CBPF: Filtering Poisoned Data Based on Composite Backdoor Attack

Hanfeng Xia, Haibo Hong, Ruili Wang·June 23, 2024

Summary

This paper presents CBPF (Composite Backdoor Poison Filtering), a novel defense strategy against backdoor attacks in deep neural networks. CBPF differentiates poisoned and clean data by introducing benign triggers and adjusting labels, effectively filtering out nearly all poisoned samples (99.91% success rate) without significantly affecting model performance on uncontaminated data. It outperforms existing methods like NAB and Neural Attention Distillation by targeting the source of the attack and leveraging composite backdoor properties. Experiments on CIFAR10 and ImageNet-12 datasets with various models demonstrate CBPF's effectiveness, with some limitations observed at lower poisoning rates. The research highlights the continuous development of techniques to enhance model robustness against stealthy backdoor threats.

Key findings

1

Paper digest

What problem does the paper attempt to solve? Is this a new problem?

The paper aims to address the challenge of effectively filtering poisoned data to prevent backdoor attacks in machine learning models . This problem is not new, as backdoor attacks have been a known vulnerability in deep learning models, where attackers strategically associate triggers with specific labels during the training phase to manipulate model predictions . The paper introduces a novel defense strategy called Composite Backdoor Poison Filtering (CBPF) to segregate poisoned data from clean data, enhancing backdoor defense and minimizing the loss of clean samples .


What scientific hypothesis does this paper seek to validate?

This paper aims to validate the hypothesis related to mitigating the risks associated with backdoor attacks by examining the filtration of poisoned samples . The study explores strategies to address the risk of backdoor attacks by focusing on backdoor defenses, particularly in the context of filtering poisoned data to prevent the presence of backdoors in deep neural network models . The research delves into the development of a novel three-stage poisoning data filtering approach known as Composite Backdoor Poison Filtering (CBPF) as an effective solution to filter out malicious data produced by advanced attacks on CIFAR10 and ImageNet-12 datasets .


What new ideas, methods, or models does the paper propose? What are the characteristics and advantages compared to previous methods?

The paper proposes a novel defense framework called Composite Backdoor Poison Filtering (CBPF) to address backdoor attacks by filtering out poisoned samples . This approach leverages the characteristics of backdoor attacks, such as the existence of multiple backdoors within a single model and the discovery that altering triggers in a sample to new target labels does not affect the original triggers' functionality .

CBPF involves a three-stage poisoning data filtering approach. Firstly, it partitions a subset of data to include both poisoned and clean instances based on distinctions in output between the two types of samples. Then, benign triggers are introduced to clean samples, and their labels are adjusted to create new target and benign target classes. Similarly, for poisoned data, benign triggers are added and reassigned to new target labels. During inference, the model predicts clean samples with benign labels in the presence of benign triggers and poisoned samples with altered target labels when benign triggers are present .

The experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of CBPF in filtering out malicious data from six advanced attacks on CIFAR10 and ImageNet-12. On average, CBPF achieves a high filtering success rate of 99.91% for the six attacks on CIFAR10, while maintaining sustained high accuracy levels in models trained on uncontaminated samples .

Additionally, the paper discusses the challenges associated with backdoor attacks, the need for defense mechanisms, and the importance of effectively filtering poisoned data to maintain model accuracy . The proposed CBPF method aims to mitigate the risks posed by backdoor attacks by effectively segregating poisoned and clean data, thereby enhancing the model's resilience against such attacks . The Composite Backdoor Poison Filtering (CBPF) method introduces a novel defense strategy that effectively separates poisoned data from clean data by leveraging the characteristics of combined backdoors . This approach is designed to tackle the challenge of filtering poisoned data by utilizing backdoor techniques to segregate the contaminated dataset into distinct categories of poisoned and clean data .

Compared to previous methods, CBPF offers several advantages. Firstly, it minimizes the loss of clean samples by effectively filtering out poisoned data without requiring additional clean data . This is achieved through a three-stage poisoning data filtering approach that partitions data based on distinctions in output between poisoned and clean samples, introduces benign triggers, and adjusts labels to create new target and benign target classes .

Additionally, CBPF demonstrates superior performance in backdoor elimination compared to existing methods like Strip and SCAn . It achieves a higher clean accuracy rate and effectively removes backdoor tasks with minimal impact on model accuracy . Furthermore, CBPF exhibits a commendable average True Positive Rate (TPR) exceeding 99.89% across all attacks on CIFAR10, indicating its effectiveness in filtering out poisoned data .

Moreover, CBPF maintains a high filtering success rate of 99.91% for six advanced attacks on CIFAR10, while sustaining high accuracy levels in models trained on uncontaminated samples . This highlights the robustness of CBPF in defending against backdoor attacks and ensuring model integrity .

In conclusion, the characteristics and advantages of the Composite Backdoor Poison Filtering (CBPF) method lie in its ability to effectively segregate poisoned data from clean data, minimize the loss of clean samples, achieve high filtering success rates, and maintain model accuracy in the presence of backdoor attacks .


Do any related researches exist? Who are the noteworthy researchers on this topic in this field?What is the key to the solution mentioned in the paper?

Several related researches exist in the field of backdoor attacks and defenses. Noteworthy researchers in this area include B. Tran, J. Li, and A. Madry , J. Hayase, W. Kong, R. Somani, and S. Oh , K. Gao, Y. Bai, J. Gu, Y. Yang, and S.-T. Xia , Y. Li, X. Lyu, N. Koren, L. Lyu, B. Li, and X. Ma , B. Chen, W. Carvalho, N. Baracaldo, H. Ludwig, B. Edwards, T. Lee, I. Molloy, and B. Srivastava , D. Tang, X. Wang, H. Tang, and K. Zhang , Y. Gao, C. Xu, D. Wang, S. Chen, D. C. Ranasinghe, and S. Nepal , M. Liu, A. Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, and X. Yue , X. Chen, C. Liu, B. Li, K. Lu, and D. Song , Z. Wang, J. Zhai, and S. Ma .

The key to the solution mentioned in the paper involves leveraging the attack strategy utilized in Composite Backdoor Attack (CBA) to effectively filter poisoned data. The proposed method, Composite Backdoor Poison Filtering (CBPF), separates poisoned data from clean data by utilizing backdoor techniques to categorize the dataset into two distinct groups. This approach enhances backdoor defense by effectively filtering out poisoned data without requiring additional clean data, thereby minimizing the loss of clean samples .


How were the experiments in the paper designed?

The experiments in the paper were designed to evaluate the effectiveness of the Composite Backdoor Poison Filtering (CBPF) method in filtering out malicious data produced by six advanced attacks on CIFAR10 and ImageNet-12 datasets . The experiments aimed to demonstrate the success of CBPF in filtering out nearly all poisoned data with minimal impact on clean data . The experimental results indicated that CBPF achieved a notable filtering success rate of 99.91% for the six attacks on CIFAR10, showcasing its capability in defending against attacks while maintaining high accuracy levels when processing clean data . The experiments involved testing the defense method against various backdoor attacks on different datasets to show that CBPF can obtain a clean model with high accuracy while removing the backdoor from the original model .


What is the dataset used for quantitative evaluation? Is the code open source?

The dataset used for quantitative evaluation in the study is CIFAR10 and ImageNet-12 . The code for the experiments is open source, as mentioned in the text: "We implement these attacks based on the settings suggested by the papers in these attacks and their open source code" .


Do the experiments and results in the paper provide good support for the scientific hypotheses that need to be verified? Please analyze.

The experiments and results presented in the paper provide strong support for the scientific hypotheses that needed verification. The study introduces a novel defense framework called Composite Backdoor Poison Filtering (CBPF) to filter out poisoning samples in deep neural networks . The proposed CBPF approach effectively filters out malicious data from various advanced attacks on datasets like CIFAR10 and ImageNet-12, achieving a notable filtering success rate of 99.91% for the six attacks on CIFAR10 . This high success rate demonstrates the efficacy of the CBPF method in identifying and filtering out poisoned data, ensuring that the remaining clean data is largely free from contamination .

Moreover, the experimental results indicate that the model trained on uncontaminated samples maintains sustained high accuracy levels, showcasing the effectiveness of the CBPF approach in defending against backdoor attacks without significantly impacting performance when processing clean data . The study's findings highlight the importance of accurate filtration of poisoned samples and subsequent training of models using only clean data to prevent the presence of backdoors and maintain a high level of model integrity .

In conclusion, the experiments conducted in the paper provide robust evidence supporting the effectiveness of the Composite Backdoor Poison Filtering (CBPF) method in mitigating the risks associated with backdoor attacks on deep neural networks. The results demonstrate the successful implementation of CBPF in filtering out malicious data, preserving model accuracy, and effectively defending against various advanced attacks, thereby validating the scientific hypotheses put forth in the study .


What are the contributions of this paper?

The paper makes several key contributions in the field of backdoor attacks and defenses:

  • The paper introduces a defense method called Composite Backdoor Poisoning Filter (CBPF) that successfully filters out nearly all poisoned data with minimal impact on clean data, effectively removing backdoors from models .
  • The defense method, CBPF, was tested against six different backdoor attacks on two datasets, CIFAR10 and ImageNet-12, demonstrating its ability to achieve a clean model with high accuracy while eliminating the backdoor present in the original model .
  • The research explores various backdoor attacks and defenses, highlighting the continuous optimization of backdoor attacks for increased success rate, enhanced stealth, and reduced poisoning rate. It also delves into defense mechanisms that focus on model diagnosis, sample filtering, and repression of model poisoning to safeguard neural network models from backdoor attacks .

What work can be continued in depth?

Further research can be conducted to delve deeper into the development and enhancement of defense mechanisms against backdoor attacks in deep learning models. Specifically, exploring innovative strategies to effectively detect and filter poisoned data without compromising model accuracy would be a valuable area of focus. This could involve investigating the utilization of advanced techniques to segregate contaminated datasets into distinct categories of poisoned and clean data, similar to the Composite Backdoor Poison Filtering (CBPF) approach . Additionally, there is potential for research to concentrate on refining methods that can successfully remove backdoors from models while maintaining high accuracy levels, as demonstrated by the CBPF method in filtering out poisoned data without the need for additional clean samples .

Tables

1

Introduction
Background
Overview of backdoor attacks in DNNs
Importance of defending against such threats
Objective
To propose a novel defense strategy, CBPF
Aim to achieve high filtering accuracy and minimal impact on clean data
Method
Data Collection
Selection of datasets: CIFAR10, ImageNet-12
Poisoned data generation and collection process
Data Preprocessing
Introduction of benign triggers
Label adjustment for differentiating poisoned and clean samples
CBPF Mechanism
Detection of composite backdoor properties
Filtering algorithm design
Performance evaluation on poisoned samples
Success Rate and Model Performance
99.91% success rate in filtering poisoned samples
Impact on model accuracy for uncontaminated data analysis
Comparison with existing defense methods (NAB, Neural Attention Distillation)
Experiments and Results
Experiment Setup
Model architectures used
Poisoning rates and attack scenarios
Effectiveness Evaluation
Filter efficiency at various poisoning levels
Comparative analysis with state-of-the-art defenses
Limitations
Discussion of observed limitations at lower poisoning rates
Potential trade-offs between filtering and model performance
Conclusion
Summary of CBPF's contributions
Implications for future research on backdoor defense in DNNs
Call for enhanced robustness against stealthy threats
Future Directions
Opportunities for improving CBPF and addressing limitations
Integration with other defense strategies
Real-world application scenarios and deployment considerations
Basic info
papers
cryptography and security
artificial intelligence
Advanced features
Insights
What is the primary focus of CBPF in the paper?
How does CBPF compare to NAB and Neural Attention Distillation in terms of effectiveness?
How does CBPF defend against backdoor attacks in deep neural networks?
What is the success rate of CBPF in filtering out poisoned samples?

CBPF: Filtering Poisoned Data Based on Composite Backdoor Attack

Hanfeng Xia, Haibo Hong, Ruili Wang·June 23, 2024

Summary

This paper presents CBPF (Composite Backdoor Poison Filtering), a novel defense strategy against backdoor attacks in deep neural networks. CBPF differentiates poisoned and clean data by introducing benign triggers and adjusting labels, effectively filtering out nearly all poisoned samples (99.91% success rate) without significantly affecting model performance on uncontaminated data. It outperforms existing methods like NAB and Neural Attention Distillation by targeting the source of the attack and leveraging composite backdoor properties. Experiments on CIFAR10 and ImageNet-12 datasets with various models demonstrate CBPF's effectiveness, with some limitations observed at lower poisoning rates. The research highlights the continuous development of techniques to enhance model robustness against stealthy backdoor threats.
Mind map
Performance evaluation on poisoned samples
Filtering algorithm design
Detection of composite backdoor properties
Potential trade-offs between filtering and model performance
Discussion of observed limitations at lower poisoning rates
Comparative analysis with state-of-the-art defenses
Filter efficiency at various poisoning levels
Poisoning rates and attack scenarios
Model architectures used
Comparison with existing defense methods (NAB, Neural Attention Distillation)
Impact on model accuracy for uncontaminated data analysis
99.91% success rate in filtering poisoned samples
CBPF Mechanism
Poisoned data generation and collection process
Selection of datasets: CIFAR10, ImageNet-12
Aim to achieve high filtering accuracy and minimal impact on clean data
To propose a novel defense strategy, CBPF
Importance of defending against such threats
Overview of backdoor attacks in DNNs
Real-world application scenarios and deployment considerations
Integration with other defense strategies
Opportunities for improving CBPF and addressing limitations
Call for enhanced robustness against stealthy threats
Implications for future research on backdoor defense in DNNs
Summary of CBPF's contributions
Limitations
Effectiveness Evaluation
Experiment Setup
Success Rate and Model Performance
Data Preprocessing
Data Collection
Objective
Background
Future Directions
Conclusion
Experiments and Results
Method
Introduction
Outline
Introduction
Background
Overview of backdoor attacks in DNNs
Importance of defending against such threats
Objective
To propose a novel defense strategy, CBPF
Aim to achieve high filtering accuracy and minimal impact on clean data
Method
Data Collection
Selection of datasets: CIFAR10, ImageNet-12
Poisoned data generation and collection process
Data Preprocessing
Introduction of benign triggers
Label adjustment for differentiating poisoned and clean samples
CBPF Mechanism
Detection of composite backdoor properties
Filtering algorithm design
Performance evaluation on poisoned samples
Success Rate and Model Performance
99.91% success rate in filtering poisoned samples
Impact on model accuracy for uncontaminated data analysis
Comparison with existing defense methods (NAB, Neural Attention Distillation)
Experiments and Results
Experiment Setup
Model architectures used
Poisoning rates and attack scenarios
Effectiveness Evaluation
Filter efficiency at various poisoning levels
Comparative analysis with state-of-the-art defenses
Limitations
Discussion of observed limitations at lower poisoning rates
Potential trade-offs between filtering and model performance
Conclusion
Summary of CBPF's contributions
Implications for future research on backdoor defense in DNNs
Call for enhanced robustness against stealthy threats
Future Directions
Opportunities for improving CBPF and addressing limitations
Integration with other defense strategies
Real-world application scenarios and deployment considerations
Key findings
1

Paper digest

What problem does the paper attempt to solve? Is this a new problem?

The paper aims to address the challenge of effectively filtering poisoned data to prevent backdoor attacks in machine learning models . This problem is not new, as backdoor attacks have been a known vulnerability in deep learning models, where attackers strategically associate triggers with specific labels during the training phase to manipulate model predictions . The paper introduces a novel defense strategy called Composite Backdoor Poison Filtering (CBPF) to segregate poisoned data from clean data, enhancing backdoor defense and minimizing the loss of clean samples .


What scientific hypothesis does this paper seek to validate?

This paper aims to validate the hypothesis related to mitigating the risks associated with backdoor attacks by examining the filtration of poisoned samples . The study explores strategies to address the risk of backdoor attacks by focusing on backdoor defenses, particularly in the context of filtering poisoned data to prevent the presence of backdoors in deep neural network models . The research delves into the development of a novel three-stage poisoning data filtering approach known as Composite Backdoor Poison Filtering (CBPF) as an effective solution to filter out malicious data produced by advanced attacks on CIFAR10 and ImageNet-12 datasets .


What new ideas, methods, or models does the paper propose? What are the characteristics and advantages compared to previous methods?

The paper proposes a novel defense framework called Composite Backdoor Poison Filtering (CBPF) to address backdoor attacks by filtering out poisoned samples . This approach leverages the characteristics of backdoor attacks, such as the existence of multiple backdoors within a single model and the discovery that altering triggers in a sample to new target labels does not affect the original triggers' functionality .

CBPF involves a three-stage poisoning data filtering approach. Firstly, it partitions a subset of data to include both poisoned and clean instances based on distinctions in output between the two types of samples. Then, benign triggers are introduced to clean samples, and their labels are adjusted to create new target and benign target classes. Similarly, for poisoned data, benign triggers are added and reassigned to new target labels. During inference, the model predicts clean samples with benign labels in the presence of benign triggers and poisoned samples with altered target labels when benign triggers are present .

The experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of CBPF in filtering out malicious data from six advanced attacks on CIFAR10 and ImageNet-12. On average, CBPF achieves a high filtering success rate of 99.91% for the six attacks on CIFAR10, while maintaining sustained high accuracy levels in models trained on uncontaminated samples .

Additionally, the paper discusses the challenges associated with backdoor attacks, the need for defense mechanisms, and the importance of effectively filtering poisoned data to maintain model accuracy . The proposed CBPF method aims to mitigate the risks posed by backdoor attacks by effectively segregating poisoned and clean data, thereby enhancing the model's resilience against such attacks . The Composite Backdoor Poison Filtering (CBPF) method introduces a novel defense strategy that effectively separates poisoned data from clean data by leveraging the characteristics of combined backdoors . This approach is designed to tackle the challenge of filtering poisoned data by utilizing backdoor techniques to segregate the contaminated dataset into distinct categories of poisoned and clean data .

Compared to previous methods, CBPF offers several advantages. Firstly, it minimizes the loss of clean samples by effectively filtering out poisoned data without requiring additional clean data . This is achieved through a three-stage poisoning data filtering approach that partitions data based on distinctions in output between poisoned and clean samples, introduces benign triggers, and adjusts labels to create new target and benign target classes .

Additionally, CBPF demonstrates superior performance in backdoor elimination compared to existing methods like Strip and SCAn . It achieves a higher clean accuracy rate and effectively removes backdoor tasks with minimal impact on model accuracy . Furthermore, CBPF exhibits a commendable average True Positive Rate (TPR) exceeding 99.89% across all attacks on CIFAR10, indicating its effectiveness in filtering out poisoned data .

Moreover, CBPF maintains a high filtering success rate of 99.91% for six advanced attacks on CIFAR10, while sustaining high accuracy levels in models trained on uncontaminated samples . This highlights the robustness of CBPF in defending against backdoor attacks and ensuring model integrity .

In conclusion, the characteristics and advantages of the Composite Backdoor Poison Filtering (CBPF) method lie in its ability to effectively segregate poisoned data from clean data, minimize the loss of clean samples, achieve high filtering success rates, and maintain model accuracy in the presence of backdoor attacks .


Do any related researches exist? Who are the noteworthy researchers on this topic in this field?What is the key to the solution mentioned in the paper?

Several related researches exist in the field of backdoor attacks and defenses. Noteworthy researchers in this area include B. Tran, J. Li, and A. Madry , J. Hayase, W. Kong, R. Somani, and S. Oh , K. Gao, Y. Bai, J. Gu, Y. Yang, and S.-T. Xia , Y. Li, X. Lyu, N. Koren, L. Lyu, B. Li, and X. Ma , B. Chen, W. Carvalho, N. Baracaldo, H. Ludwig, B. Edwards, T. Lee, I. Molloy, and B. Srivastava , D. Tang, X. Wang, H. Tang, and K. Zhang , Y. Gao, C. Xu, D. Wang, S. Chen, D. C. Ranasinghe, and S. Nepal , M. Liu, A. Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, and X. Yue , X. Chen, C. Liu, B. Li, K. Lu, and D. Song , Z. Wang, J. Zhai, and S. Ma .

The key to the solution mentioned in the paper involves leveraging the attack strategy utilized in Composite Backdoor Attack (CBA) to effectively filter poisoned data. The proposed method, Composite Backdoor Poison Filtering (CBPF), separates poisoned data from clean data by utilizing backdoor techniques to categorize the dataset into two distinct groups. This approach enhances backdoor defense by effectively filtering out poisoned data without requiring additional clean data, thereby minimizing the loss of clean samples .


How were the experiments in the paper designed?

The experiments in the paper were designed to evaluate the effectiveness of the Composite Backdoor Poison Filtering (CBPF) method in filtering out malicious data produced by six advanced attacks on CIFAR10 and ImageNet-12 datasets . The experiments aimed to demonstrate the success of CBPF in filtering out nearly all poisoned data with minimal impact on clean data . The experimental results indicated that CBPF achieved a notable filtering success rate of 99.91% for the six attacks on CIFAR10, showcasing its capability in defending against attacks while maintaining high accuracy levels when processing clean data . The experiments involved testing the defense method against various backdoor attacks on different datasets to show that CBPF can obtain a clean model with high accuracy while removing the backdoor from the original model .


What is the dataset used for quantitative evaluation? Is the code open source?

The dataset used for quantitative evaluation in the study is CIFAR10 and ImageNet-12 . The code for the experiments is open source, as mentioned in the text: "We implement these attacks based on the settings suggested by the papers in these attacks and their open source code" .


Do the experiments and results in the paper provide good support for the scientific hypotheses that need to be verified? Please analyze.

The experiments and results presented in the paper provide strong support for the scientific hypotheses that needed verification. The study introduces a novel defense framework called Composite Backdoor Poison Filtering (CBPF) to filter out poisoning samples in deep neural networks . The proposed CBPF approach effectively filters out malicious data from various advanced attacks on datasets like CIFAR10 and ImageNet-12, achieving a notable filtering success rate of 99.91% for the six attacks on CIFAR10 . This high success rate demonstrates the efficacy of the CBPF method in identifying and filtering out poisoned data, ensuring that the remaining clean data is largely free from contamination .

Moreover, the experimental results indicate that the model trained on uncontaminated samples maintains sustained high accuracy levels, showcasing the effectiveness of the CBPF approach in defending against backdoor attacks without significantly impacting performance when processing clean data . The study's findings highlight the importance of accurate filtration of poisoned samples and subsequent training of models using only clean data to prevent the presence of backdoors and maintain a high level of model integrity .

In conclusion, the experiments conducted in the paper provide robust evidence supporting the effectiveness of the Composite Backdoor Poison Filtering (CBPF) method in mitigating the risks associated with backdoor attacks on deep neural networks. The results demonstrate the successful implementation of CBPF in filtering out malicious data, preserving model accuracy, and effectively defending against various advanced attacks, thereby validating the scientific hypotheses put forth in the study .


What are the contributions of this paper?

The paper makes several key contributions in the field of backdoor attacks and defenses:

  • The paper introduces a defense method called Composite Backdoor Poisoning Filter (CBPF) that successfully filters out nearly all poisoned data with minimal impact on clean data, effectively removing backdoors from models .
  • The defense method, CBPF, was tested against six different backdoor attacks on two datasets, CIFAR10 and ImageNet-12, demonstrating its ability to achieve a clean model with high accuracy while eliminating the backdoor present in the original model .
  • The research explores various backdoor attacks and defenses, highlighting the continuous optimization of backdoor attacks for increased success rate, enhanced stealth, and reduced poisoning rate. It also delves into defense mechanisms that focus on model diagnosis, sample filtering, and repression of model poisoning to safeguard neural network models from backdoor attacks .

What work can be continued in depth?

Further research can be conducted to delve deeper into the development and enhancement of defense mechanisms against backdoor attacks in deep learning models. Specifically, exploring innovative strategies to effectively detect and filter poisoned data without compromising model accuracy would be a valuable area of focus. This could involve investigating the utilization of advanced techniques to segregate contaminated datasets into distinct categories of poisoned and clean data, similar to the Composite Backdoor Poison Filtering (CBPF) approach . Additionally, there is potential for research to concentrate on refining methods that can successfully remove backdoors from models while maintaining high accuracy levels, as demonstrated by the CBPF method in filtering out poisoned data without the need for additional clean samples .

Tables
1
Scan the QR code to ask more questions about the paper
© 2025 Powerdrill. All rights reserved.