing works. These characteristics and advantages position DSKD as a promising approach for compressing large language models effectively and efficiently.


Do any related researches exist? Who are the noteworthy researchers on this topic in this field?What is the key to the solution mentioned in the paper?

In the field related to the topic discussed in the paper "Dual-Space Knowledge Distillation for Large Language Models," there are several noteworthy researchers who have contributed to this area. Some of the prominent researchers in this field include Hinton, Vinyals, and Dean, who have made significant contributions to knowledge distillation and large language models .

The key solution mentioned in the paper involves a process called Dual-Space Knowledge Distillation. This process involves aligning the teacher's embeddings and output hidden states with the student's tokens through query, key, and value vectors. By calculating attention matrices and aligning hidden states between the teacher and student models, the knowledge distillation process occurs in both the student and teacher spaces, facilitating effective learning and model compression .


How were the experiments in the paper designed?

The experiments in the paper were designed to evaluate the Dual-Space Knowledge Distillation (DSKD) framework for Large Language Models (LLMs) through a series of simulations and tests .

  1. Simulation Experiment Design:

    • The experiments involved initializing two sets of 2-D vectors representing the output hidden states of the student and teacher models with different mean values and variances .
    • Two prediction heads were set to produce probability distributions for the student and teacher models based on these vectors .
    • The KL divergence was selected as the distance function for the Knowledge Distillation (KD) process, and simulations were conducted for 1000 iterations to optimize the student's hidden states .
    • The experiments aimed to compare the outcomes of the current white-box KD framework, which uses distributions from different output spaces, with a modified approach that unifies the output spaces of the student and teacher models by sharing the same prediction head .
  2. Experimental Setup:

    • The DSKD framework was evaluated on various instruction-following datasets, including Dolly, Self-Instruction, Vicuna-Evaluation, Super Natural Instructions, and Unnatural Instructions .
    • Different LLM models were selected as students and teachers, such as GPT2-120M, TinyLLaMA-1.1B, GPT2-1.5B, Qwen1.5-1.8B, LLaMA2-7B, and Mistral-7B, with varying vocabularies .
    • Training configurations, including epoch, learning rate, projector learning rate, and batch size, were specified for each model to conduct the KD process .
  3. Evaluation:

    • The performance of the DSKD framework was evaluated based on Rouge-L scores on different benchmarks, comparing the results of KD in the student space, KD in the teacher space, and a combination of both for various distance functions .
    • The experiments aimed to assess the effectiveness of DSKD in enhancing the similarity between student and teacher models by unifying the output spaces and optimizing the hidden states .

Overall, the experiments were meticulously designed to investigate the impact of different approaches to knowledge distillation on the representation similarity between student and teacher models in the context of Large Language Models .


What is the dataset used for quantitative evaluation? Is the code open source?

The dataset used for quantitative evaluation in the study is the databricks-dolly-15k dataset processed by Gu et al. (2023) . The code for the study is open source and publicly available at https://github.com/songmzhang/DSKD .


Do the experiments and results in the paper provide good support for the scientific hypotheses that need to be verified? Please analyze.

The experiments and results presented in the paper provide strong support for the scientific hypotheses that needed verification. The simulations conducted in the study demonstrated that when using different prediction heads for the student and teacher models, the similarity between their hidden states and distributions was limited, leading to sub-optimal similarity . However, when unifying the output spaces by sharing the same prediction head for both models, the student's hidden states became more similar and closer to the teacher's hidden states, indicating a more effective knowledge distillation process .

Furthermore, the study explored various distance functions such as KL divergence, reverse KL divergence, JS divergence, skewed KL divergence, skewed RKL divergence, and adaptive KL divergence. The results consistently showed that regardless of the distance function used, the student model after knowledge distillation had low representation similarity with the teacher model when different prediction heads were employed . This finding underscores the importance of unifying the output spaces to enhance the similarity between the student and teacher models during the knowledge distillation process .

Moreover, the full results of the experiments revealed that knowledge distillation in the student space outperformed vanilla knowledge distillation in different spaces across all distance functions. However, knowledge distillation in the teacher space only led to limited improvement for some distance functions, with KL divergence showing relatively good performance for teacher space knowledge distillation . This detailed analysis further supports the effectiveness of unifying the output spaces by sharing the prediction head for both the student and teacher models to achieve better knowledge distillation results .


What are the contributions of this paper?

The paper "Dual-Space Knowledge Distillation for Large Language Models" makes several contributions:

  • It introduces a novel approach called Dual-Space Knowledge Distillation (DSKD) for large language models, which involves distilling knowledge in both the student and teacher spaces .
  • The paper presents results showing that knowledge distillation (KD) in the student space yields better performance than vanilla KD in different spaces for all distance functions, with KL divergence showing relatively good performance for KD in the teacher space .
  • It highlights the importance of unifying the output spaces by sharing the prediction head for teacher and student models to achieve a more effective knowledge distillation process .
  • The study provides detailed results and comparisons for various distance functions used in the knowledge distillation process, showcasing the impact of different approaches on enhancing the similarity between student and teacher models .
  • Additionally, the paper evaluates the quality of responses using the GPT-4 model and discusses the process of pairwise comparison between responses from different models to mitigate order bias in the evaluation .
  • Overall, the paper contributes to advancing the field of knowledge distillation for large language models by proposing the DSKD approach and providing insights into the effectiveness of different distance functions and shared prediction heads in the distillation process .

What work can be continued in depth?

Work that can be continued in depth typically involves projects or tasks that require further analysis, research, or development. This could include:

  1. Research projects that require more data collection, analysis, and interpretation.
  2. Complex problem-solving tasks that need further exploration and experimentation.
  3. Creative projects such as writing, art, or design that can be refined and expanded upon.
  4. Skill development in areas such as learning a new language, mastering a musical instrument, or honing a craft.
  5. Professional development activities like further education, training, or certifications to deepen expertise in a particular field.

If you have a specific area of work in mind, feel free to provide more details so I can offer more tailored suggestions.

Tables
1
Scan the QR code to ask more questions about the paper
© 2025 Powerdrill. All rights reserved.