BEACON: Balancing Convenience and Nutrition in Meals With Long-Term Group Recommendations and Reasoning on Multimodal Recipes

Vansh Nagpal, Siva Likitha Valluru, Kausik Lakkaraju, Biplav Srivastava·June 19, 2024

Summary

BEACON is a data-driven meal recommendation system that balances convenience and nutrition by considering user preferences, dietary conditions, and fast food recipes. It converts recipes into a structured R3 format, evaluates recommendations using novel metrics, and compares its effectiveness to baselines. The system is designed for various users, including those with specific dietary needs, and employs GPT-3.5 and LLMs for recipe processing. BEACON introduces a study comparing three recommendation methods, with the bandit algorithm (M2) showing the best performance in meeting user preferences and diversity. Future work involves improving recipe representation, expanding features, and developing a user-facing app. The research highlights the potential of technology in enhancing meal planning and promoting healthier habits.

Key findings

2

Paper digest

What problem does the paper attempt to solve? Is this a new problem?

The paper aims to address the novel problem of meal recommendation, focusing on balancing convenience and nutrition over long periods by providing recommendations for meal configurations and time horizons . This problem involves guiding individuals in making healthy meal choices while considering factors like dietary preferences, health conditions, and nutritional requirements . The paper introduces the BEACON system to tackle this issue, emphasizing the importance of exploring a variety of foods while maintaining a balance between nutritious choices and convenience . While there are existing food recommendation systems in literature, the specific problem of long-term meal recommendation with a focus on balancing convenience and nutrition is relatively new and forms a significant contribution of this paper .


What scientific hypothesis does this paper seek to validate?

This paper seeks to validate the scientific hypothesis that by leveraging data from online recipes, domain knowledge about meals, and user preferences, a data-driven approach can be used to recommend meals that balance convenience and nutrition over long periods, nudging individuals towards healthy choices . The study introduces the BEACON system to address the meal recommendation problem, focusing on food choices, meal configurations, and long time horizons . The research aims to provide a solution that explores and balances choices for both nutritious and convenient meal options while also reasoning about the constituents of food and the cooking process .


What new ideas, methods, or models does the paper propose? What are the characteristics and advantages compared to previous methods?

The paper "BEACON: Balancing Convenience and Nutrition in Meals With Long-Term Group Recommendations and Reasoning on Multimodal Recipes" proposes several innovative ideas, methods, and models in the field of meal recommendation systems . Here are the key contributions of the paper:

  1. BEACON System: The paper introduces the BEACON system, which aims to provide meal recommendations over long periods by considering different meal configurations and time horizons . This system leverages data from online recipes, domain knowledge about meals, and user preferences to guide individuals towards healthy food choices while allowing exploration of a variety of foods .

  2. R3 Food Recipe Set: The paper presents the R3 Food Recipe Set (R) as part of the inputs processed by BEACON . This dataset consists of non-fast food and fast food items represented in the R3 format, which includes information about food content and preparation process .

  3. Recommendation Methods:

    • M0, M1, M2 Approaches: The paper introduces three recommendation methods - M0, M1, and M2 .
      • M0: Recommends meals without specific criteria, exposing users to diverse food choices.
      • M1: Sequentially recommends meals from a dataset of recipes, avoiding repetitive randomness.
      • M2: Incorporates user preferences, dietary restrictions, allergen information, and item roles to provide highly personalized meal recommendations using contextual bandits and reinforcement learning .
  4. Evaluation Metrics: The paper introduces novel quantitative and qualitative metrics to evaluate the meal recommendations generated by the BEACON system . These metrics assess the quality of recommendations based on factors like duplicates, coverage, and user constraint satisfaction .

  5. Boosted Bandit Method: The paper demonstrates the efficacy of the boosted bandit method for generating robust meal recommendations across different user configurations and time frames . This method is used to address the problem of meal recommendation within the BEACON system .

In summary, the paper proposes a comprehensive approach to meal recommendation systems by introducing the BEACON system, innovative recommendation methods, a unique dataset, and effective evaluation metrics to guide users towards healthy and personalized food choices over extended time periods . The paper "BEACON: Balancing Convenience and Nutrition in Meals With Long-Term Group Recommendations and Reasoning on Multimodal Recipes" introduces several characteristics and advantages compared to previous methods in meal recommendation systems:

  1. Characteristics:

    • BEACON System: BEACON incorporates user preferences, dietary restrictions, allergen information, and item roles into the meal recommendation process, providing highly personalized meal recommendations using contextual bandits and reinforcement learning .
    • Recommendation Methods: The paper introduces three recommendation methods - M0, M1, and M2. M2, in particular, represents a significant advancement by incorporating user preferences and continuously learning to provide personalized recommendations over time .
    • Evaluation Metrics: The paper introduces novel quantitative and qualitative metrics to evaluate meal recommendations, including user constraint, duplicate meal, and meal coverage metrics, to assess the quality of recommendations .
    • Boosted Bandit Method: The paper demonstrates the efficacy of the boosted bandit method for generating robust meal recommendations across different user configurations and time frames .
  2. Advantages Compared to Previous Methods:

    • Personalization: Unlike previous methods, M2 in BEACON offers highly personalized meal recommendations by considering user preferences, dietary restrictions, and allergen information, leading to more tailored and relevant suggestions .
    • Continuous Learning: BEACON's M2 method continuously learns and improves its recommendations over time as more data is provided, making it a dynamic and evolving system compared to static recommendation approaches .
    • Improved Performance: The bandit algorithm in BEACON outperforms other methods in user constraint and meal coverage metrics, showcasing its effectiveness in providing informed recommendations based on user preferences and constraints .
    • Diverse Food Choices: The M0 method in BEACON introduces users to a diverse array of food choices without specific criteria, broadening their culinary experiences compared to more structured approaches .

In conclusion, the BEACON system stands out for its personalized recommendations, continuous learning capabilities, improved performance metrics, and the ability to offer diverse food choices to users, setting it apart from traditional meal recommendation methods .


Do any related researches exist? Who are the noteworthy researchers on this topic in this field?What is the key to the solution mentioned in the paper?

Several related research studies exist in the field of meal recommendations and nutrition. Noteworthy researchers in this area include Vansh Nagpal, Siva Likitha Valluru, Kausik Lakkaraju, and Biplav Srivastava . These researchers have worked on developing the BEACON system, which focuses on balancing convenience and nutrition in meals with long-term group recommendations and reasoning on multimodal recipes .

The key to the solution mentioned in the paper involves addressing the meal recommendation problem over long periods by providing users with food choices over meal configurations and long time horizons. The BEACON system introduces a novel meal recommendation problem, utilizes multimodal R3 format for recipe representations, and evaluates the recommendations based on quantitative and qualitative metrics such as duplicates, coverage, and user constraint satisfaction .


How were the experiments in the paper designed?

The experiments in the paper were designed with specific configurations and metrics to evaluate the performance of different algorithms for meal recommendations . Three different methods were used to recommend meals to users:

  • M0: Random/Baseline
  • M1: Sequential
  • M2: Relational Boosted Bandit . Each experiment displayed three metrics: user constraint (𝑢𝑐), duplicate meal (𝑑𝑚), and meal coverage (𝑚𝑐), along with various combinations calculated as averages . The bandit algorithm outperformed other methods in the user constraint metric and meal coverage metric, showing superior performance due to being the most informed out of the three algorithms . The experiments also considered different user preferences towards food features, with varying numbers of users having positive, negative, or neutral preferences, leading to decreasing user constraints across the configurations .

What is the dataset used for quantitative evaluation? Is the code open source?

The dataset used for quantitative evaluation in the study is the BEACON dataset, which consists of 50 R3 items comprising non-fast food and fast food items like Taco Bell and McDonald's . The code for the study is not explicitly mentioned to be open source in the provided context.


Do the experiments and results in the paper provide good support for the scientific hypotheses that need to be verified? Please analyze.

The experiments and results presented in the paper provide strong support for the scientific hypotheses that needed verification. The study conducted experiments using different algorithms, including bandit, sequential, and random, to evaluate the performance of the recommendation system in terms of user constraint, duplicate meal, and meal coverage metrics . The results indicated that the bandit algorithm outperformed the other methods in user constraint and meal coverage metrics, showcasing its effectiveness and informativeness . Additionally, the study carefully analyzed the performance of each algorithm across various user preferences configurations, demonstrating a systematic approach to hypothesis testing and evaluation .

Furthermore, the paper introduced a novel meal recommendation problem and the BEACON system to address the challenge of recommending meals over extended periods while considering user preferences and dietary constraints . By adopting a multimodal recipe representation format and converting fast food recipes into this format, the study showcased a comprehensive approach to meal recommendation that integrates both food content and preparation processes . This holistic methodology aligns with the scientific hypotheses of providing balanced and nutritious meal recommendations to users .

Overall, the experiments, results, and methodologies outlined in the paper offer robust support for the scientific hypotheses under investigation. The systematic evaluation of different algorithms, the introduction of a novel meal recommendation system, and the integration of multimodal recipe representations collectively contribute to the validation of the scientific hypotheses related to balancing convenience and nutrition in meal recommendations .


What are the contributions of this paper?

The paper "BEACON: Balancing Convenience and Nutrition in Meals With Long-Term Group Recommendations and Reasoning on Multimodal Recipes" makes several key contributions:

  1. Introduces the novel meal recommendation problem that involves food choices over meal configurations and long time horizons .
  2. Presents the BEACON system to address the challenge of meal recommendation over extended periods and provides a case study to demonstrate its utility .
  3. Adopts the multimodal R3 format and converts fast food recipes from popular chains like Taco Bell and McDonald’s into R3 representations using Large Language Models (LLMs) augmented with human supervision .
  4. Introduces novel quantitative and qualitative metrics to evaluate recommendations, measuring duplicates, coverage, and user constraint satisfaction .
  5. Demonstrates the effectiveness of the meal recommendations compared to appropriate baselines .

What work can be continued in depth?

To further enhance the existing work on meal recommendations and nutrition, several avenues for future exploration can be considered :

  • Implementing a more automated approach to generate recipe representations to expand the dataset, leading to more robust models.
  • Increasing the number of features related to ingredients and allergens to provide diverse recommendations catering to users with different dietary needs.
  • Experimenting with various recommendation algorithms and methods to explore the utilization of R3 representations effectively.
  • Developing an application that allows users to input preferences and receive tailored recommendations.
  • Conducting qualitative evaluations to demonstrate the acceptance and effectiveness of the recommendation system.

Introduction
Background
Fast food culture and growing demand for healthier options
The role of technology in personal nutrition and meal planning
Objective
To develop a system that balances convenience and nutrition
Evaluate the effectiveness of BEACON compared to baselines
Promote healthier habits through personalized meal recommendations
Method
Data Collection
Recipe data from various sources
User preferences and dietary information
Fast food recipe conversion into R3 format
Data Preprocessing
Standardization and cleaning of recipe data
Integration of user profiles and dietary restrictions
Feature extraction for recipe representation
Recommendation Algorithms
Baselines
Rule-based system
Popular dishes
Random selection (M1)
BEACON's Approach
Bandit algorithm (M2) for personalized recommendations
Evaluation using novel metrics (diversity, user satisfaction)
GPT-3.5 and LLMs
Recipe processing and understanding
Integration into the recommendation engine
Study Design
Performance Comparison
M2 vs. baseline methods
Metrics: preference satisfaction, diversity, and user engagement
User Segmentation
Testing with diverse user groups, including specific dietary needs
Results and Discussion
M2's superiority in meeting user needs
Challenges and limitations of the current system
Lessons learned for recipe representation and feature expansion
Future Work
Improving recipe representation using advanced NLP techniques
Expanding feature set for enhanced personalization
Development of a user-facing BEACON app
Conclusion
The potential of technology in promoting healthier meal choices
Implications for public health and nutrition education
Basic info
papers
computation and language
artificial intelligence
Advanced features
Insights
What are some potential future developments for BEACON mentioned in the user input?
Which algorithm demonstrated the best performance in the study for meeting user preferences and diversity in BEACON?
What is BEACON and what does it aim to achieve in meal recommendations?
How does BEACON consider user preferences and dietary restrictions when suggesting meals?

BEACON: Balancing Convenience and Nutrition in Meals With Long-Term Group Recommendations and Reasoning on Multimodal Recipes

Vansh Nagpal, Siva Likitha Valluru, Kausik Lakkaraju, Biplav Srivastava·June 19, 2024

Summary

BEACON is a data-driven meal recommendation system that balances convenience and nutrition by considering user preferences, dietary conditions, and fast food recipes. It converts recipes into a structured R3 format, evaluates recommendations using novel metrics, and compares its effectiveness to baselines. The system is designed for various users, including those with specific dietary needs, and employs GPT-3.5 and LLMs for recipe processing. BEACON introduces a study comparing three recommendation methods, with the bandit algorithm (M2) showing the best performance in meeting user preferences and diversity. Future work involves improving recipe representation, expanding features, and developing a user-facing app. The research highlights the potential of technology in enhancing meal planning and promoting healthier habits.
Mind map
Evaluation using novel metrics (diversity, user satisfaction)
Bandit algorithm (M2) for personalized recommendations
Random selection (M1)
Popular dishes
Rule-based system
Testing with diverse user groups, including specific dietary needs
Metrics: preference satisfaction, diversity, and user engagement
M2 vs. baseline methods
Integration into the recommendation engine
Recipe processing and understanding
BEACON's Approach
Baselines
Feature extraction for recipe representation
Integration of user profiles and dietary restrictions
Standardization and cleaning of recipe data
Fast food recipe conversion into R3 format
User preferences and dietary information
Recipe data from various sources
Promote healthier habits through personalized meal recommendations
Evaluate the effectiveness of BEACON compared to baselines
To develop a system that balances convenience and nutrition
The role of technology in personal nutrition and meal planning
Fast food culture and growing demand for healthier options
Implications for public health and nutrition education
The potential of technology in promoting healthier meal choices
Development of a user-facing BEACON app
Expanding feature set for enhanced personalization
Improving recipe representation using advanced NLP techniques
Lessons learned for recipe representation and feature expansion
Challenges and limitations of the current system
M2's superiority in meeting user needs
User Segmentation
Performance Comparison
GPT-3.5 and LLMs
Recommendation Algorithms
Data Preprocessing
Data Collection
Objective
Background
Conclusion
Future Work
Results and Discussion
Study Design
Method
Introduction
Outline
Introduction
Background
Fast food culture and growing demand for healthier options
The role of technology in personal nutrition and meal planning
Objective
To develop a system that balances convenience and nutrition
Evaluate the effectiveness of BEACON compared to baselines
Promote healthier habits through personalized meal recommendations
Method
Data Collection
Recipe data from various sources
User preferences and dietary information
Fast food recipe conversion into R3 format
Data Preprocessing
Standardization and cleaning of recipe data
Integration of user profiles and dietary restrictions
Feature extraction for recipe representation
Recommendation Algorithms
Baselines
Rule-based system
Popular dishes
Random selection (M1)
BEACON's Approach
Bandit algorithm (M2) for personalized recommendations
Evaluation using novel metrics (diversity, user satisfaction)
GPT-3.5 and LLMs
Recipe processing and understanding
Integration into the recommendation engine
Study Design
Performance Comparison
M2 vs. baseline methods
Metrics: preference satisfaction, diversity, and user engagement
User Segmentation
Testing with diverse user groups, including specific dietary needs
Results and Discussion
M2's superiority in meeting user needs
Challenges and limitations of the current system
Lessons learned for recipe representation and feature expansion
Future Work
Improving recipe representation using advanced NLP techniques
Expanding feature set for enhanced personalization
Development of a user-facing BEACON app
Conclusion
The potential of technology in promoting healthier meal choices
Implications for public health and nutrition education
Key findings
2

Paper digest

What problem does the paper attempt to solve? Is this a new problem?

The paper aims to address the novel problem of meal recommendation, focusing on balancing convenience and nutrition over long periods by providing recommendations for meal configurations and time horizons . This problem involves guiding individuals in making healthy meal choices while considering factors like dietary preferences, health conditions, and nutritional requirements . The paper introduces the BEACON system to tackle this issue, emphasizing the importance of exploring a variety of foods while maintaining a balance between nutritious choices and convenience . While there are existing food recommendation systems in literature, the specific problem of long-term meal recommendation with a focus on balancing convenience and nutrition is relatively new and forms a significant contribution of this paper .


What scientific hypothesis does this paper seek to validate?

This paper seeks to validate the scientific hypothesis that by leveraging data from online recipes, domain knowledge about meals, and user preferences, a data-driven approach can be used to recommend meals that balance convenience and nutrition over long periods, nudging individuals towards healthy choices . The study introduces the BEACON system to address the meal recommendation problem, focusing on food choices, meal configurations, and long time horizons . The research aims to provide a solution that explores and balances choices for both nutritious and convenient meal options while also reasoning about the constituents of food and the cooking process .


What new ideas, methods, or models does the paper propose? What are the characteristics and advantages compared to previous methods?

The paper "BEACON: Balancing Convenience and Nutrition in Meals With Long-Term Group Recommendations and Reasoning on Multimodal Recipes" proposes several innovative ideas, methods, and models in the field of meal recommendation systems . Here are the key contributions of the paper:

  1. BEACON System: The paper introduces the BEACON system, which aims to provide meal recommendations over long periods by considering different meal configurations and time horizons . This system leverages data from online recipes, domain knowledge about meals, and user preferences to guide individuals towards healthy food choices while allowing exploration of a variety of foods .

  2. R3 Food Recipe Set: The paper presents the R3 Food Recipe Set (R) as part of the inputs processed by BEACON . This dataset consists of non-fast food and fast food items represented in the R3 format, which includes information about food content and preparation process .

  3. Recommendation Methods:

    • M0, M1, M2 Approaches: The paper introduces three recommendation methods - M0, M1, and M2 .
      • M0: Recommends meals without specific criteria, exposing users to diverse food choices.
      • M1: Sequentially recommends meals from a dataset of recipes, avoiding repetitive randomness.
      • M2: Incorporates user preferences, dietary restrictions, allergen information, and item roles to provide highly personalized meal recommendations using contextual bandits and reinforcement learning .
  4. Evaluation Metrics: The paper introduces novel quantitative and qualitative metrics to evaluate the meal recommendations generated by the BEACON system . These metrics assess the quality of recommendations based on factors like duplicates, coverage, and user constraint satisfaction .

  5. Boosted Bandit Method: The paper demonstrates the efficacy of the boosted bandit method for generating robust meal recommendations across different user configurations and time frames . This method is used to address the problem of meal recommendation within the BEACON system .

In summary, the paper proposes a comprehensive approach to meal recommendation systems by introducing the BEACON system, innovative recommendation methods, a unique dataset, and effective evaluation metrics to guide users towards healthy and personalized food choices over extended time periods . The paper "BEACON: Balancing Convenience and Nutrition in Meals With Long-Term Group Recommendations and Reasoning on Multimodal Recipes" introduces several characteristics and advantages compared to previous methods in meal recommendation systems:

  1. Characteristics:

    • BEACON System: BEACON incorporates user preferences, dietary restrictions, allergen information, and item roles into the meal recommendation process, providing highly personalized meal recommendations using contextual bandits and reinforcement learning .
    • Recommendation Methods: The paper introduces three recommendation methods - M0, M1, and M2. M2, in particular, represents a significant advancement by incorporating user preferences and continuously learning to provide personalized recommendations over time .
    • Evaluation Metrics: The paper introduces novel quantitative and qualitative metrics to evaluate meal recommendations, including user constraint, duplicate meal, and meal coverage metrics, to assess the quality of recommendations .
    • Boosted Bandit Method: The paper demonstrates the efficacy of the boosted bandit method for generating robust meal recommendations across different user configurations and time frames .
  2. Advantages Compared to Previous Methods:

    • Personalization: Unlike previous methods, M2 in BEACON offers highly personalized meal recommendations by considering user preferences, dietary restrictions, and allergen information, leading to more tailored and relevant suggestions .
    • Continuous Learning: BEACON's M2 method continuously learns and improves its recommendations over time as more data is provided, making it a dynamic and evolving system compared to static recommendation approaches .
    • Improved Performance: The bandit algorithm in BEACON outperforms other methods in user constraint and meal coverage metrics, showcasing its effectiveness in providing informed recommendations based on user preferences and constraints .
    • Diverse Food Choices: The M0 method in BEACON introduces users to a diverse array of food choices without specific criteria, broadening their culinary experiences compared to more structured approaches .

In conclusion, the BEACON system stands out for its personalized recommendations, continuous learning capabilities, improved performance metrics, and the ability to offer diverse food choices to users, setting it apart from traditional meal recommendation methods .


Do any related researches exist? Who are the noteworthy researchers on this topic in this field?What is the key to the solution mentioned in the paper?

Several related research studies exist in the field of meal recommendations and nutrition. Noteworthy researchers in this area include Vansh Nagpal, Siva Likitha Valluru, Kausik Lakkaraju, and Biplav Srivastava . These researchers have worked on developing the BEACON system, which focuses on balancing convenience and nutrition in meals with long-term group recommendations and reasoning on multimodal recipes .

The key to the solution mentioned in the paper involves addressing the meal recommendation problem over long periods by providing users with food choices over meal configurations and long time horizons. The BEACON system introduces a novel meal recommendation problem, utilizes multimodal R3 format for recipe representations, and evaluates the recommendations based on quantitative and qualitative metrics such as duplicates, coverage, and user constraint satisfaction .


How were the experiments in the paper designed?

The experiments in the paper were designed with specific configurations and metrics to evaluate the performance of different algorithms for meal recommendations . Three different methods were used to recommend meals to users:

  • M0: Random/Baseline
  • M1: Sequential
  • M2: Relational Boosted Bandit . Each experiment displayed three metrics: user constraint (𝑢𝑐), duplicate meal (𝑑𝑚), and meal coverage (𝑚𝑐), along with various combinations calculated as averages . The bandit algorithm outperformed other methods in the user constraint metric and meal coverage metric, showing superior performance due to being the most informed out of the three algorithms . The experiments also considered different user preferences towards food features, with varying numbers of users having positive, negative, or neutral preferences, leading to decreasing user constraints across the configurations .

What is the dataset used for quantitative evaluation? Is the code open source?

The dataset used for quantitative evaluation in the study is the BEACON dataset, which consists of 50 R3 items comprising non-fast food and fast food items like Taco Bell and McDonald's . The code for the study is not explicitly mentioned to be open source in the provided context.


Do the experiments and results in the paper provide good support for the scientific hypotheses that need to be verified? Please analyze.

The experiments and results presented in the paper provide strong support for the scientific hypotheses that needed verification. The study conducted experiments using different algorithms, including bandit, sequential, and random, to evaluate the performance of the recommendation system in terms of user constraint, duplicate meal, and meal coverage metrics . The results indicated that the bandit algorithm outperformed the other methods in user constraint and meal coverage metrics, showcasing its effectiveness and informativeness . Additionally, the study carefully analyzed the performance of each algorithm across various user preferences configurations, demonstrating a systematic approach to hypothesis testing and evaluation .

Furthermore, the paper introduced a novel meal recommendation problem and the BEACON system to address the challenge of recommending meals over extended periods while considering user preferences and dietary constraints . By adopting a multimodal recipe representation format and converting fast food recipes into this format, the study showcased a comprehensive approach to meal recommendation that integrates both food content and preparation processes . This holistic methodology aligns with the scientific hypotheses of providing balanced and nutritious meal recommendations to users .

Overall, the experiments, results, and methodologies outlined in the paper offer robust support for the scientific hypotheses under investigation. The systematic evaluation of different algorithms, the introduction of a novel meal recommendation system, and the integration of multimodal recipe representations collectively contribute to the validation of the scientific hypotheses related to balancing convenience and nutrition in meal recommendations .


What are the contributions of this paper?

The paper "BEACON: Balancing Convenience and Nutrition in Meals With Long-Term Group Recommendations and Reasoning on Multimodal Recipes" makes several key contributions:

  1. Introduces the novel meal recommendation problem that involves food choices over meal configurations and long time horizons .
  2. Presents the BEACON system to address the challenge of meal recommendation over extended periods and provides a case study to demonstrate its utility .
  3. Adopts the multimodal R3 format and converts fast food recipes from popular chains like Taco Bell and McDonald’s into R3 representations using Large Language Models (LLMs) augmented with human supervision .
  4. Introduces novel quantitative and qualitative metrics to evaluate recommendations, measuring duplicates, coverage, and user constraint satisfaction .
  5. Demonstrates the effectiveness of the meal recommendations compared to appropriate baselines .

What work can be continued in depth?

To further enhance the existing work on meal recommendations and nutrition, several avenues for future exploration can be considered :

  • Implementing a more automated approach to generate recipe representations to expand the dataset, leading to more robust models.
  • Increasing the number of features related to ingredients and allergens to provide diverse recommendations catering to users with different dietary needs.
  • Experimenting with various recommendation algorithms and methods to explore the utilization of R3 representations effectively.
  • Developing an application that allows users to input preferences and receive tailored recommendations.
  • Conducting qualitative evaluations to demonstrate the acceptance and effectiveness of the recommendation system.
Scan the QR code to ask more questions about the paper
© 2025 Powerdrill. All rights reserved.